Auditory Processing of Speech and Tones in Children With Tuberous Sclerosis Complex.

MVPA Tuberous Sclerosis Complex auditory evoked potential autism spectrum disorder mismatch negativity

Journal

Frontiers in integrative neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5145
Titre abrégé: Front Integr Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477950

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 30 09 2019
accepted: 05 03 2020
entrez: 25 4 2020
pubmed: 25 4 2020
medline: 25 4 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Individuals with Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC) have atypical white matter integrity and neural connectivity in the brain, including language pathways. To explore functional activity associated with auditory and language processing in individuals with TSC, we used electroencephalography (EEG) to examine basic auditory correlates of detection (P1, N2, N4) and discrimination (mismatch negativity, MMN) of speech and non-speech stimuli for children with TSC and age- and sex-matched typically developing (TD) children. Children with TSC (TSC group) and without TSC (typically developing, TD group) participated in an auditory MMN paradigm containing two blocks of vowels (/a/and/u/) and two blocks of tones (800 Hz and 400 Hz). Continuous EEG data were collected. Multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) was used to explore functional specificity of neural auditory processing. Speech-specific P1, N2, and N4 waveform components of the auditory evoked potential (AEP) were compared, and the mismatch response was calculated for both speech and tones. MVPA showed that the TD group, but not the TSC group, demonstrated above-chance pairwise decoding between speech and tones. The AEP component analysis suggested that while the TD group had an increased P1 amplitude in response to vowels compared to tones, the TSC group did not show this enhanced response to vowels. Additionally, the TD group had a greater N2 amplitude in response to vowels, but not tones, compared to the TSC group. The TSC group also demonstrated a longer N4 latency to vowels compared to tones, which was not seen in the TD group. No group differences were observed in the MMN response. In this study we identified features of the auditory response to speech sounds, but not acoustically matched tones, which differentiate children with TSC from TD children.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32327979
doi: 10.3389/fnint.2020.00014
pmc: PMC7161665
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

14

Subventions

Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : U54 HD090255
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 O’Brien, Bayet, Riley, Nelson, Sahin and Modi.

Références

J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Apr;29(4):677-697
pubmed: 27779910
Front Syst Neurosci. 2017 Sep 26;11:61
pubmed: 29018336
Autism Res. 2017 Dec;10(12):1981-1990
pubmed: 28801991
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Feb;36(2):836-54
pubmed: 22155284
Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Jul;119(7):1560-77
pubmed: 18456550
Brain Res. 2005 Dec 20;1066(1-2):147-57
pubmed: 16325159
J Child Neurol. 2004 Sep;19(9):666-74
pubmed: 15563012
Clin Neurophysiol. 1999 Oct;110(10):1825-30
pubmed: 10574297
J Neurodev Disord. 2015;7:33
pubmed: 26451165
J Neurosci. 2007 May 23;27(21):5546-58
pubmed: 17522300
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 5;8(1):13277
pubmed: 30185919
Curr Opin Neurol. 2015 Apr;28(2):110-6
pubmed: 25710286
Cereb Cortex. 2013 Jul;23(7):1526-32
pubmed: 22661408
J Autism Dev Disord. 2009 Mar;39(3):495-510
pubmed: 18850262
Nat Commun. 2019 Mar 19;10(1):1258
pubmed: 30890707
Genes Dev. 2008 Sep 15;22(18):2485-95
pubmed: 18794346
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Mar;47(4):1096-106
pubmed: 19162052
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2009 Oct;53(10):838-51
pubmed: 19694899
Future Neurol. 2013 Sep;8(5):583-597
pubmed: 24489482
J Exp Med. 2017 Mar 6;214(3):681-697
pubmed: 28183733
Nat Neurosci. 2005 Dec;8(12):1727-34
pubmed: 16286931
Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 Mar;123(3):424-58
pubmed: 22169062
J Child Neurol. 2016 Feb;31(2):195-202
pubmed: 26018199
Biol Psychol. 2008 Jan;77(1):25-31
pubmed: 17919805
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Dec;118(12):2544-90
pubmed: 17931964
Psychophysiology. 2005 Jul;42(4):391-406
pubmed: 16008768
J Neurosci. 2014 Jan 15;34(3):846-54
pubmed: 24431443
J Neurophysiol. 2014 Jan;111(1):91-102
pubmed: 24089402
Brain Lang. 2009 Sep;110(3):107-20
pubmed: 19457549

Auteurs

Amanda M O'Brien (AM)

Program in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, Division of Medical Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.

Laurie Bayet (L)

Department of Psychology, American University, Washington, DC, United States.

Katherine Riley (K)

Laboratories of Cognitive Neuroscience, Division of Developmental Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.

Charles A Nelson (CA)

Laboratories of Cognitive Neuroscience, Division of Developmental Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Harvard Graduate School of Education, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.

Mustafa Sahin (M)

Translational Neuroscience Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

Meera E Modi (ME)

Translational Neuroscience Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

Classifications MeSH