Validation and defining the minimal clinically important difference of the Japanese version of the IKDC Subjective Knee Form.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries / diagnosis Humans Japan Minimal Clinically Important Difference Prospective Studies Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires Translations

Journal

Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association
ISSN: 1436-2023
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Sci
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 9604934

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Historique:
received: 05 12 2019
revised: 03 02 2020
accepted: 07 02 2020
pubmed: 29 4 2020
medline: 30 9 2021
entrez: 29 4 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study aimed to validate and determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the Japanese version of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (Japanese IKDC-SKF) for patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. This prospective study was performed using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline to assess the measurement properties of reliability, responsiveness, validity, and interpretability of the Japanese IKDC-SKF. A total of 152 patients were enrolled in the study. The Japanese IKDC-SKF had excellent internal consistency [Cronbach's alpha (95% confidence interval, CI) was 0.90 (0.88-0.92), and the test-retest reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC Our results indicate that the Japanese version of the IKDC-SKF is a reliable, valid, and responsive measurement instrument with which to evaluate the physical function of patients with ACL injuries.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
This study aimed to validate and determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the Japanese version of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (Japanese IKDC-SKF) for patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries.
METHODS METHODS
This prospective study was performed using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guideline to assess the measurement properties of reliability, responsiveness, validity, and interpretability of the Japanese IKDC-SKF.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 152 patients were enrolled in the study. The Japanese IKDC-SKF had excellent internal consistency [Cronbach's alpha (95% confidence interval, CI) was 0.90 (0.88-0.92), and the test-retest reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our results indicate that the Japanese version of the IKDC-SKF is a reliable, valid, and responsive measurement instrument with which to evaluate the physical function of patients with ACL injuries.

Identifiants

DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.02.010 PMID: 32340786
pubmed: 32340786
pii: S0949-2658(20)30061-0
doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.02.010
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

149-155

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest None.

Auteurs

Hui Huang (H)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Masashi Nagao (M)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Medical Technology Innovation Center, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan; Clinical Research and Trial Center, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan; Graduate School of Health and Sports Science, Juntendo University, Chiba, Japan. Electronic address: nagao@juntendo.ac.jp.

Hitoshi Arita (H)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Hirofumi Nishio (H)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Graduate School of Health and Sports Science, Juntendo University, Chiba, Japan.

Haruka Kaneko (H)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Yoshitomo Saita (Y)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Muneaki Ishijima (M)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Yuji Takazawa (Y)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Graduate School of Health and Sports Science, Juntendo University, Chiba, Japan.

Hiroshi Ikeda (H)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Kazuo Kaneko (K)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female

Evaluation of Low-Value Services Across Major Medicare Advantage Insurers and Traditional Medicare.

Ciara Duggan, Adam L Beckman, Ishani Ganguli et al.
1.00
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C

Effectiveness of Virtual Yoga for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Hallie Tankha, Devyn Gaskins, Amanda Shallcross et al.
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH

questionsmedicales.fr › Plaies et blessures › Traumatismes de la jambe › Traumatismes du genou › Lésions du ligament croisé antérieur › Validation and defining the minimal clinically...
questionsmedicales.fr › Eucaryotes › Animaux › Chordés › Vertébrés › Mammifères › Eutheria › Primates › Haplorhini › Catarrhini › Hominidae › Humains › Validation and defining the minimal clinically...
questionsmedicales.fr › Régions géographiques › Iles › Japon › Validation and defining the minimal clinically...
questionsmedicales.fr › Qualité, accès, évaluation des soins de santé › Qualité des soins de santé › Mécanismes d'évaluation des soins de santé › Évaluation des résultats et des processus en soins de santé › Évaluation de résultat (soins) › Évaluation des résultats des patients › Pertinence clinique › Différence minimale cliniquement importante › Validation and defining the minimal clinically...
questionsmedicales.fr › Environnement et santé publique › Santé publique › Méthodes épidémiologiques › Caractéristiques des études épidémiologiques › Études épidémiologiques › Études de cohortes › Études prospectives › Validation and defining the minimal clinically...
questionsmedicales.fr › Environnement et santé publique › Santé publique › Méthodes épidémiologiques › Méthodologie en recherche épidémiologique › Reproductibilité des résultats › Validation and defining the minimal clinically...
questionsmedicales.fr › Environnement et santé publique › Santé publique › Méthodes épidémiologiques › Collecte de données › Enquêtes et questionnaires › Validation and defining the minimal clinically...
questionsmedicales.fr › Sciences de l'information › Sources d'information › Moyens de communication › Publications › Traductions › Validation and defining the minimal clinically...