Applying RE-AIM to Evaluate the External Validity of Weight Gain Prevention Interventions in Young Adults: A Systematic Review.
Journal
Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP
ISSN: 1550-5022
Titre abrégé: J Public Health Manag Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9505213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed:
26
4
2020
medline:
16
10
2021
entrez:
26
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this review was to use RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) to assess the extent to which weight gain prevention studies targeting young adults reported on elements of external validity. Systematic review. Articles of interest included a lifestyle/behavioral intervention targeting weight gain prevention. Eligibility criteria included the following: study design of randomized controlled trials, quasi-randomized control trials, or natural experiments; average participant age between 18 and 35 years; study duration of at least 12 months; and published in English between January 2008 and May 2018. Studies had to report weight or body mass index as a measured outcome and were excluded if they were paired with smoking cessation programs, were conducted in specific groups (ie, pregnant women, breast cancer survivors), or were follow-ups to weight loss studies. After removing duplicates, the search yielded 11426 articles. Titles and abstracts were screened by 1 reviewer; 144 articles were assessed in a full-text review by 2 reviewers. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Nine studies (13 articles) were included in the review. Reported elements of the RE-AIM framework. A total of 9 studies met the selection criteria. All studies lacked full reporting on external validity elements. Of the total of 60 RE-AIM reporting criteria, 8 were reported by all 9 studies, 26 criteria were reported by fewer than 4 studies, and 22 criteria were not reported by any of the studies. There remains inadequate reporting of elements of external validity and generalizability in weight gain prevention studies. This is a significant scientific constraint that limits the information required to disseminate and implement prevention of weight gain interventions for population impact. Standardized reporting may be needed to ensure results that demonstrate not only internal validity but also external validity and generalizability are needed to promote public health impact.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32332487
pii: 00124784-202103000-00010
doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001159
pmc: PMC7837750
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
154-165Subventions
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01 DK121475
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : T32 HL130357
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : P30 DK092950
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01 HL143360
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P50 CA095815
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Références
Gordon-Larsen P, The NS, Adair LS. Longitudinal trends in obesity in the United States from adolescence to the third decade of life. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010;18(9):1801–1804.
Lewis CE, Jacobs DR Jr, McCreath H, et al. Weight gain continues in the 1990s: 10-year trends in weight and overweight from the CARDIA study. Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151(12):1172–1181.
Woolf SH, Schoomaker H. Life expectancy and mortality rates in the United States, 1959-2017. JAMA. 2019;322(20):1996–2016.
Dietz WH. Obesity and excessive weight gain in young adults: new targets for prevention. JAMA. 2017;318(3):241–242.
Truesdale KP, Stevens J, Lewis CE, Schreiner PJ, Loria CM, Cai J. Changes in risk factors for cardiovascular disease by baseline weight status in young adults who maintain or gain weight over 15 years: the CARDIA study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2006;30(9):1397–1407.
Laska MN, Pelletier JE, Larson NI, Story M. Interventions for weight gain prevention during the transition to young adulthood: a review of the literature. J Adolesc Health. 2012;50(4):324–333.
Hutfless S, Gudzune KA, Maruthur N, et al. Strategies to prevent weight gain in adults: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45(6):e41–e51.
Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin & Company; 2002.
Willmott TJ, Pang B, Rundle-Thiele S, Badejo A. Weight management in young adults: systematic review of electronic health intervention components and outcomes. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(2):e10265.
Partridge SR, Juan SJ, McGeechan K, Bauman A, Allman-Farinelli M. Poor quality of external validity reporting limits generalizability of overweight and/or obesity lifestyle prevention interventions in young adults: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2015;16(1):13–31.
Glasgow RE, Emmons KM. How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:413–433.
Huebschmann AG, Leavitt IM, Glasgow RE. Making health research matter: a call to increase attention to external validity. Annu Rev Public Health. 2019;40:45–63.
Pinnock H, Barwick M, Carpenter CR, et al. Standards for reporting implementation studies (StaRI) statement. BMJ. 2017;356:i6795.
Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, et al. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134(8):663–694.
Glasgow RE, Estabrooks PE. Pragmatic applications of RE-AIM for health care initiatives in community and clinical settings. Prev Chronic Dis. 2018;15:E02.
Glasgow RE, Huebschmann AG, Brownson RC. Expanding the CONSORT figure: increasing transparency in reporting on external validity. Am J Prev Med. 2018;55(3):422–430.
Loudon K, Treweek S, Sullivan F, Donnan P, Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M. The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose. BMJ. 2015;350:h2147.
Glasgow RE, Harden SM, Gaglio B, et al. RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework: adapting to new science and practice with a 20-year review. Front Public Health. 2019;7:64.
RE-AIM. Welcome to RE-AIM.org . re-aim.org . Published 2019. Accessed February 2, 2019.
