Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of High Grade Cancer in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study.
magnetic resonance imaging
prostatic neoplasms
Journal
The Journal of urology
ISSN: 1527-3792
Titre abrégé: J Urol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376374
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
29
4
2020
medline:
30
10
2020
entrez:
29
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We investigated the ability of prostate magnetic resonance imaging to detect Gleason Grade Group 2 or greater cancer in a standardized, multi-institutional active surveillance cohort. We evaluated men enrolled in Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study with Gleason Grade Group less than 2 and who underwent biopsy within 12 months of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Our primary outcome was biopsy reclassification to Gleason Grade Group 2 or greater. We evaluated the performance of magnetic resonance imaging PI-RADS® score and clinical factors. Multivariable logistic regression models were fit with magnetic resonance imaging and clinical factors and used to perform receiver operating curve analyses. There were 361 participants with 395 prostate magnetic resonance imaging studies with a median followup of 4.1 (IQR 2.0-7.6) years. Overall 108 (27%) biopsies showed reclassification. Defining positive magnetic resonance imaging as PI-RADS 3-5, the negative predictive value and positive predictive value for detecting Gleason Grade Group 2 or greater cancer was 83% (95% CI 76-90) and 31% (95% CI 26-37), respectively. PI-RADS was significantly associated with reclassification (PI-RADS 5 vs 1 and 2 OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.21-6.17, p=0.016) in a multivariable model but did not improve upon a model with only clinical factors (AUC 0.768 vs 0.762). In 194 fusion biopsies higher grade cancer was found in targeted cores in 21 (11%) instances, while 25 (13%) had higher grade cancer in the systematic cores. This study adds the largest cohort data to the body of literature for magnetic resonance imaging in active surveillance, recommending systematic biopsy in patients with negative magnetic resonance imaging and the inclusion of systematic biopsy in patients with positive magnetic resonance imaging.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32343189
doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001088
pmc: PMC7483329
mid: NIHMS1592149
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
701-706Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA113913
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : U01 CA224255
Pays : United States
Références
Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822
pubmed: 28110982
Eur Urol. 2017 Feb;71(2):174-180
pubmed: 27236496
J Urol. 2014 Aug;192(2):385-90
pubmed: 24512956
Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):275-281
pubmed: 27595378
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-1424
pubmed: 27626136
Eur Urol. 2017 Sep;72(3):448-454
pubmed: 27889277
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 May 1;17(5):479-505
pubmed: 31085757
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 May;41(5):946-53
pubmed: 26910114
J Urol. 2012 Nov;188(5):1732-8
pubmed: 23017866
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Feb;45(2):579-585
pubmed: 27391860
J Urol. 2017 Mar;197(3 Pt 1):632-639
pubmed: 27639713
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun 20;34(18):2182-90
pubmed: 26884580
J Urol. 2020 Apr;203(4):706-712
pubmed: 31642740
BJU Int. 2019 Jul;124(1):47-54
pubmed: 30742733
Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):250-266
pubmed: 28336078
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Mar 27;:1-8
pubmed: 30917023
Eur Urol. 2019 Feb;75(2):300-309
pubmed: 30017404
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Jul;5(4):592-599
pubmed: 29226826
Urology. 2010 Feb;75(2):407-13
pubmed: 19758683
J Urol. 2016 Feb;195(2):313-20
pubmed: 26327354
Eur Urol. 2013 Dec;64(6):876-92
pubmed: 23787356
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Nov 10;36(32):3251-3258
pubmed: 30183466
J Urol. 2011 Aug;186(2):465-9
pubmed: 21679996
J Urol. 2017 Mar;197(3 Pt 1):640-646
pubmed: 27613356
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777
pubmed: 29552975
Insights Imaging. 2018 Feb;9(1):87-101
pubmed: 29063480
Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):618-629
pubmed: 27568654
JAMA. 2015 Jan 27;313(4):390-7
pubmed: 25626035
Radiology. 2013 Jul;268(1):144-52
pubmed: 23468576
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2019 May;25(3):183-188
pubmed: 31063138