Reducing exposure to high levels of perfluorinated compounds in drinking water improves reproductive outcomes: evidence from an intervention in Minnesota.
Birth weight
Fertility
Perfluorocarbons
Pregnancy outcome
Preterm birth
Water pollution
Journal
Environmental health : a global access science source
ISSN: 1476-069X
Titre abrégé: Environ Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101147645
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 04 2020
22 04 2020
Historique:
received:
13
11
2019
accepted:
25
03
2020
entrez:
24
4
2020
pubmed:
24
4
2020
medline:
21
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) have been detected in drinking water supplies around the world and are the subject of intense regulatory debate. While they have been associated with several illnesses, their effects on reproductive outcomes remains uncertain. We analyzed birth outcomes in the east Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area from 2002 to 2011, where a portion of the population faced elevated exposure to PFASs due to long-term contamination of drinking water supplies from industrial waste disposal. Installation of a water filtration facility in the highly contaminated city of Oakdale, MN at the end of 2006 resulted in a sharp decrease in exposure to PFASs, creating a "natural experiment". Using a difference-in-differences approach, we compare the changes in birth outcomes before and after water filtration in Oakdale to the changes over the same period in neighboring communities where the treatment of municipal water remained constant. Average birth weight and average gestational age were statistically significantly lower in the highly exposed population than in the control area prior to filtration of municipal water supply. The highly exposed population faced increased odds of low birth weight (adjusted odds ratio 1.36, 95% CI 1.25-1.48) and pre-term birth (adjusted odds ratio 1.14, 95% CI 1.09-1.19) relative to the control before filtration, and these differences moderated after filtration. The general fertility rate was also significantly lower in the exposed population (incidence rate ratio 0.73, 95% CI 0.69-0.77) prior to filtration and appeared to be rebounding post-2006. Our findings provide evidence of a causal relationship between filtration of drinking water containing high levels of exposure to PFASs and improved reproductive outcomes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) have been detected in drinking water supplies around the world and are the subject of intense regulatory debate. While they have been associated with several illnesses, their effects on reproductive outcomes remains uncertain.
METHODS
We analyzed birth outcomes in the east Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area from 2002 to 2011, where a portion of the population faced elevated exposure to PFASs due to long-term contamination of drinking water supplies from industrial waste disposal. Installation of a water filtration facility in the highly contaminated city of Oakdale, MN at the end of 2006 resulted in a sharp decrease in exposure to PFASs, creating a "natural experiment". Using a difference-in-differences approach, we compare the changes in birth outcomes before and after water filtration in Oakdale to the changes over the same period in neighboring communities where the treatment of municipal water remained constant.
RESULTS
Average birth weight and average gestational age were statistically significantly lower in the highly exposed population than in the control area prior to filtration of municipal water supply. The highly exposed population faced increased odds of low birth weight (adjusted odds ratio 1.36, 95% CI 1.25-1.48) and pre-term birth (adjusted odds ratio 1.14, 95% CI 1.09-1.19) relative to the control before filtration, and these differences moderated after filtration. The general fertility rate was also significantly lower in the exposed population (incidence rate ratio 0.73, 95% CI 0.69-0.77) prior to filtration and appeared to be rebounding post-2006.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings provide evidence of a causal relationship between filtration of drinking water containing high levels of exposure to PFASs and improved reproductive outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32321520
doi: 10.1186/s12940-020-00591-0
pii: 10.1186/s12940-020-00591-0
pmc: PMC7178962
doi:
Substances chimiques
Drinking Water
0
Fluorocarbons
0
Water Pollutants, Chemical
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
42Références
Environ Health Perspect. 2013 Oct;121(10):1207-13
pubmed: 23838280
Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Nov;115(11):A528-9
pubmed: 18007963
Occup Environ Med. 1998 Oct;55(10):651-6
pubmed: 9930084
Environ Health Perspect. 2012 Aug;120(8):1201-7
pubmed: 22450153
Occup Environ Med. 2018 Jan;75(1):46-51
pubmed: 29133598
Reprod Toxicol. 2017 Mar;68:200-206
pubmed: 27592399
Reprod Toxicol. 2009 Jun;27(3-4):231-238
pubmed: 19049861
Environ Health Perspect. 2015 Dec;123(12):1317-24
pubmed: 26008903
Environ Health Perspect. 2015 Jan;123(1):57-63
pubmed: 25127343
Pediatrics. 2011 Jun;127(6):1111-24
pubmed: 21624885
Hum Reprod. 2015 Mar;30(3):701-9
pubmed: 25567616
Epidemiology. 2012 Mar;23(2):257-63
pubmed: 22081060
Environ Health Perspect. 2009 Jun;117(6):923-7
pubmed: 19590684
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Dec;66(12):1182-6
pubmed: 22577181
Matern Child Health J. 2011 Oct;15(7):836-44
pubmed: 19902344
Hum Reprod. 2009 May;24(5):1200-5
pubmed: 19176540
Environ Res. 2017 Jul;156:175-182
pubmed: 28349882
Environ Sci Technol. 2004 Sep 1;38(17):4489-95
pubmed: 15461154
Hum Reprod. 2012 Mar;27(3):873-80
pubmed: 22246448
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 25;653:359-369
pubmed: 30412881
Am J Epidemiol. 2012 Jun 15;175(12):1209-16
pubmed: 22517810
Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Nov;115(11):1670-6
pubmed: 18008002
Environ Res. 2015 Oct;142:535-41
pubmed: 26282225
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2010 Nov;20(7):589-97
pubmed: 19865074
Epidemiology. 2012 May;23(3):386-92
pubmed: 22370857
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Oct 1;45(19):8037-45
pubmed: 21469664
Environ Int. 2018 Jun;115:267-278
pubmed: 29605679
Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Oct 1;170(7):837-46
pubmed: 19692329
Environ Health Perspect. 2014 Oct;122(10):1028-39
pubmed: 24968388