Wetland buffer zones for nitrogen and phosphorus retention: Impacts of soil type, hydrology and vegetation.

Denitrification Eutrophication Nutrient removal Paludiculture Peat soil Plant uptake Restoration

Journal

The Science of the total environment
ISSN: 1879-1026
Titre abrégé: Sci Total Environ
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0330500

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Jul 2020
Historique:
received: 31 12 2019
revised: 09 04 2020
accepted: 13 04 2020
pubmed: 26 4 2020
medline: 11 7 2020
entrez: 26 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Wetland buffer zones (WBZs) are riparian areas that form a transition between terrestrial and aquatic environments and are well-known to remove agricultural water pollutants such as nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P). This review attempts to merge and compare data on the nutrient load, nutrient loss and nutrient removal and/or retention from multiple studies of various WBZs termed as riparian mineral soil wetlands, groundwater-charged peatlands (i.e. fens) and floodplains. Two different soil types ('organic' and 'mineral'), four different main water sources ('groundwater', 'precipitation', 'surface runoff/drain discharge', and 'river inundation') and three different vegetation classes ('arboraceous', 'herbaceous' and 'aerenchymous') were considered separately for data analysis. The studied WBZs are situated within the temperate and continental climatic regions that are commonly found in northern-central Europe, northern USA and Canada. Surprisingly, only weak differences for the nutrient removal/retention capability were found if the three WBZ types were directly compared. The results of our study reveal that for example the nitrate retention efficiency of organic soils (53 ± 28%; mean ± sd) is only slightly higher than that of mineral soils (50 ± 32%). Variance in load had a stronger influence than soil type on the N retention in WBZs. However, organic soils in fens tend to be sources of dissolved organic N and soluble reactive P, particularly when the fens have become degraded due to drainage and past agricultural usage. The detailed consideration of water sources indicated that average nitrate removal efficiencies were highest for ground water (76 ± 25%) and lowest for river water (35 ± 24%). No significant pattern for P retention emerged; however, the highest absolute removal appeared if the P source was river water. The harvesting of vegetation will minimise potential P loss from rewetted WBZs and plant biomass yield may promote circular economy value chains and provide compensation to land owners for restored land now unsuitable for conventional farming.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32334232
pii: S0048-9697(20)32226-9
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138709
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Soil 0
Phosphorus 27YLU75U4W
Nitrogen N762921K75

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

138709

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Craig R Walton (CR)

Chemical Analytics and Biogeochemistry, Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries Berlin (IGB), Berlin, Germany.

Dominik Zak (D)

Chemical Analytics and Biogeochemistry, Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries Berlin (IGB), Berlin, Germany; Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, 8600 Silkeborg, Denmark. Electronic address: doz@bios.au.dk.

Joachim Audet (J)

Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, 8600 Silkeborg, Denmark.

Rasmus Jes Petersen (RJ)

Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, 8600 Silkeborg, Denmark.

Jelena Lange (J)

Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, University of Greifswald, 17487 Greifswald, Germany.

Claudia Oehmke (C)

Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, University of Greifswald, 17487 Greifswald, Germany.

Wendelin Wichtmann (W)

Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, University of Greifswald, 17487 Greifswald, Germany.

Jürgen Kreyling (J)

Institute of Botany and Landscape Ecology, University of Greifswald, 17487 Greifswald, Germany.

Mateusz Grygoruk (M)

Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Institute of Environmental Engineering, Department of Hydrology, Meteorology and Water Management, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland.

Ewa Jabłońska (E)

Faculty of Biology, Biological and Chemical Research Centre, University of Warsaw, 02-089 Warsaw, Poland.

Wiktor Kotowski (W)

Faculty of Biology, Biological and Chemical Research Centre, University of Warsaw, 02-089 Warsaw, Poland.

Marta M Wiśniewska (MM)

Faculty of Biology, Biological and Chemical Research Centre, University of Warsaw, 02-089 Warsaw, Poland.

Rafael Ziegler (R)

Getidos, University of Greifswald, 17487 Greifswald, Germany.

Carl C Hoffmann (CC)

Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, 8600 Silkeborg, Denmark.

Articles similaires

Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi
Glycogen Storage Disease Type II Humans Critical Pathways Europe
Nigeria Environmental Monitoring Solid Waste Waste Disposal Facilities Refuse Disposal
Cameroon Humans Uranium Trace Elements Environmental Monitoring

Classifications MeSH