Partnering With Family Members to Detect Delirium in Critically Ill Patients.


Journal

Critical care medicine
ISSN: 1530-0293
Titre abrégé: Crit Care Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0355501

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 26 4 2020
medline: 19 5 2021
entrez: 26 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of family-administered tools to detect delirium in critically ill patients. Diagnostic accuracy study. Large, tertiary care academic hospital in a single-payer health system. Consecutive, eligible patients with at least one family member present (dyads) and a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale greater than or equal to -3, no primary direct brain injury, the ability to provide informed consent (both patient and family member), the ability to communicate with research staff, and anticipated to remain admitted in the ICU for at least a further 24 hours to complete all assessments at least once. None. Family-administered delirium assessments (Family Confusion Assessment Method and Sour Seven) were completed once daily. A board-certified neuropsychiatrist and team of ICU research nurses conducted the reference standard assessments of delirium (based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, criteria) once daily for a maximum of 5 days. The mean age of the 147 included patients was 56.1 years (SD, 16.2 yr), 61% of whom were male. Family members (n = 147) were most commonly spouses (n = 71, 48.3%) of patients. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve on the Family Confusion Assessment Method was 65.0% (95% CI, 60.0-70.0%), 71.0% (95% CI, 66.0-76.0%) for possible delirium (cutpoint of 4) on the Sour Seven and 67.0% (95% CI, 62.0-72.0%) for delirium (cutpoint of 9) on the Sour Seven. These area under the receiver operating characteristic curves were lower than the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (standard of care) and Confusion Assessment Method for ICU. Combining the Family Confusion Assessment Method or Sour Seven with the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist or Confusion Assessment Method for ICU resulted in area under the receiver operating characteristic curves that were not significantly better, or worse for some combinations, than the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist or Confusion Assessment Method for ICU alone. Adding the Family Confusion Assessment Method and Sour Seven to the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist and Confusion Assessment Method for ICU improved sensitivity at the expense of specificity. Family-administered delirium detection is feasible and has fair, but lower diagnostic accuracy than clinical assessments using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist and Confusion Assessment Method for ICU. Family proxy assessments are essential for determining baseline cognitive function. Engaging and empowering families of critically ill patients warrant further study.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32332281
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004367
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

954-961

Subventions

Organisme : CIHR
Pays : Canada

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Auteurs

Karla D Krewulak (KD)

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services & University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

E Wesley Ely (EW)

Tennessee Valley Veteran's Affairs Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center (VA GRECC), Critical Illness, Brain Dysfunction, and Survivorship (CIBS) Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

Judy E Davidson (JE)

Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA.

Zahinoor Ismail (Z)

Department of Community Health Sciences & O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry & Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Bonnie G Sept (BG)

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services & University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Henry T Stelfox (HT)

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Alberta Health Services & University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Department of Community Health Sciences & O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH