Effect of guided counseling on nutritional status of pregnant women in West Gojjam zone, Ethiopia: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.
Guided counseling
Intervention
Nutritional status
Pregnant women
Journal
Nutrition journal
ISSN: 1475-2891
Titre abrégé: Nutr J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101152213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 04 2020
28 04 2020
Historique:
received:
20
11
2019
accepted:
26
02
2020
entrez:
30
4
2020
pubmed:
30
4
2020
medline:
8
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Undernutrition during pregnancy affects birth outcomes adversely. In Ethiopia, despite nutrition counseling on the maternal diet being given by the health workers during pregnancy, maternal undernutrition is still high in the country. Hence, this study aimed to assess the effect of guided counseling using the health belief model and the theory of planned behavior on the nutritional status of pregnant women. A two-arm parallel cluster randomized controlled community trial was conducted in West Gojjam Zone, Ethiopia, from May 1, 2018, to April 30, 2019. The nutritional status of the women was assessed using mid-upper arm circumference. A total of 694 pregnant women were recruited from the intervention (n=346 ) and control (n=348) clusters. Of which endline data were collected from 313 and 332 pregnant women in the intervention and control clusters, respectively. The intervention was started before 16 weeks of gestation and pregnant women in the intervention group attended 4 counseling sessions. Counseling was given at the participants' homes using a counseling guide with the core contents of the intervention. Leaflets with appropriate pictures and the core messages were given for women in the intervention arm. Women in the control group got the routine nutrition education given by the health care system. Data were collected using interviewer administered structured questionnaires and mid-upper arm circumference was measured using an adult MUAC tape. Descriptive statistics and linear mixed-effects model were used to assess the intervention effect after adjusting for potential confounders. After the intervention, the prevalence of undernutrition was 16.7% lower in the intervention group compared with the control arm (30.6% Vs 47.3%, P = < 0.001). Women in the intervention group showed significant improvement in nutritional status at the end of the trial than the control group (β = 0.615, p = < 0.001). This study demonstrated that guided counseling using the health belief model and the theory of planned behavior was effective in improving the nutritional status of pregnant women. The results imply the need for the design of model and theory based nutrition counseling guidelines. The trial was registered in Clinical Trials.gov (NCT03627156).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Undernutrition during pregnancy affects birth outcomes adversely. In Ethiopia, despite nutrition counseling on the maternal diet being given by the health workers during pregnancy, maternal undernutrition is still high in the country. Hence, this study aimed to assess the effect of guided counseling using the health belief model and the theory of planned behavior on the nutritional status of pregnant women.
METHODS
A two-arm parallel cluster randomized controlled community trial was conducted in West Gojjam Zone, Ethiopia, from May 1, 2018, to April 30, 2019. The nutritional status of the women was assessed using mid-upper arm circumference. A total of 694 pregnant women were recruited from the intervention (n=346 ) and control (n=348) clusters. Of which endline data were collected from 313 and 332 pregnant women in the intervention and control clusters, respectively. The intervention was started before 16 weeks of gestation and pregnant women in the intervention group attended 4 counseling sessions. Counseling was given at the participants' homes using a counseling guide with the core contents of the intervention. Leaflets with appropriate pictures and the core messages were given for women in the intervention arm. Women in the control group got the routine nutrition education given by the health care system. Data were collected using interviewer administered structured questionnaires and mid-upper arm circumference was measured using an adult MUAC tape. Descriptive statistics and linear mixed-effects model were used to assess the intervention effect after adjusting for potential confounders.
RESULTS
After the intervention, the prevalence of undernutrition was 16.7% lower in the intervention group compared with the control arm (30.6% Vs 47.3%, P = < 0.001). Women in the intervention group showed significant improvement in nutritional status at the end of the trial than the control group (β = 0.615, p = < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
This study demonstrated that guided counseling using the health belief model and the theory of planned behavior was effective in improving the nutritional status of pregnant women. The results imply the need for the design of model and theory based nutrition counseling guidelines. The trial was registered in Clinical Trials.gov (NCT03627156).
Identifiants
pubmed: 32345286
doi: 10.1186/s12937-020-00536-w
pii: 10.1186/s12937-020-00536-w
pmc: PMC7189500
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03627156']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
38Références
Food Nutr Bull. 2012 Jun;33(2 Suppl):S27-50
pubmed: 22913106
Matern Child Nutr. 2016 Jan;12(1):51-63
pubmed: 24985910
J Am Diet Assoc. 2010 Jun;110(6):879-91
pubmed: 20497777
Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(4):373-4
pubmed: 11357217
JAMA. 2011 May 18;305(19):1986-95
pubmed: 21586714
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21;7(8):e015393
pubmed: 28827238
Matern Child Nutr. 2017 Oct;13(4):
pubmed: 27896937
Ann Behav Med. 2009 Dec;38 Suppl 1:S37-46
pubmed: 19787306
Curr Dev Nutr. 2019 May 16;3(7):nzz026
pubmed: 31240272
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jan 6;20(1):18
pubmed: 31906981
Am J Hum Biol. 2017 Mar;29(2):
pubmed: 28117514
BMC Nutr. 2017 Feb 27;3:18
pubmed: 32153800
Indian J Pediatr. 2006 Aug;73(8):687-92
pubmed: 16936363
Matern Child Nutr. 2017 Apr;13(2):
pubmed: 27373896
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;44(3):1051-67
pubmed: 26174515
J Educ Health Promot. 2013 Mar 31;2:15
pubmed: 24083265
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 22;14(4):e0215305
pubmed: 31009475
Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2018 Sep 12;4:18
pubmed: 30214818
J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2019;94(1):1
pubmed: 30679877
Reprod Health. 2018 Jun 22;15(Suppl 1):87
pubmed: 29945648
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332
pubmed: 20332509
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Jun 25;8(2):230-9
pubmed: 26383208
Lancet. 2013 Aug 3;382(9890):427-451
pubmed: 23746772
J Pregnancy. 2013;2013:368461
pubmed: 23476780
J Public Health Dent. 2011 Winter;71(s1):S52-S63
pubmed: 21499543
BMJ. 2018 Jun 13;361:k2252
pubmed: 29899012
J Cancer Surviv. 2015 Jun;9(2):305-38
pubmed: 25432633
Adv Nutr. 2019 Jul 1;10(4):685-695
pubmed: 31041446
J Nutr Metab. 2018 Jun 21;2018:6731815
pubmed: 30034866
Nutrients. 2019 Mar 15;11(3):
pubmed: 30875943
Health Psychol. 2004 Sep;23(5):443-51
pubmed: 15367063
S Afr Med J. 2017 Jun 30;107(7):606-610
pubmed: 29025451
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 26;14(3):e0214358
pubmed: 30913234