Genomic Analysis Using Bayesian Methods under Different Genotyping Platforms in Korean Duroc Pigs.
Duroc
genome-wide association study
genomic breeding value
single nucleotide polymorphism
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Apr 2020
25 Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
17
03
2020
revised:
16
04
2020
accepted:
22
04
2020
entrez:
30
4
2020
pubmed:
30
4
2020
medline:
30
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Genomic evaluation has been widely applied to several species using commercial single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping platforms. This study investigated the informative genomic regions and the efficiency of genomic prediction by using two Bayesian approaches (BayesB and BayesC) under two moderate-density SNP genotyping panels in Korean Duroc pigs. Growth and production records of 1026 individuals were genotyped using two medium-density, SNP genotyping platforms: Illumina60K and GeneSeek80K. These platforms consisted of 61,565 and 68,528 SNP markers, respectively. The deregressed estimated breeding values (DEBVs) derived from estimated breeding values (EBVs) and their reliabilities were taken as response variables. Two Bayesian approaches were implemented to perform the genome-wide association study (GWAS) and genomic prediction. Multiple significant regions for days to 90 kg (DAYS), lean muscle area (LMA), and lean percent (PCL) were detected. The most significant SNP marker, located near the MC4R gene, was detected using GeneSeek80K. Accuracy of genomic predictions was higher using the GeneSeek80K SNP panel for DAYS (Δ2%) and LMA (Δ2-3%) with two response variables, with no gains in accuracy by the Bayesian approaches in four growth and production-related traits. Genomic prediction is best derived from DEBVs including parental information as a response variable between two DEBVs regardless of the genotyping platform and the Bayesian method for genomic prediction accuracy in Korean Duroc pig breeding.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32344859
pii: ani10050752
doi: 10.3390/ani10050752
pmc: PMC7277155
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Genet Sel Evol. 2010 Mar 01;42:7
pubmed: 20193071
Genet Sel Evol. 2017 Jul 3;49(1):54
pubmed: 28673233
J Anim Sci. 2017 Aug;95(8):3406-3414
pubmed: 28805929
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Jul;95(7):4114-29
pubmed: 22720968
BMC Genet. 2013 Feb 21;14:8
pubmed: 23433396
Genet Sel Evol. 2011 Mar 02;43:10
pubmed: 21366914
PLoS Genet. 2009 Jun;5(6):e1000529
pubmed: 19543373
J Endocrinol. 2004 Apr;181(1):39-52
pubmed: 15072565
Am J Hum Genet. 2009 Feb;84(2):210-23
pubmed: 19200528
J Anim Sci. 2014 Feb;92(2):485-97
pubmed: 24431338
Genet Sel Evol. 2011 Nov 28;43:40
pubmed: 22122853
Genet Sel Evol. 2009 Dec 31;41:55
pubmed: 20043827
Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1019:275-98
pubmed: 23756895
Genetics. 2014 Oct;198(2):483-95
pubmed: 25009151
Genet Sel Evol. 2015 May 09;47:43
pubmed: 25956961
Genet Sel Evol. 2012 Jun 19;44:9
pubmed: 22462519
Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Nov 4;48(1):83
pubmed: 27809758
J Anim Breed Genet. 2010 Dec;127(6):423-32
pubmed: 21077966
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Aug;95(8):4657-65
pubmed: 22818480
Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2004 Jan;26(1):75-86
pubmed: 14732454
Br J Pharmacol. 2006 Dec;149(7):815-27
pubmed: 17043670
Mamm Genome. 2000 Feb;11(2):131-5
pubmed: 10656927
J Anim Sci. 2010 Feb;88(2):544-51
pubmed: 19820059
J Anim Sci. 2019 Jul 2;97(7):2793-2802
pubmed: 31087081
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Jul;96(7):4666-77
pubmed: 23684022
Genetics. 2001 Apr;157(4):1819-29
pubmed: 11290733
Anim Genet. 2009 Aug;40(4):401-9
pubmed: 19397528
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 May 23;12:186
pubmed: 21605355
BMC Genomics. 2014 Jun 17;15:478
pubmed: 24935670
Peptides. 2005 Oct;26(10):1909-19
pubmed: 16083993
Genet Sel Evol. 2012 Dec 07;44:38
pubmed: 23216608