Acute Effects of High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Foot Muscle Strength, Passive Ankle Kinesthesia, and Static Balance: A Pilot Study.
foot muscle strength
high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS)
passive ankle kinesthesia
static balance
Journal
Brain sciences
ISSN: 2076-3425
Titre abrégé: Brain Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101598646
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Apr 2020
21 Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
20
03
2020
revised:
18
04
2020
accepted:
19
04
2020
entrez:
25
4
2020
pubmed:
25
4
2020
medline:
25
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aimed to examine the effects of single-session anodal high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) on the strength of intrinsic foot muscles, passive ankle kinesthesia, and static balance. In this double-blinded self-controlled study, 14 healthy younger adults were asked to complete assessments of foot muscle strength, passive ankle kinesthesia, and static balance before and after a 20-minute session of either HD-tDCS or sham stimulation (i.e., control) at two visits separated by one week. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to examine the effects of HD-tDCS on metatarsophalangeal joint flexor strength, toe flexor strength, the passive kinesthesia threshold of ankle joint, and the average sway velocity of the center of gravity. All participants completed all study procedures and no side effects nor risk events were reported. Blinding was shown to be successful, with an overall accuracy of 35.7% in the guess of stimulation type (p = 0.347). No main effects of intervention, time, or their interaction were observed for foot muscle strength ( The results of this pilot study suggested that single-session HD-tDCS may improve the flexor strength of the first toe, although no statistically significant differences were observed between the anodal HD-tDCS and sham procedure groups. Additionally, passive ankle kinesthesia and static standing balance performance were improved from pre to post stimulation, but no significant differences were observed between the HD-tDCS and sham procedure groups. This may be potentially due to ceiling effects in this healthy cohort of a small sample size. Nevertheless, these preliminary findings may provide critical knowledge of optimal stimulation parameters, effect size, and power estimation of HD-tDCS for future trials aiming to confirm and expand the findings of this pilot study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32326228
pii: brainsci10040246
doi: 10.3390/brainsci10040246
pmc: PMC7226500
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
Références
J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Oct;20(10):915-920
pubmed: 28385562
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 28;7(1):480
pubmed: 28352100
Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Nov;126(11):2181-8
pubmed: 25922128
J Sport Health Sci. 2019 Sep;8(5):494-502
pubmed: 31534824
J Sport Health Sci. 2019 Sep;8(5):422-441
pubmed: 31534817
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Mar;236(3):795-802
pubmed: 29335751
Neurosci Lett. 2014 Apr 3;564:6-10
pubmed: 24508704
Front Neurosci. 2017 Apr 04;11:179
pubmed: 28420959
Brain Stimul. 2018 May - Jun;11(3):518-527
pubmed: 29361442
Brain Stimul. 2018 Sep - Oct;11(5):991-997
pubmed: 29784589
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
pubmed: 17695343
Brain Stimul. 2019 May - Jun;12(3):668-673
pubmed: 30639235
Brain Stimul. 2019 May - Jun;12(3):593-605
pubmed: 30630690
J Sports Sci. 2015;33(16):1667-74
pubmed: 25712530
J Sci Med Sport. 2016 Sep;19(9):713-5
pubmed: 26655866
Br J Sports Med. 2015 Mar;49(5):290
pubmed: 24659509
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60
pubmed: 19897823
PeerJ. 2017 Mar 2;5:e3028
pubmed: 28265507
Cogn Process. 2019 Aug;20(3):277-289
pubmed: 30798484
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 17;17(4):
pubmed: 32079188
Somatosens Mot Res. 2019 Jun;36(2):122-135
pubmed: 31181963
J Foot Ankle Res. 2014 May 05;7:26
pubmed: 24955128
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Jul;196(3):459-65
pubmed: 19479243
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Feb 17;11:72
pubmed: 28261079
Mov Disord. 2018 Apr;33(4):642-646
pubmed: 29436740
Int J Sports Med. 2015 Jun;36(7):592-5
pubmed: 25831402
Front Neurosci. 2018 Oct 31;12:787
pubmed: 30429768
J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3:633-9
pubmed: 10990547
Prog Brain Res. 2018;240:317-339
pubmed: 30390837
Sports Med. 2017 Jul;47(7):1271-1288
pubmed: 28005191
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Jan 21;25:618-626
pubmed: 30665229
Am J Sports Med. 1997 Jan-Feb;25(1):130-7
pubmed: 9006708
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 26;13(12):e0209513
pubmed: 30586389
Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Jan;128(1):56-92
pubmed: 27866120
Neurosci Lett. 2020 Feb 6;719:133887
pubmed: 30339919
Clin Sports Med. 2015 Apr;34(2):347-61
pubmed: 25818718
J Pain. 2012 Feb;13(2):112-20
pubmed: 22104190
Neurosci Lett. 2010 Nov 12;485(1):6-10
pubmed: 20817078
J Vis Exp. 2013 Jul 14;(77):e50309
pubmed: 23893039
Ann Biomed Eng. 2013 Nov;41(11):2437-47
pubmed: 23780473
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 May;32(5):1336-1341
pubmed: 28489629
Front Neuroanat. 2015 Jul 15;9:89
pubmed: 26236199
Brain Stimul. 2009 Oct;2(4):201-7, 207.e1
pubmed: 20648973
Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;117(4):845-50
pubmed: 16427357