A smaller heart-aorta-angle associates with ascending aortic dilatation and increases wall shear stress.
Adult
Aged
Aorta
/ anatomy & histology
Aortic Diseases
/ diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve
/ diagnostic imaging
Computed Tomography Angiography
Coronary Angiography
Dilatation, Pathologic
/ diagnostic imaging
Female
Heart
/ anatomy & histology
Hemodynamics
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ methods
Male
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Stress, Mechanical
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Aorta thoracic
Aortic aneurysm
Heart ventricles
Magnetic resonance imaging
Tomography x-ray computed
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
09
02
2020
accepted:
31
03
2020
revised:
10
03
2020
pubmed:
24
4
2020
medline:
9
2
2021
entrez:
24
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the orientation of the heart, measured as an angle between the long axis of the heart and ascending aorta midline (heart-aorta-angle, HAA), associates with ascending aortic (AA) dilatation. Furthermore, the association between HAA and wall shear stress (WSS) was studied. HAA was retrospectively measured in 1000 consecutive coronary artery computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) images in patients with low-to-moderate pretest probability for coronary artery disease (CAD). To evaluate the effects of HAA on AA flow, 4D flow MRI was performed for 28 patients with AA dilatation (> 40 mm) and WSS was analyzed. The mean age of patients undergoing CCTA was 52.9 ± 9.8 years; 66.5% were women. Their median HAA was 128.7° and interquartile range 123.3-134.1°. HAA was significantly smaller in patients with dilated AA (median 126.7° [121.3-130.8°]) compared with the patients with normal AA (median 129.5° [124.3-135.3°], p < 0.001). HAA was smaller in males (p < 0.001) and in patients with diabetes (p = 0.016), hypertension (p = 0.001), CAD (p = 0.003), hypercholesterolemia (p < 0.001), and bicuspid aortic valve (p = 0.025) than without these factors. In a subpopulation without any of these underlying diseases (n = 233), HAA was still significantly smaller in the patients with dilated AA (median 127.9° [124.3-134.3°]) compared with patients with normal AA (median 131.9° [127.6-136.9°], p = 0.013). In 4D flow MRI, a smaller HAA correlated with increased total WSS in the outer curvature of the proximal AA (r = - 0.510, p = 0.006). A smaller HAA associates with AA dilatation and affects the blood flow in the proximal AA. • A smaller angle between the long axis of the heart and ascending aorta midline associated with ascending aortic dilatation. • A smaller heart-aorta-angle correlated with increased total wall shear stress in the outer curvature of the proximal ascending aorta.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32323010
doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06852-3
pii: 10.1007/s00330-020-06852-3
pmc: PMC7431431
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5149-5157Références
Eur Radiol. 2020 Feb;30(2):1079-1087
pubmed: 31529253
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Jul;50(1):136-145
pubmed: 30659686
Am J Cardiol. 2013 May 15;111(10):1510-6
pubmed: 23497775
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015 Aug 10;17:72
pubmed: 26257141
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Sep 13;6(9):
pubmed: 28903936
Eur Heart J. 2014 Nov 1;35(41):2873-926
pubmed: 25173340
Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Aug;70(2):255-9
pubmed: 3299186
Clin Radiol. 2018 Nov;73(11):982.e17-982.e26
pubmed: 30029834
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2006 Jun;40(3):175-8
pubmed: 16798665
Nutr Today. 2015 May;50(3):117-128
pubmed: 27340299
Heart. 2009 Nov;95(21):1784-91
pubmed: 19549621
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;956:427-445
pubmed: 27873227
Cardiovasc Res. 2018 Nov 1;114(13):1702-1713
pubmed: 30052821
J Vasc Surg. 1991 Mar;13(3):452-8
pubmed: 1999868
Heart. 2018 Nov;104(21):1772-1777
pubmed: 29593078
Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Jun;67(6):1927-30; discussion 1953-8
pubmed: 10391340
Am J Cardiol. 1989 Sep 1;64(8):507-12
pubmed: 2773795