Development of a universal endogenous qPCR control for eukaryotic DNA samples.
Endogenous control
Pathogen detection
Phytoplasma
Quantitative real-time PCR
Reference gene
Journal
Plant methods
ISSN: 1746-4811
Titre abrégé: Plant Methods
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245798
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
28
01
2020
accepted:
06
04
2020
entrez:
24
4
2020
pubmed:
24
4
2020
medline:
24
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Phytoplasma are obligate intracellular plant-pathogenic bacteria that infect a broad range of plant species and are transmitted by different insect species. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) is one of the most commonly used techniques for pathogen detection, especially for pathogens that cannot be cultivated outside their host like phytoplasma. PCR analysis requires the purification of total DNA from the sample and subsequent amplification of pathogen DNA with specific primers. The purified DNA contains mainly host DNA and only a marginal proportion is of phytoplasmal origin. Therefore, detection of phytoplasma DNA in a host DNA background must be sensitive, specific and reliable and is highly dependent on the quality and concentration of the purified DNA. DNA quality and concentration and the presence of PCR-inhibitors therefore have a direct impact on pathogen detection. Thus, it is indispensable for PCR-based diagnostic tests to validate the DNA preparation and DNA integrity before interpreting diagnostic results, especially in case that no pathogen DNA is detected. The use of an internal control allows to evaluate DNA integrity and the detection of PCR-inhibiting substances. Internal controls are generally host-specific or limited to a defined group of related species. A control suitable for the broad range of phytoplasma hosts comprising different insect and plant species is still missing. We developed a primer and probe combination that allows amplification of a conserved stretch of the eukaryotic 28S rDNA gene. The developed endogenous qPCR control serves as a DNA quality control and allows the analysis of different eukaryotic host species, including plants, insects, fish, fungi, mammals and human with a single primer/probe set in single- or multiplex assays. Quality and performance control is indispensable for pathogen detection by qPCR. Several plant pathogens are transmitted by insects and have a broad range of host species. The newly developed endogenous control can be used with all so far tested eukaryotic species and since multiplexing is possible, the described primer and probe set can be easily combined with other PCR-based pathogen detection systems.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Phytoplasma are obligate intracellular plant-pathogenic bacteria that infect a broad range of plant species and are transmitted by different insect species. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) is one of the most commonly used techniques for pathogen detection, especially for pathogens that cannot be cultivated outside their host like phytoplasma. PCR analysis requires the purification of total DNA from the sample and subsequent amplification of pathogen DNA with specific primers. The purified DNA contains mainly host DNA and only a marginal proportion is of phytoplasmal origin. Therefore, detection of phytoplasma DNA in a host DNA background must be sensitive, specific and reliable and is highly dependent on the quality and concentration of the purified DNA. DNA quality and concentration and the presence of PCR-inhibitors therefore have a direct impact on pathogen detection. Thus, it is indispensable for PCR-based diagnostic tests to validate the DNA preparation and DNA integrity before interpreting diagnostic results, especially in case that no pathogen DNA is detected. The use of an internal control allows to evaluate DNA integrity and the detection of PCR-inhibiting substances. Internal controls are generally host-specific or limited to a defined group of related species. A control suitable for the broad range of phytoplasma hosts comprising different insect and plant species is still missing.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We developed a primer and probe combination that allows amplification of a conserved stretch of the eukaryotic 28S rDNA gene. The developed endogenous qPCR control serves as a DNA quality control and allows the analysis of different eukaryotic host species, including plants, insects, fish, fungi, mammals and human with a single primer/probe set in single- or multiplex assays.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Quality and performance control is indispensable for pathogen detection by qPCR. Several plant pathogens are transmitted by insects and have a broad range of host species. The newly developed endogenous control can be used with all so far tested eukaryotic species and since multiplexing is possible, the described primer and probe set can be easily combined with other PCR-based pathogen detection systems.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32322292
doi: 10.1186/s13007-020-00597-2
pii: 597
pmc: PMC7160944
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
53Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsThe Research Centre Laimburg has a granted patent (Grant no: 102018000003299) directed to the sequences of the primers UNI28-fwd and Uni28-rev as well as the hydrolysis probe UNI28-P described in this study. All other authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential competing interests.
Références
Biomol Detect Quantif. 2017 Nov 22;14:19-28
pubmed: 29201647
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999 Jun 16;259(3):523-6
pubmed: 10364451
Science. 1988 Jan 29;239(4839):487-91
pubmed: 2448875
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 9;8(1):2689
pubmed: 29426915
Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1875:117-130
pubmed: 30361999
J Appl Genet. 2013 Nov;54(4):391-406
pubmed: 24078518
Methods Enzymol. 1987;155:335-50
pubmed: 3431465
PLoS One. 2017 May 17;12(5):e0177808
pubmed: 28545043
J Virol Methods. 2014 Jun;202:101-5
pubmed: 24642236
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;943:1-16
pubmed: 23104279
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 May;42(5):1863-8
pubmed: 15131141
Plant Dis. 1997 Feb;81(2):222-226
pubmed: 30870901
Mol Cell Probes. 2010 Oct;24(5):303-9
pubmed: 20600822
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 28;12(9):e0185427
pubmed: 28957362
Mol Cell Probes. 2013 Jun-Aug;27(3-4):129-36
pubmed: 23474195
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;938:245-52
pubmed: 22987421
Clin Chem. 2009 Apr;55(4):611-22
pubmed: 19246619
Adv Biomed Res. 2014 Feb 28;3:85
pubmed: 24761393
Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2004 Nov;17(11):1175-84
pubmed: 15553243
PLoS One. 2016 May 19;11(5):e0155891
pubmed: 27195795
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 12;13(1):e0191116
pubmed: 29329327
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 May;75(9):2945-50
pubmed: 19270148
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2001 Feb;18(2):293-305
pubmed: 11161763
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 May 02;34(8):e60
pubmed: 16670427
PLoS One. 2018 May 4;13(5):e0196715
pubmed: 29727459
J Clin Lab Anal. 2009;23(3):145-51
pubmed: 19455629
J Mol Biol. 1971 Mar 14;56(2):341-61
pubmed: 4927950
Trends Biotechnol. 2019 Jul;37(7):761-774
pubmed: 30654913
Biochemistry. 2006 Jun 13;45(23):7347-55
pubmed: 16752924
J Microbiol Methods. 2004 Apr;57(1):135-45
pubmed: 15003696
3 Biotech. 2016 Jun;6(1):61
pubmed: 28330131
Plant Dis. 2016 Dec;100(12):2513-2519
pubmed: 30686179
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;938:269-81
pubmed: 22987423
J Virol Methods. 2010 Feb;163(2):210-5
pubmed: 19781576