Diagnostic Drama. Use of ICDAS II and Fluorescence-Based Intraoral Camera in Early Occlusal Caries Detection: A Clinical Study.
ICDAS-II
VistaCam
caries detection
caries diagnostics
dentine caries
fluorescence camera
occlusal caries
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 04 2020
24 04 2020
Historique:
received:
23
03
2020
revised:
17
04
2020
accepted:
18
04
2020
entrez:
30
4
2020
pubmed:
30
4
2020
medline:
2
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Early diagnosis of occlusal caries is of paramount importance for a minimally invasive approach in dentistry. The aim of the present in vivo clinical prospective study was to compare the diagnostic outcomes of visual subjective evaluation between the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS-II) and an intraoral fluorescence-based camera (VistaCam iX Proof, Dürr Dental, Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany) for the detection of pits and fissures in early caries lesions of posterior teeth. The study included 1011 posterior teeth in 255 patients aged 13-20 years (mean age 16 ± 2.2 years). Two blinded operators evaluated all the occlusal surfaces and the first assigned an ICDAS-II code, while the second assessed the VistaCam score: sound enamel (score 0-1.2); initial enamel decay (score 1.2-1.5); dentine caries (score 1.5-3). Some 283 (28%) of the assessed teeth were ICDAS-II code 0; 334 (33%) code 1; 189 (18.7%) code 2; 176 (17.4%) code 3; and 29 (2.9%) code 4. The level of agreement between the two procedures was expressed by using Cohen's and Fleiss' kappa statistics and performing McNemar's test. VistaCam assessed in 513 (50.7%) sound enamel; in 292 (28.9%) initial enamel decay; and in 206 (20.4%) dentine caries. This comparative study showed a poor agreement between the two diagnostic methods, especially between ICDAS-II 0, 1 and 2 codes and fluorescence assessments.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Early diagnosis of occlusal caries is of paramount importance for a minimally invasive approach in dentistry. The aim of the present in vivo clinical prospective study was to compare the diagnostic outcomes of visual subjective evaluation between the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS-II) and an intraoral fluorescence-based camera (VistaCam iX Proof, Dürr Dental, Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany) for the detection of pits and fissures in early caries lesions of posterior teeth.
METHODS
The study included 1011 posterior teeth in 255 patients aged 13-20 years (mean age 16 ± 2.2 years). Two blinded operators evaluated all the occlusal surfaces and the first assigned an ICDAS-II code, while the second assessed the VistaCam score: sound enamel (score 0-1.2); initial enamel decay (score 1.2-1.5); dentine caries (score 1.5-3).
RESULTS
Some 283 (28%) of the assessed teeth were ICDAS-II code 0; 334 (33%) code 1; 189 (18.7%) code 2; 176 (17.4%) code 3; and 29 (2.9%) code 4. The level of agreement between the two procedures was expressed by using Cohen's and Fleiss' kappa statistics and performing McNemar's test. VistaCam assessed in 513 (50.7%) sound enamel; in 292 (28.9%) initial enamel decay; and in 206 (20.4%) dentine caries.
CONCLUSIONS
This comparative study showed a poor agreement between the two diagnostic methods, especially between ICDAS-II 0, 1 and 2 codes and fluorescence assessments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32344544
pii: ijerph17082937
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082937
pmc: PMC7215869
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
J Conserv Dent. 2009 Jan;12(1):10-6
pubmed: 20379434
Int J Dent. 2012;2012:371595
pubmed: 22973311
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2016 Jun;14(3):87-94
pubmed: 27048473
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1999 Oct;27(5):331-7
pubmed: 10503793
BMC Oral Health. 2018 Jul 6;18(1):122
pubmed: 29980199
Caries Res. 2008;42(2):79-87
pubmed: 18204251
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Mar 7;19(1):41
pubmed: 30845943
J Biomed Opt. 2015 Apr;20(4):040901
pubmed: 25875625
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2015 Dec;1(2):74-79
pubmed: 27818788
Clin Ter. 2018 Jan-Feb;169(1):e5-e9
pubmed: 29446784
BMC Oral Health. 2013 Dec 06;13:70
pubmed: 24314305
Odontology. 2017 Jul;105(3):283-290
pubmed: 27655625
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 25;12(8):e0183432
pubmed: 28841688
Lasers Med Sci. 2015 Feb;30(2):843-9
pubmed: 24142047
Curr Oral Health Rep. 2015;2(2):102-109
pubmed: 26317065
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Jul;8(7):ZE04-8
pubmed: 25177659
Aust Dent J. 2013 Jun;58 Suppl 1:40-59
pubmed: 23721337
Odontology. 2014 Jul;102(2):330-5
pubmed: 23467922