Outcome of cats referred to a specialized adoption program for feline leukemia virus-positive cats.
Feline leukemia virus
animal shelter
animal shelter outcomes
feline welfare
pet adoption
shelter medicine
Journal
Journal of feline medicine and surgery
ISSN: 1532-2750
Titre abrégé: J Feline Med Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100897329
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2020
12 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
28
4
2020
medline:
17
4
2021
entrez:
28
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess outcomes of cats referred to a specialized adoption program for feline leukemia virus (FeLV)-positive cats. Cats referred to an FeLV-specific adoption program between January 2018 and July 2019 at an animal shelter in Austin, TX, USA, were first identified based on their putative FeLV status as reported by the referring shelter, rescue group, veterinarian or individual. Each cat was re-screened for FeLV upon admission and subsequently deemed infected or uninfected. Data on cat source, admission date, outcome date, outcome type, signalment and comorbidities at the time of admission were extracted from the shelter database. Outcomes were recorded up to 15 December 2019. In total, 801 cats suspected to be infected with FeLV were referred to the FeLV adoption program. Of these, 149 (18.6%) were ultimately deemed uninfected, and infection was confirmed in 652 (81.4%) cats. Adoption was the most common outcome for FeLV-infected cats (n = 514 cats; 78.8%), followed by euthanasia or death in care (n = 109; 16.7%). Upper respiratory infection (URI) was the most common comorbidity in FeLV-infected cats (n = 106; 16.3%) at the time of admission, which was not significantly different than URI in the cats that were deemed not to be infected with FeLV (n = 29; 19.5%). This study demonstrated high national demand for a lifesaving option for cats diagnosed with FeLV. FeLV infections could not be confirmed in approximately one in five cats referred to the FeLV adoption program, a reminder of the risk behind basing the fate of a cat on a single positive test result. The majority of cats referred to the FeLV program were adopted, demonstrating that programs centered on adopter education and post-adoption support can create lifesaving outcomes for most FeLV-infected cats, despite uncertainty regarding their long-term prognosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32338565
doi: 10.1177/1098612X20913359
pmc: PMC7691564
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1160-1167Références
JFMS Open Rep. 2016 Oct 05;2(2):2055116916667757
pubmed: 28491433
Retrovirology. 2015 Dec 21;12:105
pubmed: 26689419
J Feline Med Surg. 2004 Apr;6(2):83-8
pubmed: 15123152
Virus Res. 2015 Feb 2;197:137-50
pubmed: 25553598
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2017 Jul 15;251(2):187-194
pubmed: 28671491
J Vet Intern Med. 2017 Mar;31(2):521-526
pubmed: 28158913
Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Dec;67:101348
pubmed: 31527012
J Feline Med Surg. 2020 Jan;22(1):5-30
pubmed: 31916872
Prev Vet Med. 2018 Feb 1;150:38-46
pubmed: 29406082
Viruses. 2019 May 31;11(6):
pubmed: 31159230
J Feline Med Surg. 2013 Sep;15(9):785-808
pubmed: 23966005
J Virol. 2018 Aug 29;92(18):
pubmed: 29976676
JFMS Open Rep. 2017 Sep 19;3(2):2055116917729311
pubmed: 30202540