Monocular Deprivation Affects Visual Cortex Plasticity Through cPKCγ-Modulated GluR1 Phosphorylation in Mice.
Analysis of Variance
Animals
Disease Models, Animal
Electroretinography
Female
Fluorescent Antibody Technique
Male
Mice
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Mice, Knockout
Neuronal Plasticity
Phosphorylation
/ genetics
Protein Kinase C
/ genetics
Protein Kinase C-epsilon
/ genetics
Random Allocation
Receptors, AMPA
/ genetics
Sensory Deprivation
Synaptic Transmission
Vision, Monocular
/ physiology
Visual Cortex
/ physiology
Visual Pathways
/ physiology
Journal
Investigative ophthalmology & visual science
ISSN: 1552-5783
Titre abrégé: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7703701
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 04 2020
09 04 2020
Historique:
entrez:
29
4
2020
pubmed:
29
4
2020
medline:
29
8
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To determine how visual cortex plasticity changes after monocular deprivation (MD) in mice and whether conventional protein kinase C gamma (cPKCγ) plays a role in visual cortex plasticity. cPKCγ membrane translocation levels were quantified by using immunoblotting to explore the effects of MD on cPKCγ activation. Electrophysiology was used to record field excitatory postsynaptic potential (fEPSP) amplitude with the goal of observing changes in visual cortex plasticity after MD. Immunoblotting was also used to determine the phosphorylation levels of GluR1 at Ser831. Light transmission was analyzed using electroretinography to examine the effects of MD and cPKCγ on mouse retinal function. Membrane translocation levels of cPKCγ significantly increased in the contralateral visual cortex of MD mice compared to wild-type (WT) mice (P < 0.001). In the contralateral visual cortex, long-term potentiation (LTP) and the phosphorylation levels of GluR1 at Ser 831 were increased in cPKCγ+/+ mice after MD. Interestingly, these levels could be downregulated by cPKCγ knockout compared to cPKCγ+/++MD mice (P < 0.001). Compared to the right eyes of WT mice, the amplitudes of a-waves and b-waves declined in deprived right eyes of mice after MD (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences when comparing cPKCγ+/+ and cPKCγ-/- mice with MD. cPKCγ participates in the plasticity of the visual cortex after MD, which is characterized by increased LTP in the contralateral visual cortex, which may be a result of cPKCγ-mediated phosphorylation of GluR1 at Ser 831.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32343785
pii: 2765450
doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.4.44
pmc: PMC7401946
doi:
Substances chimiques
Receptors, AMPA
0
protein kinase C gamma
EC 2.7.1.-
Protein Kinase C
EC 2.7.11.13
Protein Kinase C-epsilon
EC 2.7.11.13
glutamate receptor ionotropic, AMPA 1
TFZ3H25BS1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
44Références
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018 Jun 12;500(4):917-923
pubmed: 29705702
J Biochem. 2002 Nov;132(5):683-7
pubmed: 12417016
Optometry. 2005 Oct;76(10):579-87
pubmed: 16230273
Neuron. 2004 Dec 16;44(6):917-23
pubmed: 15603735
J Neurosci. 2018 Dec 5;38(49):10489-10504
pubmed: 30355630
Cell. 2003 Mar 7;112(5):631-43
pubmed: 12628184
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1977 Apr 26;278(961):377-409
pubmed: 19791
Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2016 Oct 14;2:17-35
pubmed: 28532358
Neuron. 2004 Dec 16;44(6):1021-30
pubmed: 15603744
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017 Jan;37(1):71-81
pubmed: 27774623
Cell Signal. 2007 Sep;19(9):1820-9
pubmed: 17629453
Neurosci Bull. 2012 Apr;28(2):111-20
pubmed: 22466122
J Neurosci. 2011 Oct 5;31(40):14324-34
pubmed: 21976518
Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2017 Jan;21(1):23-48
pubmed: 27567276
Science. 2006 Aug 25;313(5790):1093-7
pubmed: 16931756
Neuropharmacology. 2018 Jan;128:207-220
pubmed: 29031852
Curr Eye Res. 2013 Jul;38(7):802-9
pubmed: 23521720
Neurochem Int. 2011 May;58(6):684-92
pubmed: 21335048
Nature. 2014 Nov 13;515(7526):274-8
pubmed: 25307057
Exp Eye Res. 2018 Dec;177:50-54
pubmed: 30059666
Exp Eye Res. 2014 Aug;125:142-55
pubmed: 24950064
J Neurophysiol. 1963 Nov;26:1003-17
pubmed: 14084161
Growth Factors. 2015;33(3):192-9
pubmed: 26115368
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Oct;45(10):3531-7
pubmed: 15452059
Neurochem Res. 2015 Mar;40(3):524-30
pubmed: 25576091
J Neurochem. 2014 Dec;131(5):582-7
pubmed: 25230927
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Jul;56(8):4961-74
pubmed: 26230760
Vision Res. 1974 Nov;14(11):1223-7
pubmed: 4428630
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Mar 5;372(1715):
pubmed: 28093553
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Sep 26;369(1652):
pubmed: 25135969
J Neurosci. 2014 Feb 12;34(7):2571-82
pubmed: 24523547
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1085:17-20
pubmed: 30578478
Mol Psychiatry. 2015 May;20(5):621-31
pubmed: 25092246
Front Cell Neurosci. 2013 Dec 26;7:281
pubmed: 24421757
J Diabetes Res. 2018 Mar 18;2018:8431249
pubmed: 29744369
Neuron. 2012 Jul 26;75(2):230-49
pubmed: 22841309
J Neurosci. 2012 Sep 19;32(38):13004-9
pubmed: 22993418
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2015 Apr-Jun;10(2):144-50
pubmed: 26425316
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jun 30;112(26):8094-9
pubmed: 26080443
Cell Rep. 2018 Jan 16;22(3):576-584
pubmed: 29346758
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2019 Jun 3;60(7):2676-2684
pubmed: 31242289
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 7;7(1):4912
pubmed: 28687800
J Mol Neurosci. 2017 Oct;63(2):131-141
pubmed: 28842814
Neuroscience. 2016 Jul 7;327:64-78
pubmed: 27090818
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Jun;17(6):1283-91
pubmed: 16831856
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Dec;7(12):1353-9
pubmed: 15543139
J Cell Mol Med. 2017 Dec;21(12):3641-3657
pubmed: 28726275
Neuron. 2014 May 21;82(4):859-71
pubmed: 24794094
Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 2013;(197):9-18
pubmed: 23480151
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 22;114(34):9182-9187
pubmed: 28790183
Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;160:481-493
pubmed: 31277870