Agonist Effects of Propranolol on Non-Tumor Human Breast Cells.
Actin Cytoskeleton
/ drug effects
Actin Depolymerizing Factors
/ metabolism
Actins
/ metabolism
Adrenergic beta-Agonists
/ pharmacology
Breast
/ cytology
Cell Adhesion
/ drug effects
Cell Line
Cell Line, Tumor
Cell Proliferation
/ drug effects
Cyclic AMP
/ biosynthesis
Female
Humans
Isoproterenol
/ pharmacology
Lim Kinases
/ metabolism
Propranolol
/ pharmacology
Protein Stability
/ drug effects
Signal Transduction
/ drug effects
Time Factors
MCF-10A
biased agonism
cell adhesion
propranolol
β-blocker
Journal
Cells
ISSN: 2073-4409
Titre abrégé: Cells
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101600052
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 04 2020
22 04 2020
Historique:
received:
13
03
2020
revised:
17
04
2020
accepted:
20
04
2020
entrez:
26
4
2020
pubmed:
26
4
2020
medline:
20
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The β-blocker propranolol (PROP) has been proposed as a repurposed treatment for breast cancer. The similarity of action between β-agonists and antagonists found on breast cells encouraged us to compare PROP and isoproterenol (ISO, agonist) signaling pathways on a human breast cell line. Cell proliferation was measured by cell counting and DNA-synthesis. Cell adhesion was measured counting the cells that remained adhered to the plastic after different treatments. Changes in actin cytoskeleton were observed by fluorescence staining and Western Blot. ISO and PROP caused a diminution of cell proliferation and an increase of cell adhesion, reverted by the pure β-antagonist ICI-118551. ISO and PROP induced a reorganization of actin cytoskeleton increasing F-actin, p-COFILIN and p-LIMK. While ISO elicited a marked enhancement of cAMP concentrations and an increase of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) and cAMP response element-binding protein (CREB) phosphorylation, PROP did not. Clathrin-mediated endocytosis inhibition or β-arrestin1 dominant-negative mutant abrogated PROP-induced cell adhesion and COFILIN phosphorylation. The fact that PROP has been proposed as an adjuvant drug for breast cancer makes it necessary to determine the specific action of PROP in breast models. These results provide an explanation for the discrepancies observed between experimental results and clinical evidence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32331276
pii: cells9041036
doi: 10.3390/cells9041036
pmc: PMC7226086
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Actin Depolymerizing Factors
0
Actins
0
Adrenergic beta-Agonists
0
Propranolol
9Y8NXQ24VQ
Cyclic AMP
E0399OZS9N
LIMK1 protein, human
EC 2.7.11.1
Lim Kinases
EC 2.7.11.1
Isoproterenol
L628TT009W
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Oncol Rep. 2019 Jan;41(1):341-350
pubmed: 30542705
Cells. 2016 Jan 12;5(1):
pubmed: 26771645
J Biol Chem. 2000 Oct 6;275(40):30817-25
pubmed: 10882740
Sci Signal. 2018 Aug 21;11(544):
pubmed: 30131371
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Mar 1;18(5):1201-6
pubmed: 22186256
Int J Cancer. 2016 Jul 1;139(1):212-9
pubmed: 26916107
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011 Aug 02;8(9):511-2
pubmed: 21808268
Semin Cancer Biol. 2013 Dec;23(6 Pt B):533-42
pubmed: 24012659
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1970 Jan-Feb;11(1):112-20
pubmed: 5410893
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2008 Jan;294(1):L69-78
pubmed: 17993590
J Biol Chem. 1997 Dec 19;272(51):32507-12
pubmed: 9405462
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
J Biol Chem. 1992 Oct 5;267(28):20481-8
pubmed: 1328200
EMBO J. 2005 Feb 9;24(3):473-86
pubmed: 15660133
Cancer Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;37(6):881-5
pubmed: 24075077
FASEB J. 2014 Mar;28(3):1342-54
pubmed: 24308976
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Dec 7;107(49):21028-33
pubmed: 21078978
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013 Mar;12(3):205-16
pubmed: 23411724
Biochem Pharmacol. 1995 Jun 29;50(1):91-6
pubmed: 7605350
Nat Chem Biol. 2011 Aug 21;7(10):692-700
pubmed: 21857662
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;42(6):1852-61
pubmed: 24536096
Eur J Pharmacol. 1970;13(1):6-14
pubmed: 5496930
J Pain. 2015 Dec;16(12):1321-1333
pubmed: 26456674
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000 Mar;60(2):153-66
pubmed: 10845278
Oncotarget. 2014 Oct 30;5(20):10058-69
pubmed: 25375203
Mol Pharmacol. 2003 Dec;64(6):1357-69
pubmed: 14645666
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2019 Jan-Mar;22(1):21-26
pubmed: 30692755
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Apr 7;112(14):4483-8
pubmed: 25831532
Dev Biol. 2015 Sep 15;405(2):237-49
pubmed: 26169470
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1990;116(3):303-6
pubmed: 2164516
Clin Breast Cancer. 2015 Dec;15(6):426-31
pubmed: 26516037
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2012 May;4(3):113-25
pubmed: 22590485
Biochem Soc Trans. 2017 Feb 8;45(1):79-88
pubmed: 28202661
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2017 Jan;26(1):86-93
pubmed: 26649549
Oncogene. 2007 May 31;26(26):3777-88
pubmed: 17260025
Mol Cancer Res. 2018 Mar;16(3):508-516
pubmed: 29330291
Anticancer Res. 1991 Mar-Apr;11(2):677-80
pubmed: 1648332
Br J Pharmacol. 2012 May;166(2):721-36
pubmed: 22122228
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2012 Jan;46(1):48-54
pubmed: 22210825
Oncotarget. 2010 Nov;1(7):628-38
pubmed: 21317458
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2007 Feb;374(5-6):385-98
pubmed: 17211601
J Biol Chem. 2010 May 7;285(19):14318-29
pubmed: 20207744
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009 Nov;297(5):H1697-710
pubmed: 19734360
Int J Oncol. 2002 Jul;21(1):153-7
pubmed: 12063562
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 20;8(8):e71980
pubmed: 23977191
Oncotarget. 2011 Oct;2(10):797-809
pubmed: 22006582
Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2017;17(8):756-766
pubmed: 28359245
Mol Pharmacol. 2014 Mar;85(3):492-509
pubmed: 24366668
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 16;104(42):16657-62
pubmed: 17925438
J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2017 Mar;22(1):43-57
pubmed: 28074314
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2004 Apr;25(4):186-92
pubmed: 15063082