What influences conversion to open surgery during laparoscopic colorectal resection?
Colectomy
Conversion
Laparoscopic
Open
Journal
Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2021
04 2021
Historique:
received:
07
02
2019
accepted:
31
03
2020
pubmed:
24
4
2020
medline:
21
7
2021
entrez:
24
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We analyzed the risk of morbidity and mortality in laparoscopic (Lap) conversion for colorectal surgery across a group of subspecialist surgeons with expertise in minimally invasive techniques. We reviewed prospective data patients who underwent abdominopelvic procedures from 7/1/2007 to 12/31/2016 at a tertiary care facility. We identified procedures that were converted from Lap to open (Lap converted). Lap converted procedures were matched to Lap completed and open procedures based on elective versus urgent and surgeon. We also abstracted patient demographics and outcomes at 30 days using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program defined adverse event list. We analyzed outcomes across these groups (Lap converted, Lap completed, open procedures) with x From a database of 12,454 procedures, we identified 100 Lap converted procedures and matched them to 305 open procedures and 339 Lap completed procedures. In our dataset of abdominopelvic procedures, Lap techniques were attempted in 49 ± 1%. We noted a higher risk of aggerate morbidity following open procedures (33 ± 10) as compared to Lap converted (29 ± 17%) and the matched Lap completed procedures (18 ± 8%; p < 0.001). Converted cases had the longest operative time (222 ± 102 min), compared to lap completed (177 ± 110), and open procedures (183 ± 89). There were no differences in mortality, sepsis complications, anastomotic leaks, or unplanned returns to the operating room across the three operative groups. Although aggregate morbidity of Lap converted procedures is higher than in Lap completed procedures, it remains less than in matched open procedures. Compared to Lap completed procedures, the additional morbidity of Lap converted procedures appears to be related to additional surgical site infection risk. Our data suggest that surgeons should not necessarily be influenced by additional complications associated with conversion when contemplating complex laparoscopic colorectal procedures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32323018
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07536-1
pii: 10.1007/s00464-020-07536-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1584-1590Références
Simorov A, Shaligram A, Shostrom V et al (2012) Laparoscopic colon resection trends in utilization and rate of conversion to open procedure: a national database review of academic medical centers. Ann Surg 256:462–468
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182657ec5
Slim K, Pezet D, Riff Y et al (1995) High morbidity rate after converted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 82:1406–1408
doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800821036
Poon J, Law W, Wong I et al (2009) Impact of laparoscopic colorectal resection on surgical site infection. Ann Surg 249(1):77–81
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819279e3
Thorpe H, Jayne DG, Guillou PJ et al (2008) Patient factors influencing conversion from laparoscopically assisted to open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 95:199–205
doi: 10.1002/bjs.5907
Schlachta C, Mamazza J, Gregoire R (2003) Predicting conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 17:1228–1291
doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8920-9
Yamamoto S, Fukunaga M, Miyajima N et al (2009) Impact of conversion on surgical outcomes after laparoscopic operation for rectal carcinoma: a retrospective study of 1,073 patients. J Am Coll Surg 208(3):383–389
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.12.002
Pikarsky AJ, Saida Y, Yamaguchi T et al (2002) Is obesity a high-risk factor for laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc 16(5):855–858
doi: 10.1007/s004640080069
Vaccaro C, Gustavo R, Guillermo O et al (2014) Laparoscopic colorectal resection: a simple predictor model and a stratification risk for conversion to open surgery. Disease of the Colon and Rectum 57(7):869–874
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000137
Masoomi H, Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Mills S et al (2015) Risk factors for conversion or laparoscopic surgery to open surgery: does conversion worsen outcome? World J Surg 39:1240–1247
doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-2958-z
Tekkis P, Senagore A, Delaney C (2005) Conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 19:47–54
doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-8904-z
Tekkis P, Senagore A, Delaney C et al (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery—comparison of right sided and left sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000167857.14690.68
Agha A, Furst A (2008) Iesalniesk I Conversion rate in 300 laparoscopic rectal resections and its influence on morbidity and oncological outcome. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:409–417
doi: 10.1007/s00384-007-0425-5
Gorgun E, Benlice C, Abbas M (2016) Conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: are short-term outcomes worse than with open surgery? Tech Coloproctol 20:845–851
doi: 10.1007/s10151-016-1554-z
Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Masoomi H, Mills S et al (2014) Outcomes of conversion of laparoscopic colorectal surgery to open surgery. JSLS. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2014.00230
doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00230
pubmed: 25587213
pmcid: 4283100
Kiran R, El-Gazzaz G, Vogel J et al (2010) Laparoscopic approach significantly reduces surgical site infections after colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 211:232–238
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.03.028
Moine M, Fabre J, Vacher C et al (2003) Factors and consequences of conversion in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease. Br J Surg 90:323
doi: 10.1002/bjs.4035
Franko J, O’Connell B, Mehall J et al (2006) The influences of prior abdominal operations on conversion and complication rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. JSLS 10:169–175
pubmed: 16882414
pmcid: 3016125
Curet M (2000) Special problems in laparoscopic surgery: previous abdominal surgery, obesity, and pregnancy. Surg Clin North Am 80(4):1093–1110
doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70215-2