High-Flow Oxygen Therapy During Exercise Training in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Chronic Hypoxemia: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Blood Gas Analysis
Chronic Disease
Confidence Intervals
Dyspnea
/ blood
Exercise
Exercise Tolerance
/ physiology
Female
Humans
Linear Models
Male
Middle Aged
Muscle Strength
Noninvasive Ventilation
Oxygen
/ administration & dosage
Oxygen Inhalation Therapy
/ methods
Patient Satisfaction
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
/ blood
Single-Blind Method
Walk Test
Journal
Physical therapy
ISSN: 1538-6724
Titre abrégé: Phys Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0022623
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 08 2020
12 08 2020
Historique:
revised:
25
10
2019
accepted:
05
02
2020
pubmed:
25
4
2020
medline:
5
9
2020
entrez:
25
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The study aimed to evaluate whether high-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) during training was more effective than oxygen in improving exercise capacity in hypoxemic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A total of 171 patients with COPD and chronic hypoxemia were consecutively recruited in 8 rehabilitation hospitals in a randomized controlled trial. Cycle-ergometer exercise training was used in 20 supervised sessions at iso inspiratory oxygen fraction in both groups. Pre- and post-training endurance time (Tlim), 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), respiratory and limb muscle strength, arterial blood gases, Barthel Index, Barthel Dyspnea Index, COPD Assessment Test, Maugeri Respiratory Failure questionnaire, and patient satisfaction were evaluated. Due to 15.4% and 24.1% dropout rates, 71 and 66 patients were analyzed in HFOT and Venturi mask (V-mask) groups, respectively. Exercise capacity significantly improved after training in both groups with similar patient satisfaction. Between-group difference in post-training improvement in 6MWD (mean: 17.14 m; 95% CI = 0.87 to 33.43 m) but not in Tlim (mean: 141.85 seconds; 95% CI = -18.72 to 302.42 seconds) was significantly higher in HFOT. The minimal clinically important difference of Tlim was reached by 47% of patients in the V-mask group and 56% of patients in the HFOT group, whereas the minimal clinically important difference of 6MWD was reached by 51% of patients in the V-mask group and 69% of patients in the HFOT group, respectively. In patients with hypoxemic COPD, exercise training is effective in improving exercise capacity. The addition of HFOT during exercise training is not more effective than oxygen through V-mask in improving endurance time, the primary outcome, whereas it is more effective in improving walking distance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32329780
pii: 5823911
doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa076
doi:
Substances chimiques
Oxygen
S88TT14065
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03322787']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1249-1259Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Physical Therapy Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.