Evaluation of the "Minimal Clinically Important Difference" (MCID) of the KOOS, KSS and SF-12 scores after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy.
Adult
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Female
Humans
Knee Injuries
/ surgery
Knee Joint
/ surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Minimal Clinically Important Difference
Osteoarthritis, Knee
/ surgery
Osteotomy
/ methods
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Postoperative Period
Prospective Studies
ROC Curve
Tibia
/ surgery
KOOS
KSS
MCID
Open wedge osteotomy
SF-12
Journal
Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA
ISSN: 1433-7347
Titre abrégé: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9314730
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Mar 2021
Historique:
received:
10
02
2020
accepted:
21
04
2020
pubmed:
29
4
2020
medline:
5
5
2021
entrez:
29
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Defining a Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) value for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) is crucial for determining the effectiveness of a procedure and calculating the sample size for trial planning. The purpose of this study was to determine the MCID of several PROMs (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Society Score (KSS) and the SF-12) in patients who underwent medial opening-wedge High-Tibial Osteotomy (owHTO) with Patient-Specific Cutting Guides (PSCGs), using anchor-based methods. Patients undergoing isolated medial owHTO with PSCGs between January 2013 and January 2017 were enrolled in this single-center, prospective, observational study. Three outcome scores were collected pre-operatively and at the 2 years follow-up evaluation: KOOS, KSS and SF-12. The MCIDs were calculated using anchor-based method: at 2 years postoperatively: "Compared with before surgery, how would you rate operated joint now?" The responses were recorded using a five-point scale. Patients who answered "about the same" or "somewhat worse" were classified into the no change group, while those who answered "somewhat better" were classified into the minimal change group. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to define the cutoff point that best discriminated between the minimal change and no change groups for each PROMs RESULTS: 196 patients were included, 75 (somewhat better) and 24 patients (about the same and somewhat worse) were, respectively, assigned to the "no change" and "minimal change" groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of baseline characteristics and postoperative complications. At 24 months follow-up all the PROMs (KOOS, KSS and SF-12) were significantly better for the "minimal change" group compared to the "no change" group. MCID was 15.4 for KOOS pain, 15.1 for KOOS symptoms, 17 for KOOS ADL, 11.2 for KOOS sports/recreation, 16.5 for KOOS QQL, 3 for KSS symptoms, 5.6 for KSS activity, 7.2 for SF-12 physical component and 6.3 for PCS mental component. This study determined the MCIDs of common used PROMs in patients undergoing owHTO. Prospective Cohort Study, Level II.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32342141
doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06026-0
pii: 10.1007/s00167-020-06026-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
820-826Références
Ahlbäck S, Rydberg J (1980) X-ray classification and examination technics in gonarthrosis. Lakartidningen 77(2091–2093):2096
Brouwer RW, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, van Raaij TM, Verhaar JAN (2006) Osteotomy for medial compartment arthritis of the knee using a closing wedge or an opening wedge controlled by a Puddu plate. A one-year randomised, controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:1454–1459
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B11.17743
Chaouche S, Jacquet C, Fabre-Aubrespy M, Sharma A, Argenson J-N, Parratte S, Ollivier M (2019) Patient-specific cutting guides for open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: safety and accuracy analysis of a hundred patients continuous cohort. Int Orthop 43:2757–2765
doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04372-4
Cho W-J, Kim J-M, Kim W-K, Kim D-E, Kim N-K, Bin S-I (2018) Mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in old-aged patients demonstrates superior short-term clinical outcomes to open-wedge high tibial osteotomy in middle-aged patients with advanced isolated medial osteoarthritis. Int Orthop 42:2357–2363
doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3880-4
Collins NJ, Prinsen CAC, Christensen R, Bartels EM, Terwee CB, Roos EM (2016) Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties. Osteoarthr Cartil 24:1317–1329
doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.03.010
Copay AG, Subach BR, Glassman SD, Polly DW, Schuler TC (2007) Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. Spine J 7:541–546
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.01.008
Darees M, Putman S, Brosset T, Roumazeille T, Pasquier G, Migaud H (2018) Opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy performed with locking plate fixation (TomoFix) and early weight-bearing but without filling the defect. A concise follow-up note of 48 cases at 10 years’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 104:477–480
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.12.021
Duivenvoorden T, Brouwer RW, Baan A, Bos PK, Reijman M, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Verhaar JAN, (2014) Comparison of closing-wedge and opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled trial with a six-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:1425–1432
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00786
Elson DW, Petheram TG, Dawson MJ (2015) High reliability in digital planning of medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy, using Miniaci’s method. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:2041–2048
doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-2920-x
Gulagaci F, Jacquet C, Ehlinger M, Sharma A, Kley K, Wilson A, Parratte S, Ollivier M (2019) A protective hinge wire, intersecting the osteotomy plane, can reduce the occurrence of perioperative hinge fractures in medial opening wedge osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05806-7
doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05806-7
pubmed: 31773202
Han JH, Yang J-H, Bhandare NN, Suh DW, Lee JS, Chang YS, Yeom JW, Nha KW (2016) Total knee arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review of open versus closed wedge osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:2567–2577
doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3807-1
Hantes ME, Natsaridis P, Koutalos AA, Ono Y, Doxariotis N, Malizos KN (2017) Satisfactory functional and radiological outcomes can be expected in young patients under 45 years old after open wedge high tibial osteotomy in a long-term follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:3199–3205
doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4816-z
Hermann W, Lambova S, Muller-Ladner U (2018) Current treatment options for osteoarthritis. Curr Rheumatol Rev 14:108–116
doi: 10.2174/1573397113666170829155149
Jacquet C, Sharma A, Fabre M, Ehlinger M, Argenson J-N, Parratte S, Ollivier M (2019) Patient-specific high-tibial osteotomy’s “cutting-guides” decrease operating time and the number of fluoroscopic images taken after a Brief Learning Curve. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05637-6
doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05637-6
pubmed: 31773202
Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH (1989) Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 10:407–415
doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6
Jin C, Song E-K, Santoso A, Ingale PS, Choi I-S, Seon J-K (2019) Survival and risk factor analysis of medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy for unicompartment knee osteoarthritis. J Arthrosc Relat Surg 36:535–543
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.08.040
Katz NP, Paillard FC, Ekman E (2015) Determining the clinical importance of treatment benefits for interventions for painful orthopedic conditions. J Orthop Surg 10:24
doi: 10.1186/s13018-014-0144-x
Lind-Hansen TB, Lind MC, Nielsen PT, Laursen MB (2016) Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: RCT 2 years RSA follow-up. J Knee Surg 29:664–672
doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1571802
Lizaur-Utrilla A, Gonzalez-Parreño S, Martinez-Mendez D, Miralles-Muñoz FA, Lopez-Prats FA (2019) Minimal clinically important differences and substantial clinical benefits for Knee Society Scores. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05543-x
doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05543-x
pubmed: 31115608
Lu J, Tang S, Wang Y, Li Y, Liu C, Niu Y, Cao P, Wang F (2019) Clinical outcomes of closing- and opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy for treatment of anteromedial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. J Knee Surg 32:758–763
doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1668124
Maltenfort M, Díaz-Ledezma C (2017) statistics in brief: minimum clinically important difference-availability of reliable estimates. Clin Orthop 475:933–946
doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5204-6
Noble PC, Scuderi GR, Brekke AC, Sikorskii A, Benjamin JB, Lonner JH, Chadha P, Daylamani DA, Scott WN, Bourne RB (2012) Development of a new Knee Society scoring system. Clin Orthop 470:20–32
doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2152-z
Ogura T, Ackermann J, Mestriner AB, Merkely G, Gomoll AH (2018) The minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit in the patient-reported outcome measures of patients undergoing osteochondral allograft transplantation in the knee. Cartilage 19:47603518812552
Pannell WC, Heidari KS, Mayer EN, Zimmerman K, Heckmann N, McKnight B, Hill JR, Vangsness CT, Hatch GF, Weber AE (2019) High tibial osteotomy survivorship: a population-based study. Orthop J Sports Med 7:2325967119890693
doi: 10.1177/2325967119890693
Revicki D, Hays RD, Cella D, Sloan J (2008) Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 61:102–109
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012
Roos EM, Lohmander LS (2003) The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:64
doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-64
Saragaglia D, Roberts J (2005) Navigated osteotomies around the knee in 170 patients with osteoarthritis secondary to genu varum. Orthopedics 28:s1269–1274
pubmed: 16235453
Scuderi GR, Bourne RB, Noble PC, Benjamin JB, Lonner JH, Scott WN (2012) The new knee society knee scoring system. Clin Orthop 470:3–19
doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2135-0
Seo S-S, Kim O-G, Seo J-H, Kim D-H, Kim Y-G, Lee I-S (2016) Complications and short-term outcomes of medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy using a locking plate for medial osteoarthritis of the knee. Knee Surg Relat Res 28:289–296
doi: 10.5792/ksrr.16.028
Takeuchi R, Ishikawa H, Kumagai K, Yamaguchi Y, Chiba N, Akamatsu Y, Saito T (2012) Fractures around the lateral cortical hinge after a medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a new classification of lateral hinge fracture. J Arthrosc Relat Surg 28:85–94
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.06.034
Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34:220–233
doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003
Webster KE, Feller JA (2016) Comparison of the short form-12 (SF-12) health status questionnaire with the SF-36 in patients with knee osteoarthritis who have replacement surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:2620–2626
doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3904-1