Laparoscopic posterior cruroplasty: a patient tailored approach.


Journal

Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery
ISSN: 1248-9204
Titre abrégé: Hernia
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9715168

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2022
Historique:
received: 07 02 2020
accepted: 06 04 2020
pubmed: 27 4 2020
medline: 20 4 2022
entrez: 27 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Different surgical variations have been described for laparoscopic crural repair however, the technique is not standardized and left to the surgeons' preference. The purpose of this study is to describe a standardized "patient tailored" approach for laparoscopic posterior cruroplasty in the setting of elective hiatal hernia repair. Retrospective single-center study was conducted (November 2015 to November 2019). The technical aspects of a standardized "patient tailored" laparoscopic posterior crural repair are described. Perioperative outcomes and patients' quality of life, measured with the disease specific Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) and generic Short Form-36 (SF-36), were analyzed. One hundred and forty-one patients were treated for symptomatic hiatal hernia according to the described "patient tailored" concept. Overall, 102 (72.3%) patients underwent simple suture repair while simple suture repair buttressed with biosynthetic resorbable U shaped mesh [Phasix ST The application of a standardized "patient tailored" concept for laparoscopic posterior cruroplasty seems safe and effective in the medium-term follow-up with promising perioperative outcomes and quality of life improvement. This approach may be valuable to assure procedure reproducibility, standardization, and to uniformly interpret the outcomes.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Different surgical variations have been described for laparoscopic crural repair however, the technique is not standardized and left to the surgeons' preference.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study is to describe a standardized "patient tailored" approach for laparoscopic posterior cruroplasty in the setting of elective hiatal hernia repair.
METHODS
Retrospective single-center study was conducted (November 2015 to November 2019). The technical aspects of a standardized "patient tailored" laparoscopic posterior crural repair are described. Perioperative outcomes and patients' quality of life, measured with the disease specific Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) and generic Short Form-36 (SF-36), were analyzed.
RESULTS
One hundred and forty-one patients were treated for symptomatic hiatal hernia according to the described "patient tailored" concept. Overall, 102 (72.3%) patients underwent simple suture repair while simple suture repair buttressed with biosynthetic resorbable U shaped mesh [Phasix ST
CONCLUSION
The application of a standardized "patient tailored" concept for laparoscopic posterior cruroplasty seems safe and effective in the medium-term follow-up with promising perioperative outcomes and quality of life improvement. This approach may be valuable to assure procedure reproducibility, standardization, and to uniformly interpret the outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32335756
doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02188-5
pii: 10.1007/s10029-020-02188-5
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

619-626

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© 2020. Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Kahrilas PJ, Kim HC, Pandolfino JE (2008) Approaches to the diagnosis and grading of hiatal hernia. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 22(4):601–616
doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2007.12.007 pubmed: 18656819 pmcid: 2548324
Polomsky M, Siddall KA, Salvador R, Dubecz A, Donahue LA, Raymond D, Jones C, Watson TJ, Peters JH (2009) Association of kyphosis and spinal skeletal abnormalities with intrathoracic stomach: a link toward understanding its pathogenesis. J Am Coll Surg 208(4):562–569
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.01.004 pubmed: 19476791
Dallemagne B, Kohnen L, Perretta S, Weerts J, Markiewicz S, Jehaes C (2011) Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. Long-term follow-up reveals good clinical outcome despite high radiological recurrence rate. Ann Surg 253(2):291–296
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181ff44c0 pubmed: 21217518
Aiolfi A, Asti E, Bernardi D, Bonitta G, Rausa E, Siboni S, Bonavina L (2018) Early results of magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 52:82–88
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.02.041 pubmed: 29471155
Iossa A, Silecchia G (2019) Mid-term safety profile evaluation of Bio-A absorbable synthetic mesh as cruroplasty reinforcement. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06676-3
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06676-3 pubmed: 30675663
Asti E, Sironi A, Bonitta G, Lovece A, Milito P, Bonavina L (2017) Crura augmentation with Bio-A
doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1603-1 pubmed: 28396955
https://www.sages.org/publications/guidelines/guidelines-for-surgical-treatment-of-gastroesophageal-reflux-disease-gerd/ . Accessed 20 Feb 2020
Deeken CR, Matthews BD (2013) Characterization of the mechanical strength, resorption properties, and histologic characteristics of a fully absorbable material (Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate-PHASIX Mesh) in a porcine model of hernia repair. ISRN Surg 2013:238067
doi: 10.1155/2013/238067 pubmed: 23781348 pmcid: 3679684
Bona D, Aiolfi A, Asti E, Bonavina L (2020) Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease and hiatus hernia: proposal for standardization using the “critical view” concept. Updates Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00732-7  (Epub ahead of print)
doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00732-7 pubmed: 33315230 pmcid: 8184540
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae pubmed: 15273542 pmcid: 1360123
Velanovich V (1998) Comparison of generic (SF-36) vs. disease-specific (GERD-HRQL) quality-of-life scales for gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Gastrointest Surg 2(2):141–145
doi: 10.1016/S1091-255X(98)80004-8 pubmed: 9834409
Kohn GP, Price RR, DeMeester SR, Zehetner J, Muensterer OJ, Awad Z, Mittal SK, Richardson WS, Stefanidis D, Fanelli RD (2013) SAGES guidelines committee. Guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia. Surg Endosc 27(12):4409–4428
doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3173-3 pubmed: 24018762
Core Team R (2018) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
Toupet MA (1963) Technique d’oesophago-gastroplastic avec phreno-gastropexie appliquee dans la cure radicale des hernies hiatales et comme complement de l’operation de heller dans les cardiospasmes. Mem Aca Chir 89:394
Schwameis K, Nikolic M, Castellano DGM, Steindl A, Macheck S, Riegler M, Kristo I, Zörner B, Schoppmann SF (2018) Crural closure improves outcomes of magnetic sphincter augmentation in GERD patients with hiatal hernia. Sci Rep 8(1):7319
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24322-1 pubmed: 29743599 pmcid: 5943411
Siboni S, Asti E, Milito P, Bonitta G, Sironi A, Aiolfi A, Bonavina L (2018) Impact of laparoscopic repair of large hiatus hernia on quality of life: observational cohort study. Dig Surg 20:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000490359  (Epub ahead of print)
doi: 10.1159/000490359
Wade A, Dugan A, Plymale MA, Hoskins J, Zachem A, Roth JS (2016) Hiatal hernia cruroplasty with a running barbed suture compared to interrupted suture repair. Am Surg 82(9):e271–e274
doi: 10.1177/000313481608200919 pubmed: 27670546
Powell BS, Wandrey D, Voeller GR (2013) A technique for placement of a bioabsorbable prosthesis with fibrin glue fixation for reinforcement of the crural closure during hiatal hernia repair. Hernia 17(1):81–84
doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-0915-4 pubmed: 22581201
Granderath FA, Kamolz T, Schweiger UM, Pointner R (2003) Laparoscopic refundoplication with prosthetic hiatal closure for recurrent hiatal hernia after primary failed antireflux surgery. Arch Surg 138(8):902–907
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.8.902 pubmed: 12912751
Oelschlager BK, Pellegrini CA, Hunter J, Soper N, Brunt M, Sheppard B, Jobe B, Polissar N, Mitsumori L, Nelson J, Swanstrom L (2006) Biologic prosthesis reduces recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a multicenter prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 244(4):481–490
pubmed: 16998356 pmcid: 1856552
Müller-Stich BP, Kenngott HG, Gondan M, Stock C, Linke GR, Fritz F, Nickel F, Diener MK, Gutt CN, Wente M, Büchler MW, Fischer L (2015) Use of mesh in laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a meta-analysis and risk-benefit analysis. PLoS ONE 10(10):e0139547
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139547 pubmed: 26469286 pmcid: 4607492
Antoniou SA, Koch OO, Antoniou GA, Pointner R, Granderath FA (2012) Mesh-reinforced hiatal hernia repair: a review on the effect on postoperative dysphagia and recurrence. Langenbecks Arch Surg 397(1):19–27
doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0829-0 pubmed: 21792699
Furnée E, Hazebroek E (2013) Mesh in laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature. Surg Endosc 27(11):3998–4008
doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3036-y pubmed: 23793804
Tam V, Winger DG, Nason KS (2016) A systematic review and meta-analysis of mesh vs suture cruroplasty in laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair. Am J Surg 211(1):226–238
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.07.007 pubmed: 26520872
Sánchez-Pernaute A, Pérez-Aguirre ME, Jiménez AP, Campos AR, Muñoz A, Torres A (2019) Intraluminal mesh erosion after prosthetic hiatoplasty: incidence management and outcomes. Dis Esophagus. https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doy131  (Epub ahead of print)
doi: 10.1093/dote/doy131 pubmed: 30791045
Zhang C, Liu D, Li F, Watson DI, Gao X, Koetje JH, Luo T, Yan C, Du X, Wang Z (2017) Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic mesh versus suture repair of hiatus hernia: objective and subjective outcomes. Surg Endosc 31(12):4913–4922
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5586-x pubmed: 28523363 pmcid: 5715047
Lidor AO, Kawaji Q, Stem M, Fleming RM, Schweitzer MA, Steele KE, Marohn MR (2013) Defining recurrence after paraesophageal hernia repair: correlating symptoms and radiographic findings. Surgery 154(2):171–178
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.03.015 pubmed: 23777587
Lal P, Tang A, Sarvepalli S, Raja S, Thota P, Lopez R, Murthy S, Ray M, Gabbard S (2020) Manometric esophageal length to height (MELH) ratio predicts hiatal hernia recurrence. J Clin Gastroenterol. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000001316 (Epub ahead of print)
doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001316 pubmed: 31985712
Endzinas Z, Jonciauskiene J, Mickevicius A, Kiudelis M (2007) Hiatal hernia recurrence after laparoscopic fundoplication. Medicina (Kaunas) 43(1):27–31
doi: 10.3390/medicina43010003
Granderath FA, Schweiger UM, Pointner R (2007) Laparoscopic antireflux surgery: tailoring the hiatal closure to the size of hiatal surface area. Surg Endosc 21(4):542–548 Epub 2006
doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9041-7 pubmed: 17103275
Grubnik VV, Malynovskyy AV (2013) Laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernias: new classification supported by long-term results. Surg Endosc 27(11):4337–4346
doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3069-2 pubmed: 23877759
Loukas M, Wartmann ChT, Tubbs RS, Apaydin N, Louis RG Jr, Gupta AA, Jordan R (2008) Morphologic variation of the diaphragmatic crura: a correlation with pathologic processes of the esophageal hiatus? Folia Morphol (Warsz) 67(4):273–279
Turner B, Helm M, Hetzel E, Schumm M, Gould JC (2019) The relationship between gastroesophageal junction integrity and symptomatic fundoplication outcomes. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06921-9
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06921-9 pubmed: 31286255
Huerta CT, Plymale M, Barrett P, Davenport DL, Roth JS (2019) Long-term efficacy of laparoscopic Nissen versus Toupet fundoplication for the management of types III and IV hiatal hernias. Surg Endosc 33(9):2895–2900
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6589-y pubmed: 30478698
Lidor AO, Steele KE, Stem M, Fleming RM, Schweitzer MA, Marohn MR (2015) Long-term quality of life and risk factors for recurrence after laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hernia. JAMA Surg 150(5):424–431
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.25 pubmed: 25785415
Broeders JA, Mauritz FA, Ahmed Ali U, Draaisma WA, Ruurda JP, Gooszen HG, Smout AJ, Broeders IA, Hazebroek EJ (2010) Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic Nissen (posterior total) versus Toupet (posterior partial) fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg 97:1318–1330
doi: 10.1002/bjs.7174 pubmed: 20641062
Hakanson BS, Lundell L, Bylund A, Thorell A (2019) Comparison of laparoscopic 270° posterior partial fundoplication vs. total fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Rand Clin Tr JAMA Surg 154(6):479–486
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0047

Auteurs

A Aiolfi (A)

Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, University of Milan, Istitituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy. alberto.aiolfi86@gmail.com.

M Cavalli (M)

Department of Surgery, University of Insubria, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Milano, Italy.

G Saino (G)

Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, University of Milan, Istitituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy.

A Sozzi (A)

Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, University of Milan, Istitituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy.

G Bonitta (G)

Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, University of Milan, Istitituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy.

G Micheletto (G)

Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation INCO and General Surgery, University of Milan, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Milan, Italy.

G Campanelli (G)

Department of Surgery, University of Insubria, Istituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Milano, Italy.

D Bona (D)

Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Division of General Surgery, University of Milan, Istitituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, Via Luigi Giuseppe Faravelli, 16, 20149, Milan, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH