Modeling the interaction of numerosity and perceptual variables with the diffusion model.

Approximate number system Conflict effect Diffusion model Interaction of numerosity and perceptual features Response time and accuracy

Journal

Cognitive psychology
ISSN: 1095-5623
Titre abrégé: Cogn Psychol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0241111

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 2020
Historique:
received: 24 02 2020
accepted: 25 02 2020
pubmed: 24 4 2020
medline: 22 6 2021
entrez: 24 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Ratcliff and McKoon (2018) proposed integrated diffusion models for numerosity judgments in which a numerosity representation provides evidence used to drive the decision process. We extend this modeling framework to examine the interaction of non-numeric perceptual variables with numerosity by assuming that drift rate and non-decision time are functions of those variables. Four experiments were conducted with two different types of stimuli: a single array of intermingled blue and yellow dots in which both numerosity and dot area vary over trials and two side-by-side arrays of dots in which numerosity, dot area, and convex hull vary over trials. The tasks were to decide whether there were more blue or yellow dots (two experiments), more dots on which side, or which dots have a larger total area. Development of models started from the principled models in Ratcliff and McKoon (2018) and became somewhat ad hoc as we attempted to capture unexpected patterns induced by the conflict between numerosity and perceptual variables. In the three tasks involving numerosity judgments, the effects of the non-numeric variables were moderated by the number of dots. Under a high conflict, judgments were dominated by perceptual variables and produced an unexpected shift in the leading edge of the reaction time (RT) distributions. Although the resulting models were able to predict most of the accuracy and RT patterns, the models were not able to completely capture this shift in the RT distributions. However, when subjects judged area, numerosity affected perceptual judgments but there was no leading edge effect. Based on the results, it appears that the integrated diffusion models provide an effective framework to study the role of numerical and perceptual variables in numerosity tasks and their context-dependency.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32325289
pii: S0010-0285(20)30017-7
doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101288
pmc: PMC7319178
mid: NIHMS1586214
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101288

Subventions

Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG041176
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG057841
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R56 AG057841
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Références

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Apr;26(2):506-26
pubmed: 10811160
Psychol Bull. 1991 Mar;109(2):163-203
pubmed: 2034749
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1988 Jan;14(1):126-35
pubmed: 2963892
Psychol Rev. 2010 Jul;117(3):759-84
pubmed: 20658852
Cognition. 2014 Apr;131(1):92-107
pubmed: 24462713
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct;35(5):1398-412
pubmed: 19803645
Cogn Psychol. 1980 Oct;12(4):523-53
pubmed: 7418368
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jul 10;109(28):11116-20
pubmed: 22733748
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Dec;14(12):542-51
pubmed: 21055996
Psychol Rev. 1999 Apr;106(2):261-300
pubmed: 10378014
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2016 Nov;171:17-35
pubmed: 27640140
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Apr;40(2):870-88
pubmed: 24446719
Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Apr;7(4):145-147
pubmed: 12691758
Dev Psychol. 2008 Sep;44(5):1457-65
pubmed: 18793076
Cognition. 2010 Jun;115(3):394-406
pubmed: 20347435
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Nov;141(4):642-8
pubmed: 22082115
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Feb;139(1):70-94
pubmed: 20121313
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 May;26(5):1013-20
pubmed: 24345168
Neuron. 2003 Jan 9;37(1):149-57
pubmed: 12526780
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Nov;16(9):1493-504
pubmed: 15601514
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Aug;143(4):1476-88
pubmed: 24548281
Br J Educ Psychol. 2012 Mar;82(Pt 1):64-81
pubmed: 21199482
Decision (Wash D C ). 2015;2015:
pubmed: 26236754
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Dec;18(6):1222-9
pubmed: 21898191
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Jul;8(7):307-14
pubmed: 15242690
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Dec;93(Pt A):128-141
pubmed: 27693702
Cognition. 2010 Jul;116(1):33-41
pubmed: 20381023
Learn Individ Differ. 2013 Jun 1;25:126-133
pubmed: 23814453
Cognition. 2015 Sep;142:247-65
pubmed: 26056747
Neuron. 2004 Oct 28;44(3):547-55
pubmed: 15504333
Psychol Sci. 2013 Oct;24(10):2013-9
pubmed: 23921769
Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Feb;4(2):59-65
pubmed: 10652523
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 13;8(6):e67374
pubmed: 23785521
Cogn Psychol. 2011 Dec;63(4):210-38
pubmed: 21964663
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 Aug;18(3):872-82
pubmed: 1500881
J Neurosci. 2015 Jan 14;35(2):485-94
pubmed: 25589744
Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e171
pubmed: 29342626
Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Sep;9(3):438-81
pubmed: 12412886
Cognition. 2017 Nov;168:222-233
pubmed: 28715669
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Nov;45(11):2098-2119
pubmed: 30802093
Br J Dev Psychol. 2012 Jun;30(Pt 2):344-57
pubmed: 22550952
Psychol Rev. 1990 Jul;97(3):332-61
pubmed: 2200075
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2015 Dec;24(6):458-470
pubmed: 26722193
Psychol Sci. 2002 Mar;13(2):150-6
pubmed: 11933999
Nature. 2008 Oct 2;455(7213):665-8
pubmed: 18776888
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e23749
pubmed: 21935362
Cogn Psychol. 2018 Jun;103:1-22
pubmed: 29501775
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Nov;36(4):702-16
pubmed: 15641417
Psychol Rev. 2004 Apr;111(2):333-67
pubmed: 15065913
Psychol Rev. 2018 Mar;125(2):183-217
pubmed: 29144149
J Cogn Neurosci. 1993 Fall;5(4):390-407
pubmed: 23964915
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Dec;152:278-293
pubmed: 27596808
Vision Res. 2016 Sep;126:291-307
pubmed: 26386344
Dev Sci. 2011 Nov;14(6):1292-300
pubmed: 22010889
Cogn Psychol. 2014 Jul;72:162-95
pubmed: 24762975
J Neurosci. 2015 Jul 15;35(28):10371-85
pubmed: 26180211
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37426
pubmed: 22616007
Cognition. 1992 Aug;44(1-2):43-74
pubmed: 1511586
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1234-1251
pubmed: 27966103
Cogn Psychol. 2008 Nov;57(3):153-78
pubmed: 18243170
Neural Comput. 2008 Apr;20(4):873-922
pubmed: 18085991
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Mar;114(3):418-31
pubmed: 23270796
Dev Sci. 2014 Jul;17(4):525-36
pubmed: 24796511
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Jun-Jul;41-42:58-65
pubmed: 26057838
Neural Comput. 2012 May;24(5):1186-229
pubmed: 22295983
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 May;148:163-72
pubmed: 24583622
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Apr 19;6:68
pubmed: 22529786
Cognition. 2014 Oct;133(1):188-200
pubmed: 25044247
Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):550-92
pubmed: 11488378
Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e164
pubmed: 27530053
Psychol Rev. 2015 Apr;122(2):312-336
pubmed: 25844875
J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 May;103(1):17-29
pubmed: 18513738

Auteurs

Inhan Kang (I)

The Ohio State University, 291 Psychology Building, 1835 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, United States. Electronic address: kang.985@osu.edu.

Roger Ratcliff (R)

The Ohio State University, 291 Psychology Building, 1835 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, United States. Electronic address: ratcliff.22@osu.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH