Factors Associated With Chemoradiation Therapy Interruption and Noncompletion Among Patients With Squamous Cell Anal Carcinoma.
Journal
JAMA oncology
ISSN: 2374-2445
Titre abrégé: JAMA Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101652861
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 06 2020
01 06 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
24
4
2020
medline:
23
1
2021
entrez:
24
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Definitive chemoradiation for anal cancer is effective but may be associated with toxic effects, and some patients may not be able to complete the planned treatment. Identifying factors associated with treatment interruption and noncompletion is important to target quality improvement efforts. To identify rates of chemoradiation treatment interruption or noncompletion and factors associated with this among patients with anal cancer treated in routine clinical practice. In this population-based, retrospective cohort study, the Ontario Cancer Registry was used to identify all incident cases of squamous cell anal cancer treated with curative-intent radiation from 2007 to 2015 in Ontario, Canada. Final analysis of data was performed on August 9, 2019. Curative-intent radiation therapy. Treatment interruption was defined as more than 7 days between fractions of radiation. Radiation completion was defined as receipt of 45 Gy or more and 25 fractions of radiation. Chemoradiation completion was defined as radiation completion and 2 doses of combination chemotherapy. Associations between patient factors and treatment interruption and noncompletion were estimated with log-binomial models. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the association of treatment interruption or noncompletion with all-cause death, cancer-specific death, and the combined outcome of colostomy or death. Overall, 1125 patients with stage I-III anal cancer were treated with curative-intent radiation. Treatment interruptions occurred in 262 (23%). Radiation and chemoradiation noncompletion occurred in 199 (18%) and 280 (25%), respectively. No associations were found to correlate with an increased risk of treatment interruption. Patients older than 70 years were less likely to complete chemoradiation (risk ratio [RR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.52-0.70), compared with those younger than 50 years. Patients with a higher number of comorbidities were also less likely to complete chemoradiation (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51-0.95). Patients who did not complete chemoradiation had a higher risk of requiring salvage abdominoperineal resection (RR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.03, 2.31), overall death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.54; 95% CI, 1.23-1.92), cancer-specific death (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.14-2.22), and colostomy or death (HR, 1.80; 95% CI: 1.10-2.93). Treatment interruptions longer than 7 days were not associated with death. Many patients undergoing curative-intent chemoradiation for anal cancer experienced treatment interruption or noncompletion. Quality improvement initiatives to optimize treatment continuity and completion are needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32324199
pii: 2764903
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0809
pmc: PMC7180731
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic
0
Fluorouracil
U3P01618RT
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
881-887Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
Br J Cancer. 2014 Feb 4;110(3):551-5
pubmed: 24495873
Br J Cancer. 2005 Apr 11;92(7):1221-5
pubmed: 15798772
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 May 1;86(1):27-33
pubmed: 23154075
Prev Med. 2007 Oct;45(4):247-51
pubmed: 17950122
J Clin Oncol. 1997 May;15(5):2040-9
pubmed: 9164216
Cancer. 1999 Jan 1;85(1):26-31
pubmed: 9921970
J Oncol Pract. 2017 Apr;13(4):e319-e328
pubmed: 28267393
Acta Oncol. 1988;27(2):131-46
pubmed: 3390344
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2007 Mar;61(3):261-8
pubmed: 17085056
Lancet Oncol. 2013 May;14(6):516-24
pubmed: 23578724
Lancet. 1996 Oct 19;348(9034):1049-54
pubmed: 8874455
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Dec 1;28(34):5061-6
pubmed: 20956625
J Clin Oncol. 1996 Sep;14(9):2527-39
pubmed: 8823332
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Apr 20;31(12):1569-75
pubmed: 23509304
Acta Oncol. 2017 Jan;56(1):81-87
pubmed: 27808666
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995 Oct 15;33(3):549-62
pubmed: 7558943
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019 Jan;39:216-225
pubmed: 31099616
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Oct;40(10):1165-76
pubmed: 25239441
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Jul;16(7):852-871
pubmed: 30006428
Br J Cancer. 2003 Dec 1;89(11):2057-61
pubmed: 14647138
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Sep;45(8):738-9
pubmed: 21552136
Lancet Oncol. 2002 Nov;3(11):693-701
pubmed: 12424072
Nat Rev Cancer. 2005 Jul;5(7):516-25
pubmed: 15965493
Cancer. 2018 Nov 15;124(22):4383-4392
pubmed: 30329160
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jul 16;18(1):740
pubmed: 30012115
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Oct;60(10):1993-4
pubmed: 23057462