Booth A, Clarke M, Dooley G, et al. The nuts and bolts of PROSPERO: an international prospective register of systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2012;1(1):2.
Bertz F, Pacanowski CR, Levitsky DA. Frequent self-weighing with electronic graphic feedback to prevent age-related weight gain in young adults. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015;23(10):2009–2014.
Wing RR, Tate DF, Espeland MA, et al. Innovative self-regulation strategies to reduce weight gain in young adults: the Study of Novel Approaches to Weight Gain Prevention (SNAP) randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(6):755–762.
Biddle SJ, Edwardson CL, Wilmot EG, et al. A randomised controlled trial to reduce sedentary time in young adults at risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: Project STAND (Sedentary Time ANd Diabetes). PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0143398.
Greene GW, White AA, Hoerr SL, et al. Impact of an online healthful eating and physical activity program for college students. Am J Health Promot. 2012;27(2):e47–e58.
Kattelmann KK, Bredbenner CB, White AA, et al. The effects of Young Adults Eating and Active for Health (YEAH): a theory-based Web-delivered intervention. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014;46(6):S27–S41.
Katterman SN, Goldstein SP, Butryn ML, Forman EM, Lowe MR. Efficacy of an acceptance-based behavioral intervention for weight gain prevention in young adult women. J Contextual Behav Sci. 2014;3(1):45–50.
Lytle LA, Laska MN, Linde JA, et al. Weight-gain reduction among 2-year college students: the CHOICES RCT. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52(2):183–191.
Metzgar CJ, Nickols-Richardson SM. Effects of nutrition education on weight gain prevention: a randomized controlled trial. Nutr J. 2016;15:31.
Valve P, Lehtinen-Jacks S, Eriksson T, et al. LINDA—a solution-focused low-intensity intervention aimed at improving health behaviors of young females: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1044.
Wilmot EG, Davies MJ, Edwardson CL, et al. Rationale and study design for a randomised controlled trial to reduce sedentary time in adults at risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: project stand (Sedentary Time ANd diabetes). BMC Public Health. 2011;11:908.
Moe SG, Lytle LA, Nanney MS, Linde JA, Laska MN. Recruiting and retaining young adults in a weight gain prevention trial: lessons learned from the CHOICES study. Clin Trials. 2016;13(2):205–213.
Metzgar CJ, Nickols-Richardson SM. Determinants of weight gain prevention in young adult and midlife women: study design and protocol of a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2015;4(1):e36.
Kattelmann KK, White AA, Greene GW, et al. Development of Young Adults Eating and Active for Health (YEAH) Internet-based intervention via a community-based participatory research model. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014;46(2):S10–S25.
Covidence systematic review software, Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia. www.covidence.org .
Harden SM, Gaglio B, Shoup JA, et al. Fidelity to and comparative results across behavioral interventions evaluated through the RE-AIM framework: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2015;4:155.
Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.
Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. London, England: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
Green LW, Glasgow RE. Evaluating the relevance, generalization, and applicability of research: issues in external validation and translation methodology. Eval Health Prof. 2006;29(1):126–153.
Tomoaia-Cotisel A, Scammon DL, Waitzman NJ, et al. Context matters: the experience of 14 research teams in systematically reporting contextual factors important for practice change. Ann Fam Med. 2013;11(suppl 1):S115–S123.
RE-AIM. Applying the RE-AIM framework. About RE-AIM. http://www.re-aim.org/about/applying-the-re-aim-framework . Accessed November 18, 2019.
Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322–1327.
Hebden L, Chey T, Allman-Farinelli M. Lifestyle intervention for preventing weight gain in young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Obes Rev. 2012;13(8):692–710.
Hayba N, Partridge S, Nour M, Grech A, Allman Farinelli M. Effectiveness of lifestyle interventions for preventing harmful weight gain among young adults from lower socioeconomic status and ethnically diverse backgrounds: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2018;19(3):333–346.
Gaglio B, Shoup JA, Glasgow RE. The RE-AIM framework: a systematic review of use over time. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(6):e38–e46.
Boutron I, Altman DG, Moher D, Schulz KF, Ravaud P. CONSORT statement for randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatments: a 2017 update and a CONSORT extension for nonpharmacologic trial abstracts. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(1):40–47.
Glasgow RE, Askew S, Purcell P, et al. Use of RE-AIM to address health inequities: application in a low-income community health center-based weight loss and hypertension self-management program. Transl Behav Med. 2013;3(2):200–210.
McCrabb S, Lane C, Hall A, et al. Scaling-up evidence-based obesity interventions: a systematic review assessing intervention adaptations and effectiveness and quantifying the scale-up penalty. Obes Rev. 2019.
National Institutes of Health. Reviewer Guidance on Rigor and Transparency: Research Project Grant and Mentored Career Development Applications. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2019.
Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687.