Magnitude and Reliability of Velocity and Power Variables During Deadlifts Performed With and Without Lifting Straps.
Journal
Journal of strength and conditioning research
ISSN: 1533-4287
Titre abrégé: J Strength Cond Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9415084
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 May 2022
01 May 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
29
4
2020
medline:
3
5
2022
entrez:
29
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Jukic, I, García-Ramos, A, Malecek, J, Omcirk, D, and Tufano, JJ. Magnitude and reliability of velocity and power variables during deadlifts performed with and without lifting straps. J Strength Cond Res 36(5): 1177-1184, 2022-This study aimed to compare the magnitude and reliability of mean velocity (MV), peak velocity (PV), mean power (MP), and peak power (PP) between deadlifts performed with (DLw) and without (DLn) lifting straps. Sixteen resistance-trained men performed a DLn 1-repetition maximum (1RM) session followed by 4 experimental sessions (2 with each deadlift variant in a randomized order). Each experimental session comprised lifts at 20, 40, 60, and 80% of the DLn 1RM. No significant differences were found between DLw and DLn for MV, MP, PV, and PP at any load (p = 0.309-1.00; g = 0.00-0.19). All mechanical variables showed an acceptable reliability for both deadlift conditions at each relative load (coefficient of variation [CV] <8%; intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > 0.70; g < 0.5) with the only exception of MV at 60% 1RM for DLw (ICC = 0.62) and at 40% 1RM for DLn (ICC = 0.65). Furthermore, MV and PV generally had lower within-subject CV (CV = 3.56-5.86%) than MP and PP (CV = 3.82-8.05%) during both deadlift conditions. Our findings suggest that sport professionals might not need to consider implementing lifting straps with the aim to maximize velocity and power outputs with submaximal loads in a deadlift exercise. Because all mechanical variables measured showed an acceptable level of reliability for both DLw and DLn, they can all be used to track changes in performance during the deadlift exercise. However, velocity variables were slightly more consistent (lower CV), which makes them more appropriate to track DLw and DLn performance changes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32341244
pii: 00124278-202205000-00002
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003608
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1177-1184Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 National Strength and Conditioning Association.
Références
Banyard HG, Nosaka K, Haff GG. Reliability and validity of the load–velocity relationship to predict the 1RM back squat. J Strength Cond Res 31: 1897–1904, 2017.
Banyard HG, Nosaka K, Sato K, Haff GG. Validity of various methods for determining velocity, force, and power in the back squat. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 12: 1170–1176, 2017.
Banyard HG, Nosaka K, Vernon AD, Haff GG. The reliability of individualized load–velocity profiles. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 13: 763–769, 2018.
Brandmaier AM, Wenger E, Bodammer NC, et al. Assessing reliability in neuroimaging research through intra-class effect decomposition (ICED). Elife 7: e35718, 2018.
Cohen J. The concepts of power analysis. Stat Power Analysis Behav Sciences 2: 1–17, 1988.
Conceição F, Fernandes J, Lewis M, Gonzaléz-Badillo JJ, Jimenéz-Reyes P. Movement velocity as a measure of exercise intensity in three lower limb exercises. J Sports Sci 34: 1099–1106, 2016.
Cormie P, McGuigan MR, Newton RU. Adaptations in athletic performance after ballistic power versus strength training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 42: 1582–1598, 2010.
Coswig VS, Freitas DFM, Gentil P, Fukuda DH, Del Vecchio FB. Kinematics and kinetics of multiple sets using lifting straps during deadlift training. J Strength Cond Res 29: 3399–3404, 2015.
García-Ramos A, Haff GG, Padial P, Feriche B. Reliability of power and velocity variables collected during the traditional and ballistic bench press exercise. Sports Biomech 17: 117–130, 2018.
García-Ramos A, Jaric S, Pérez-Castilla A, Padial P, Feriche B. Reliability and magnitude of mechanical variables assessed from unconstrained and constrained loaded countermovement jumps. Sports Biomech 16: 514–526, 2017.
García-Ramos A, Pestaña-Melero FL, Pérez-Castilla A, Rojas FJ, Haff GG. Differences in the load-velocity profile between four bench press variants. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 13: 326–331, 2017.
García-Ramos A, Suzovic D, Pérez-Castilla A. The load-velocity profiles of three upper-body pushing exercises in men and women. Sports Biomech 1–13, 2019.
González-Badillo JJ, Sánchez-Medina L. Movement velocity as a measure of loading intensity in resistance training. Int J Sports Med 31: 347–352, 2010.
González-Badillo JJ, Yañez-García JM, Mora-Custodio R, Rodríguez-Rosell D. Velocity loss as a variable for monitoring resistance exercise. Int J Sports Med 38: 217–225, 2017.
Haff GG, Nimphius S. Training principles for power. Strength Cond J 34: 2–12, 2012.
Harris NK, Cronin J, Taylor KL, Boris J, Sheppard J. Understanding position transducer technology for strength and conditioning practitioners. Strength Cond J 32: 66–79, 2010.
Hopkins WG. Spreadsheets for analysis of validity and reliability. Sportscience 21: 36–44, 2017.
James LP, Gregory Haff GG, Kelly VG, et al. The impact of strength level on adaptations to combined weightlifting, plyometric, and ballistic training. Scand J Med Sci Sports 28: 1494–1505, 2018.
Jidovtseff B, Harris NK, Crielaard JM, Cronin JB. Using the load-velocity relationship for 1RM prediction. J Strength Cond Res 25: 267–270, 2011.
Kompf J, Arandjelović O. The sticking point in the bench press, the squat, and the deadlift: Similarities and differences, and their significance for research and practice. Sports Med 47: 631–640, 2017.
McMaster DT, Gill N, Cronin J, McGuigan M. A brief review of strength and ballistic assessment methodologies in sport. Sports Med 44: 603–623, 2014.
Morán-Navarro R, Martínez-Cava A, Sánchez-Medina L, et al. Movement velocity as a measure of level of effort during resistance exercise. J Strength Cond Res 33: 1496–1504, 2019.
Morán-Navarro R, Pérez CE, Mora-Rodríguez R, et al. Time course of recovery following resistance training leading or not to failure. Eur J Appl Physiol 117: 2387–2399, 2017.
Orange ST, Metcalfe JW, Marshall P, et al. Test-retest reliability of a commercial linear position transducer (GymAware PowerTool) to measure velocity and power in the back squat and bench press. J Strength Cond Res 34: 728–737, 2018.
Qaisar SM, Fesquet L, Renaudin M. Adaptive rate sampling and filtering based on level crossing sampling. EURASIP J Adv Sig Pr 2009: 971656, 2009.
Ruf L, Chéry C, Taylor KL. Validity and reliability of the load-velocity relationship to predict the one-repetition maximum in deadlift. J Strength Cond Res 32: 681–689, 2018.
Sanchez-Medina L, González-Badillo JJ. Velocity loss as an indicator of neuromuscular fatigue during resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 43: 1725–1734, 2011.
Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 19: 231–240, 2005.
Winter EM, Abt G, Brookes FC, et al. Misuse of power and other mechanical terms in sport and exercise science research. J Strength Cond Res 30: 292–300, 2016.