Effectiveness of a Home-Based Rehabilitation Program After Total Hip Arthroplasty Driven by a Tablet App and Remote Coaching: Nonrandomized Controlled Trial Combining a Single-Arm Intervention Cohort With Historical Controls.

home-based rehabilitation program internet osteoarthritis physiotherapy rehabilitation remote coaching tablet app total hip arthroplasty total hip replacement usual care

Journal

JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies
ISSN: 2369-2529
Titre abrégé: JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101703412

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Apr 2020
Historique:
received: 26 03 2019
accepted: 24 01 2020
revised: 20 12 2019
entrez: 28 4 2020
pubmed: 28 4 2020
medline: 28 4 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Recent technological developments such as wearable sensors and tablets with a mobile internet connection hold promise for providing electronic health home-based programs with remote coaching for patients following total hip arthroplasty. It can be hypothesized that such a home-based rehabilitation program can offer an effective alternative to usual care. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a home-based rehabilitation program driven by a tablet app and remote coaching for patients following total hip arthroplasty. Existing data of two studies were combined, in which patients of a single-arm intervention study were matched with historical controls of an observational study. Patients aged 18-65 years who had undergone total hip arthroplasty as a treatment for primary or secondary osteoarthritis were included. The intervention consisted of a 12-week home-based rehabilitation program with video instructions on a tablet and remote coaching (intervention group). Patients were asked to do strengthening and walking exercises at least 5 days a week. Data of the intervention group were compared with those of patients who received usual care (control group). Effectiveness was measured at four moments (preoperatively, and 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months postoperatively) by means of functional tests (Timed Up & Go test and the Five Times Sit-to Stand Test) and self-reported questionnaires (Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [HOOS] and Short Form 36 [SF-36]). Each patient of the intervention group was matched with two patients of the control group. Patient characteristics were summarized with descriptive statistics. The 1:2 matching situation was analyzed with a conditional logistic regression. Effect sizes were calculated by Cohen d. Overall, 15 patients of the intervention group were included in this study, and 15 and 12 subjects from the control group were matched to the intervention group, respectively. The intervention group performed functional tests significantly faster at 12 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. The intervention group also scored significantly higher on the subscales "function in sport and recreational activities" and "hip-related quality of life" of HOOS, and on the subscale "physical role limitations" of SF-36 at 12 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. Large effect sizes were found on functional tests at 12 weeks and at 6 months (Cohen d=0.5-1.2), endorsed by effect sizes on the self-reported outcomes. Our results clearly demonstrate larger effects in the intervention group compared to the historical controls. These results imply that a home-based rehabilitation program delivered by means of internet technology after total hip arthroplasty can be more effective than usual care. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03846063; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03846063 and German Registry of Clinical Trials DRKS00011345; https://tinyurl.com/yd32gmdo.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Recent technological developments such as wearable sensors and tablets with a mobile internet connection hold promise for providing electronic health home-based programs with remote coaching for patients following total hip arthroplasty. It can be hypothesized that such a home-based rehabilitation program can offer an effective alternative to usual care.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a home-based rehabilitation program driven by a tablet app and remote coaching for patients following total hip arthroplasty.
METHODS METHODS
Existing data of two studies were combined, in which patients of a single-arm intervention study were matched with historical controls of an observational study. Patients aged 18-65 years who had undergone total hip arthroplasty as a treatment for primary or secondary osteoarthritis were included. The intervention consisted of a 12-week home-based rehabilitation program with video instructions on a tablet and remote coaching (intervention group). Patients were asked to do strengthening and walking exercises at least 5 days a week. Data of the intervention group were compared with those of patients who received usual care (control group). Effectiveness was measured at four moments (preoperatively, and 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months postoperatively) by means of functional tests (Timed Up & Go test and the Five Times Sit-to Stand Test) and self-reported questionnaires (Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [HOOS] and Short Form 36 [SF-36]). Each patient of the intervention group was matched with two patients of the control group. Patient characteristics were summarized with descriptive statistics. The 1:2 matching situation was analyzed with a conditional logistic regression. Effect sizes were calculated by Cohen d.
RESULTS RESULTS
Overall, 15 patients of the intervention group were included in this study, and 15 and 12 subjects from the control group were matched to the intervention group, respectively. The intervention group performed functional tests significantly faster at 12 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. The intervention group also scored significantly higher on the subscales "function in sport and recreational activities" and "hip-related quality of life" of HOOS, and on the subscale "physical role limitations" of SF-36 at 12 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. Large effect sizes were found on functional tests at 12 weeks and at 6 months (Cohen d=0.5-1.2), endorsed by effect sizes on the self-reported outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our results clearly demonstrate larger effects in the intervention group compared to the historical controls. These results imply that a home-based rehabilitation program delivered by means of internet technology after total hip arthroplasty can be more effective than usual care.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03846063; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03846063 and German Registry of Clinical Trials DRKS00011345; https://tinyurl.com/yd32gmdo.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32338621
pii: v7i1e14139
doi: 10.2196/14139
pmc: PMC7215512
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03846063']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e14139

Informations de copyright

©Annet Wijnen, Jildou Hoogland, Tjerk Munsterman, Carina LE Gerritsma, Baukje Dijkstra, Wierd P Zijlstra, Johan S Dekker, Janneke Annegarn, Francisco Ibarra, Geranda EC Slager, Wiebren Zijlstra, Martin Stevens. Originally published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology (http://rehab.jmir.org), 27.04.2020.

Références

Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 Jan;17(1):132
pubmed: 18620874
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Apr 19;99(8):648-655
pubmed: 28419032
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8
pubmed: 1991946
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 12;15(8):e159
pubmed: 23939401
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1055-68
pubmed: 9817123
J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14(5):257-60
pubmed: 18633001
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Aug;89(8):1442-7
pubmed: 18586222
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 31;7(1):e10342
pubmed: 30702438
J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17(1):1-6
pubmed: 21097560
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Dec;85(12):1943-51
pubmed: 15605331
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jul;93(7):1292-4
pubmed: 22494947
J Strength Cond Res. 2005 Aug;19(3):717-20
pubmed: 16095431
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Apr;91(1):14-24
pubmed: 23194823
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 11;7(8):e016020
pubmed: 28801413
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2001 Oct;11(5):280-6
pubmed: 11696212
J Physiother. 2013 Dec;59(4):219-26
pubmed: 24287215

Auteurs

Annet Wijnen (A)

Department of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Jildou Hoogland (J)

Department of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Tjerk Munsterman (T)

Department of Physiotherapy, Martini Hospital Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Carina LE Gerritsma (CL)

Department of Orthopedics, Martini Hospital Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Baukje Dijkstra (B)

Department of Orthopedics, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands.

Wierd P Zijlstra (WP)

Department of Orthopedics, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands.

Johan S Dekker (JS)

Department of Orthopedics, Ommelander Ziekenhuis Groep, Scheemda, Netherlands.

Janneke Annegarn (J)

Collaborative Care Solutions, Philips Research, Eindhoven, Netherlands.

Francisco Ibarra (F)

University of Trento, Trento, Italy.

Geranda Ec Slager (GE)

Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Care Studies, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, Netherlands.

Wiebren Zijlstra (W)

Institute of Movement and Sport Gerontology, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Martin Stevens (M)

Department of Orthopedics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH