Rehabilitation following shoulder arthroplasty in the United Kingdom National Health Service: A survey of publicly facing information.
protocol
rehabilitation
shoulder arthroplasty
shoulder replacement
survey
Journal
Musculoskeletal care
ISSN: 1557-0681
Titre abrégé: Musculoskeletal Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101181344
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2020
09 2020
Historique:
received:
17
03
2020
revised:
22
03
2020
accepted:
27
03
2020
pubmed:
25
4
2020
medline:
29
10
2021
entrez:
25
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The prevalence of shoulder arthroplasty (SA) is rising, but there is limited research evaluating rehabilitation following SA and whether there is an optimal approach remains unknown. The aim of this study was to understand current National Health Service (NHS) practice for rehabilitation following SA as a platform for conducting much needed further research. Two reviewers independently undertook electronic searches for publicly available information sheets (PIS) from websites of NHS Trusts that included detail about rehabilitation following SA, for example, duration of immobilisation. One reviewer extracted data, and a second reviewer verified this. Not required. Forty-three PIS from 40 Trusts were identified. Twenty-four referred to more than one type of arthroplasty (anatomic, reverse and hemiarthroplasty) but did not describe different approaches to rehabilitation based on prosthesis type. Twenty-five PIS provided some instruction regarding movement restrictions, which varied considerably. All PIS referred to postoperative immobilisation, typically with a sling, with median duration of 4 weeks (range 0 to 8). Thirty-four PIS reported commencing passive exercise immediately. Median time to commencing active exercise was 4 weeks (range 1 to 6) and 5 weeks (range 1 to 16) for resisted exercise. Median time expected to return to driving was 6 weeks (range 3 to 12) and general work 12 weeks (range 3 to 26). This study has highlighted significant heterogeneity between rehabilitation approaches following SA, not previously reported in the United Kingdom, with a lack of specific rehabilitation PIS for different prosthesis types. Our results will facilitate evaluation of rehabilitation strategies in future research.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
359-364Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : PDF-2018-11-ST2-005
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Références
Bullock, G. S., Garrigues, G. E., Ledbetter, L., & Kennedy, J. (2019). A systematic review of proposed rehabilitation guidelines following anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 49(5), 337-346. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2019.8616
Craig, R. S., Lane, J. C. E., Carr, A. J., Furniss, D., Collins, G. S., & Rees, J. L. (2019). Serious adverse events and lifetime risk of reoperation after elective shoulder replacement: Population based cohort study using hospital episode statistics for England. BMJ (Online), 364, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l298
Denard, P. J., & Lädermann, A. (2016). Immediate versus delayed passive range of motion following total shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 25(12), 1918-1924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.07.032
Edwards, P. K., Ebert, J. R., Littlewood, C., Ackland, T., & Wang, A. (2018). Effectiveness of formal physical therapy following total shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review. Shoulder & Elbow, 12(2), 136-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758573218812038
Hagen, M. S., Allahabadi, S., Zhang, A. L., Feeley, B. T., Grace, T., & Ma, C. B. (2020). A randomized single-blinded trial of early rehabilitation versus immobilization after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 29(3), 442-450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.10.005
King, G. J. W., Richards, R. R., Zuckerman, J. D., Blasier, R., Diliman, C., Friedman, R. J., … Woo, S. L. Y. (1999). A standardized method for assessment of elbow function. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 8(4), 351-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1058-2746(99)90159-3
Kirsch, J., & Namdari, S. (2020). Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. JBJS Reviews, 8(2), e0129. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.jopa.19.00025
Littlewood, C., Bateman, M., Cooke, K., Hennnings, S., Cookson, T., Bromley, K., … Foster, N. E. (2019). Protocol for a multi-centre pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial with a nested qualitative study: Rehabilitation following rotator cuff repair (the RaCeR study). Trials, 20(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3407-3
Sheps, D., Bouliane, M., Styles-Tripp, F., Beaupre, L., Saraswat, M., Luciak-Corea, C., … Balyk, R. (2015). Early mobilisation following mini-open rotator cuff repair: A randomised control trial. The Bone & Joint Journal, 97(9), 1257-1263. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B9.35250
Sheps, D. M., Silveira, A., Beaupre, L., Styles-Tripp, F., Balyk, R., Lalani, A., … Bouliane, M. (2019). Early active motion versus sling immobilization after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A randomized controlled trial. Arthroscopy, 35(3), 749-760.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.10.139