Widening Access to Bayesian Problem Solving.
Bayesian networks
assistive software technology
decision making
probabilistic
reasoning
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
20
12
2019
accepted:
19
03
2020
entrez:
25
4
2020
pubmed:
25
4
2020
medline:
25
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Bayesian reasoning and decision making is widely considered normative because it minimizes prediction error in a coherent way. However, it is often difficult to apply Bayesian principles to complex real world problems, which typically have many unknowns and interconnected variables. Bayesian network modeling techniques make it possible to model such problems and obtain precise predictions about the causal impact that changing the value of one variable may have on the values of other variables connected to it. But Bayesian modeling is itself complex, and has until now remained largely inaccessible to lay people. In a large scale lab experiment, we provide proof of principle that a Bayesian network modeling tool, adapted to provide basic training and guidance on the modeling process to beginners without requiring knowledge of the mathematical machinery working behind the scenes, significantly helps lay people find normative Bayesian solutions to complex problems, compared to generic training on probabilistic reasoning. We discuss the implications of this finding for the use of Bayesian network software tools in applied contexts such as security, medical, forensic, economic or environmental decision making.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32328015
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00660
pmc: PMC7160335
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
660Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Cruz, Desai, Dewitt, Hahn, Lagnado, Liefgreen, Phillips, Pilditch and Tešić.
Références
Mem Cognit. 2017 Feb;45(2):245-260
pubmed: 27826953
Crime Sci. 2016 May 25;5:9
pubmed: 27376015
Annu Rev Psychol. 2020 Jan 4;71:305-330
pubmed: 31514580
Psychol Sci. 2019 Feb;30(2):250-260
pubmed: 30597122
Top Cogn Sci. 2019 Jan;11(1):194-206
pubmed: 30585433
Psychol Sci. 2010 Mar;21(3):329-36
pubmed: 20424064
Psychol Rev. 2009 Oct;116(4):856-74
pubmed: 19839686
Psychol Rev. 2017 Apr;124(3):301-338
pubmed: 28240922
Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:223-47
pubmed: 25061673
J Biomed Inform. 2010 Aug;43(4):485-95
pubmed: 20152931
Artif Intell Med. 2016 Feb;67:75-93
pubmed: 26830286
Cogn Psychol. 2016 Jun;87:88-134
pubmed: 27261539