ELLIPTA Versus DISKUS plus HandiHaler in COPD: A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Study in a Clinical Trial Setting.
DISKUS
ELLIPTA
HandiHaler
copd
correct use
patient preference
Journal
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.)
ISSN: 2372-952X
Titre abrégé: Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101635411
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Apr 2020
Historique:
entrez:
24
4
2020
pubmed:
24
4
2020
medline:
24
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Inhaler errors among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can reduce treatment efficacy. This randomized, open-label, crossover study evaluated correct use of ELLIPTA versus DISKUS plus HandiHaler. Participants with COPD attended at least 3 study visits (Day 1 [Visit 1], Day 28 [Visit 2], and Day 56 [Visit 3]). Inhalers contained placebo; usual maintenance medication was continued. Participants were randomized to an inhaler sequence (ELLIPTA then DISKUS plus HandiHaler, or the reverse) and preference questionnaire at Visit 1. Participants read the instructions for use in the approved prescribing information for their inhaler(s) and correct use was assessed at Visit 1 (verbal guidance provided if required). Correct use was reassessed at Visit 2, and with the next inhaler(s) at Visit 3. Primary endpoint was the proportion of participants demonstrating correct use (0 errors) with the assigned inhaler(s) after 28 days. A greater proportion of study participants (n = 217) correctly used ELLIPTA (96%) versus DISKUS plus HandiHaler (87%) after 28 days. The odds of demonstrating correct use with ELLIPTA were 6.88 times that of DISKUS plus HandiHaler ( Delivery of COPD maintenance therapy via ELLIPTA demonstrates higher correct use rates and lower critical error rates compared with DISKUS plus HandiHaler.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Inhaler errors among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can reduce treatment efficacy.
METHODS
METHODS
This randomized, open-label, crossover study evaluated correct use of ELLIPTA versus DISKUS plus HandiHaler. Participants with COPD attended at least 3 study visits (Day 1 [Visit 1], Day 28 [Visit 2], and Day 56 [Visit 3]). Inhalers contained placebo; usual maintenance medication was continued. Participants were randomized to an inhaler sequence (ELLIPTA then DISKUS plus HandiHaler, or the reverse) and preference questionnaire at Visit 1. Participants read the instructions for use in the approved prescribing information for their inhaler(s) and correct use was assessed at Visit 1 (verbal guidance provided if required). Correct use was reassessed at Visit 2, and with the next inhaler(s) at Visit 3. Primary endpoint was the proportion of participants demonstrating correct use (0 errors) with the assigned inhaler(s) after 28 days.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A greater proportion of study participants (n = 217) correctly used ELLIPTA (96%) versus DISKUS plus HandiHaler (87%) after 28 days. The odds of demonstrating correct use with ELLIPTA were 6.88 times that of DISKUS plus HandiHaler (
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Delivery of COPD maintenance therapy via ELLIPTA demonstrates higher correct use rates and lower critical error rates compared with DISKUS plus HandiHaler.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32324983
doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.7.2.2019.0153
pmc: PMC7454022
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
118-129Subventions
Organisme : GlaxoSmithKline plc.
Pays : United States
Organisme : GlaxoSmithKline plc.
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
JCOPDF © 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
EMK has participated in consulting, advisory boards, speaker panels, or received travel reimbursement from Amphastar, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Cipla, GlaxoSmithKline plc., Mylan, Novartis, Oriel, Pearl, Sunovion, Teva, and Theravance. He has conducted multicenter clinical research trials for approximately 40 pharmaceutical companies. SS has been a principal investigator for 20 years and has conducted clinical research trials for a large number of pharmaceutical companies. He has also participated as a consultant and on advisory boards and speaker panels for pharmaceutical companies including AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline plc., Mylan, Menlo, Novartis, Pearl, Sunovion, Teva, and Theravance. MZ, VM, RJ, KC, and RS are employees of, and own shares in, GlaxoSmithKline plc. Editorial support (in the form of writing assistance, collating author comments, assembling tables and/or figures, grammatical editing, fact checking, and referencing) was provided by Matthew Hallam, MSc(Res) and Joanna Wilson, PhD, of Gardine—Caldwell Communications (Macclesfield, UK) and was funded by GlaxoSmithKline plc. Trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
Références
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017 Apr 3;27(1):22
pubmed: 28373682
Thorax. 2015 Jun;70(6):519-27
pubmed: 25841237
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 03;378(18):1671-1680
pubmed: 29668352
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Aug 15;196(4):438-446
pubmed: 28375647
Eur Respir J. 1999 Nov;14(5):1034-7
pubmed: 10596686
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007 Sep 15;176(6):532-55
pubmed: 17507545
Respir Med. 2011 Jun;105(6):930-8
pubmed: 21367593
Respir Med. 2013 Jan;107(1):37-46
pubmed: 23098685
Eur Respir J. 2004 Jun;23(6):932-46
pubmed: 15219010
Respir Res. 2018 Jan 16;19(1):10
pubmed: 29338792
Chest. 2016 Aug;150(2):394-406
pubmed: 27060726
Respir Med. 2014 Feb;108(2):358-65
pubmed: 24209768
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2016 Nov 24;26:16079
pubmed: 27883002
Thorax. 2008 Sep;63(9):831-8
pubmed: 18728206
Thorax. 2008 Jul;63(7):592-8
pubmed: 18245142
J Pediatr. 2005 Feb;146(2):157-9
pubmed: 15689896
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Aug 21;13:2515-2523
pubmed: 30174421
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Aug 18;10:1561-72
pubmed: 27574405
Int J Pharm Pract. 2010 Aug;18(4):209-16
pubmed: 20636672
COPD. 2018 Feb;15(1):46-50
pubmed: 29227727