Examining the Reach and Impact of a Systematic Review Service.

Expert searcher PRISMA health sciences librarians librarian’s role library services reporting guidelines service evaluation systematic reviews

Journal

Medical reference services quarterly
ISSN: 1540-9597
Titre abrégé: Med Ref Serv Q
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8219208

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez: 25 4 2020
pubmed: 25 4 2020
medline: 23 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This case study describes the process librarians at a large research university used to evaluate a systematic review searching service. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched for studies with a local, health sciences author. Data on librarian involvement, search quality, and standards adherence were recorded. Results of the assessment indicate a gradual increase in librarian authorship or acknowledgement over time, a moderate improvement in adherence to reporting standards over time, and insight into which departments better adhere to standards. Ideas for improving the quality and reach of the service while ensuring sustainability are discussed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32329673
doi: 10.1080/02763869.2020.1726150
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

125-138

Auteurs

Heather S Healy (HS)

Hardin Library for the Health Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.

Matt Regan (M)

Hardin Library for the Health Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.

Jennifer Deberg (J)

Hardin Library for the Health Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.

Articles similaires

Humans Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome Self-Management Athletes Systematic Reviews as Topic
Humans Perioperative Period Systematic Reviews as Topic Regression Analysis Developing Countries
Humans Child Adolescent Nervous System Diseases Professional Role
Switzerland Humans Physical Therapy Specialty Professional Role Evidence-Based Practice

Classifications MeSH