A detailed characteristics of bias associated with long runs of homozygosity identification based on medium density SNP microarrays.

autozygosity microarray next generation sequencing runs of homozygosity

Journal

Journal of genomics
ISSN: 1839-9940
Titre abrégé: J Genomics
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101623535

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 08 08 2019
accepted: 18 02 2020
entrez: 25 4 2020
pubmed: 25 4 2020
medline: 25 4 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In the present study, runs of homozygosity (ROH) detected with the use of a standard bovine 54k single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping assay and two different ROH detection approaches, based on 50 (M1) or 15 (M2) consecutive SNPs, were compared with results of whole genome sequencing. Both microarray-based methods accurately recognised medium-sized ROH, however, it was found that M2 method seemed to better than M1 identify short ROH, but highly overestimated their number, leading to numerous false positive calls. Moreover, long ROH identified with microarray data tended to break into shorter segments in sequencing data because of the presence of regions with high heterozygosity within the ROH sequences. This may indicate, that these long ROH are formed by closely positioned shorter homozygous segments that may be of older origin or may be created by two similar but not identical haplotypes, showing minor internal recombination signs. Such finding also suggests that at least some of the results of previous studies in regard to long ROH may be biased leading to inaccurate estimations of genomes autozygosity via ROH classification into length categories.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32328205
doi: 10.7150/jgen.39147
pii: jgenv08p0043
pmc: PMC7171384
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

43-48

Informations de copyright

© The author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

Références

Bioinformatics. 2009 Jul 15;25(14):1754-60
pubmed: 19451168
J Anim Breed Genet. 2013 Aug;130(4):286-93
pubmed: 23855630
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 11;104(50):19942-7
pubmed: 18077426
J Appl Genet. 2016 Nov;57(4):527-530
pubmed: 26803654
Gigascience. 2015 Oct 26;4:49
pubmed: 26504517
Sci Adv. 2019 May 29;5(5):eaau0757
pubmed: 31149628
Genet Sel Evol. 2013 Oct 29;45:42
pubmed: 24168655
Biology (Basel). 2012 Dec 14;1(3):895-905
pubmed: 24832523
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57772
pubmed: 23469237
BMC Genomics. 2011 Sep 23;12:460
pubmed: 21943305
Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 15;25(16):2078-9
pubmed: 19505943
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 9;13(7):e0200069
pubmed: 29985951
Am J Hum Genet. 2008 Sep;83(3):359-72
pubmed: 18760389
BMC Genet. 2012 Aug 14;13:70
pubmed: 22888858
BMC Genomics. 2018 Jan 30;19(1):106
pubmed: 29378520
J Appl Genet. 2014 May;55(2):197-208
pubmed: 24566962

Auteurs

Tomasz Szmatoła (T)

University Centre of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Al. Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Kraków, Poland.
National Research Institute of Animal Production, Department of Animal Molecular Biology, Krakowska 1, 32-083 Balice, Poland.

Artur Gurgul (A)

University Centre of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Al. Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Kraków, Poland.
National Research Institute of Animal Production, Department of Animal Molecular Biology, Krakowska 1, 32-083 Balice, Poland.

Igor Jasielczuk (I)

University Centre of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agriculture in Kraków, Al. Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Kraków, Poland.
National Research Institute of Animal Production, Department of Animal Molecular Biology, Krakowska 1, 32-083 Balice, Poland.

Weiwei Fu (W)

College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China.

Katarzyna Ropka-Molik (K)

National Research Institute of Animal Production, Department of Animal Molecular Biology, Krakowska 1, 32-083 Balice, Poland.

Classifications MeSH