Ethical issues related to research on genome editing in human embryos.

CRISPR-Cas9 Egg donation Genome editing Oocyte donation Research ethics Whole genome sequencing

Journal

Computational and structural biotechnology journal
ISSN: 2001-0370
Titre abrégé: Comput Struct Biotechnol J
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101585369

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 15 11 2019
revised: 13 03 2020
accepted: 14 03 2020
entrez: 24 4 2020
pubmed: 24 4 2020
medline: 24 4 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Although the potential advantages of clinical germline genome editing (GGE) over currently available methods are limited, the implementation of GGE in the clinic has been proposed and discussed. Ethical issues related to such an application have been extensively debated, meanwhile, seemingly less attention has been paid to ethical implications of studies which would have to be conducted in order to evaluate potential clinical uses of GGE. In this article, we first provide an overview of the debate on potential clinical uses of GGE. Then, we discuss questions and ethical issues related to the studies relevant to evaluation of potential clinical uses of GGE. In particular, we describe the problems related to the acceptable safety threshold, current technical hurdles in human GGE, the destruction of human embryos used in the experiments, involvement of egg donors, and genomic sequencing performed on the samples of the research participants. The technical and ethical problems related to studies on GGE should be acknowledged and carefully considered in the process of deciding to apply technology in such a way that will provide benefits and minimize harms.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32322370
doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.03.014
pii: S2001-0370(19)30517-3
pmc: PMC7163211
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

887-896

Informations de copyright

© 2020 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Références

J Appl Philos. 2017 Aug;34(4):498-513
pubmed: 28919655
Genet Med. 2017 Jul;19(7):723-724
pubmed: 28125080
Protein Cell. 2017 Nov;8(11):811-822
pubmed: 28942539
Mol Genet Genomics. 2017 Jun;292(3):525-533
pubmed: 28251317
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr;28(2):269-79
pubmed: 24810188
Protein Cell. 2015 Jul;6(7):476-9
pubmed: 26113289
Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2019 Sep 6;17:289-296
pubmed: 31279230
Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 Jan;26(1):1-11
pubmed: 29192152
Mol Ther. 2015 Aug;23(8):1282
pubmed: 26227250
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Mar;3(3):200
pubmed: 30953019
Nature. 2015 Mar 26;519(7544):410-1
pubmed: 25810189
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2007 Sep;10(3):183-7
pubmed: 17786651
Protein Cell. 2015 May;6(5):363-372
pubmed: 25894090
New Bioeth. 2018 Apr;24(1):74-94
pubmed: 29529982
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016 May;33(5):581-588
pubmed: 27052831
Science. 2019 Apr 19;364(6437):289-292
pubmed: 30819928
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 16;377(20):1909-1911
pubmed: 29141159
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(12):35-7
pubmed: 26632359
Mol Ther. 2018 Nov 7;26(11):2631-2637
pubmed: 30166242
Science. 2018 Aug 31;361(6405):866-869
pubmed: 30166482
Bioethics. 2019 Nov;33(9):1072-1082
pubmed: 31489967
Hum Reprod. 1997 Sep;12(9):2076-80
pubmed: 9363733
Nat Med. 2019 Jun;25(6):890-897
pubmed: 31160821
Bioethics. 2020 Jan;34(1):60-69
pubmed: 31448423
Nature. 2017 Aug 24;548(7668):413-419
pubmed: 28783728
CRISPR J. 2019 Oct;2(5):304-315
pubmed: 31599685
Science. 2005 Jun 17;308(5729):1747-8
pubmed: 15905363
Reprod Biomed Online. 2017 May;34(5):480-485
pubmed: 28473127
CRISPR J. 2018 Apr;1:115-125
pubmed: 31021208
CRISPR J. 2020 Feb;3(1):52-63
pubmed: 32091253
Cell Stem Cell. 2018 Apr 5;22(4):481-482
pubmed: 29429945
Am J Hum Genet. 2017 Aug 3;101(2):167-176
pubmed: 28777929
Genome Biol. 2019 May 22;20(1):101
pubmed: 31118069
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Sep;36(9):1927-1934
pubmed: 31376102
Nature. 2019 Mar;567(7747):165-168
pubmed: 30867611
Nature. 2017 Oct 5;550(7674):67-73
pubmed: 28953884
Mol Ther. 2016 Mar;24(3):430-46
pubmed: 26755333
Science. 2019 Apr 19;364(6437):292-295
pubmed: 30819931
Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 Apr;26(4):445-449
pubmed: 29326428
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014 Nov 24;12:108
pubmed: 25420886
N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 7;380(10):897-899
pubmed: 30649993
Account Res. 2019 Aug;26(6):351-368
pubmed: 31304778
Nature. 2019 Jan;565(7738):135
pubmed: 30602779

Auteurs

Emilia Niemiec (E)

Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Box 564, 751 22 Uppsala, Sweden.

Heidi Carmen Howard (HC)

Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Box 564, 751 22 Uppsala, Sweden.

Classifications MeSH