Effectiveness of implementation strategies for venous leg ulcer guidelines: A systematic review.


Journal

Journal of tissue viability
ISSN: 0965-206X
Titre abrégé: J Tissue Viability
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9306822

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Historique:
received: 22 12 2019
revised: 23 02 2020
accepted: 12 03 2020
pubmed: 29 4 2020
medline: 15 4 2021
entrez: 29 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The aim of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is to improve patient care; however inconsistencies between recommended practice and what actually happens in clinical practice continues. Venous Leg Ulcers (VLUs) have a significant negative impact on patients' quality of life and it is acknowledged that managing people with venous leg ulcers is protracted and costly. The aim of this review is to identify the most effective strategies to implement clinical practice guidelines for the management of VLUs by health care professionals in the hospital, outpatient, home and community setting. A systematic review guided by methods from the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group was undertaken to identify implementation strategies for VLU clinical practice guidelines. Eligible studies were identified via systematic electronic searches of Medline, Embase, CINHAL and the Cochrane Library. We identified 142 potential studies of which one randomised controlled trial met the inclusion criteria. Following an analysis of the included study, it is not possible to recommend one implementation strategy over another when implementing practice guidelines for people with VLUs. We identified a limited evidence base for the effectiveness of implementation strategies for VLU CPGs. No one implementation strategy is better than another to facilitate VLU CPG implementation by health care professionals in hospital, outpatient, home or community settings.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The aim of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is to improve patient care; however inconsistencies between recommended practice and what actually happens in clinical practice continues. Venous Leg Ulcers (VLUs) have a significant negative impact on patients' quality of life and it is acknowledged that managing people with venous leg ulcers is protracted and costly. The aim of this review is to identify the most effective strategies to implement clinical practice guidelines for the management of VLUs by health care professionals in the hospital, outpatient, home and community setting.
METHODS METHODS
A systematic review guided by methods from the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) group was undertaken to identify implementation strategies for VLU clinical practice guidelines. Eligible studies were identified via systematic electronic searches of Medline, Embase, CINHAL and the Cochrane Library.
RESULTS RESULTS
We identified 142 potential studies of which one randomised controlled trial met the inclusion criteria. Following an analysis of the included study, it is not possible to recommend one implementation strategy over another when implementing practice guidelines for people with VLUs.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
We identified a limited evidence base for the effectiveness of implementation strategies for VLU CPGs. No one implementation strategy is better than another to facilitate VLU CPG implementation by health care professionals in hospital, outpatient, home or community settings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32340716
pii: S0965-206X(19)30180-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2020.03.002
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

161-168

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 Tissue Viability Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest None.

Auteurs

Justin Kerr (J)

Department of Nursing, Health Sciences and Social Care, Galway Mayo Institute of Technology, Mayo Campus, Westport Road, Castlebar, Co. Mayo, F23 X853, Ireland. Electronic address: Justin.kerr@gmit.ie.

Declan Devane (D)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, University Road, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland; Evidence Synthesis Ireland, National University of Ireland, Galway, University Road, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland. Electronic address: Declan.devane@nuigalway.ie.

John Ivory (J)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, University Road, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland; Alliance for Research and Innovation in Wounds, National University of Ireland, Galway, University Road, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland. Electronic address: john.ivory@nuigalway.ie.

Carolina Weller (C)

Wound Research Group, Monash University, Nursing and Midwifery, Level 5, Alfred Centre 99 Commercial Road, 3004, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: Carolina.Weller@monash.edu.

Georgina Gethin (G)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, University Road, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland; Alliance for Research and Innovation in Wounds, National University of Ireland, Galway, University Road, Galway, H91 TK33, Ireland. Electronic address: Georgina.Gethin@nuigalway.ie.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH