Computed Tomography Evaluation of Normal Lacrimal Gland Dimensions in the Adult Pakistani Population.

computed tomography lacrimal gland

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 Mar 2020
Historique:
entrez: 28 4 2020
pubmed: 28 4 2020
medline: 28 4 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Objectives To estimate the normal dimensions of lacrimal glands (LGs) in the Pakistani population using computed tomography (CT) scan and to determine the associations of LG dimensions with age, sex, and laterality. Methods The study population included subjects aged ≥16 years without orbital pathology who underwent CT evaluation of both the right and left LGs at Dr. Ziauddin University Hospital from June 2018 to November 2019. The mean axial length (AL), axial width (AW), coronal length (CL), and coronal width (CW) of each LG were measured separately. Results The 108 subjects enrolled in this study included 75 (69.4%) men and 33 (30.6%) women, with a mean age of 49±20 years. Right and left LG dimensions were similar, including mean AL (13.53±1.80 mm vs. 13.35±1.72 mm), mean AW (4.20±0.81 mm vs. 4.05±0.93 mm), mean CL (15.46±1.97 mm vs. 15.26±1.87 mm), and mean CW (3.99±0.80 mm vs. 3.86±0.81 mm). The AL of both LGs and the CL and CW of right but not left LGs were significantly lower in women than in men. Age showed significant correlations with the AL and CL of both LGs. Conclusion These findings establish the normal range of LG dimensions in adult Pakistani populations. Some LG dimensions are smaller in women than in men, as well as correlating with age.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32337120
doi: 10.7759/cureus.7393
pmc: PMC7179983
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e7393

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020, Nawaz et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Feb;10(2):TC06-8
pubmed: 27042554
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Apr;184(4):1320-5
pubmed: 15788618
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jan-Feb;28(1):69-72
pubmed: 22262292
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Sep-Oct;30(5):388-91
pubmed: 24786180
Neuroradiology. 2018 Dec;60(12):1253-1266
pubmed: 30310941
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Nov-Dec;27(6):453-6
pubmed: 21659915
J Craniofac Surg. 2013 May;24(3):712-5
pubmed: 23715005
Radiology. 1983 Dec;149(3):751-8
pubmed: 6647851
Orbit. 2013 Jun;32(3):151-5
pubmed: 23480843
Open Ophthalmol J. 2009 Jun 11;3:26-8
pubmed: 19554218
Ocul Surf. 2007 Jan;5(1):13-22
pubmed: 17252162
Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2006 Dec;27(6):476-91
pubmed: 17233230

Auteurs

Shah Nawaz (S)

Radiology, Dr. Ziauddin Hospital Clifton Branch, Karachi, PAK.

Sajan Lal (S)

Radiology, Dr. Ziauddin Hospital, Karachi, PAK.

Riffat Butt (R)

Radiology, Dr. Ziauddin Hospital, Karachi, PAK.

Muhammad Ali (M)

Radiology, Dr. Ziauddin Hospital, Karachi, PAK.

Bhesham Shahani (B)

Radiology, Dr. Ziauddin Hospital, Karachi, PAK.

Arthina Dadlani (A)

Radiology, Dr. Ziauddin University and Hospital, Karachi, PAK.

Classifications MeSH