The reliability and validity of the International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data set in people with spinal cord injuries from a middle-income country: a psychometric study of the Thai version.
Journal
Spinal cord
ISSN: 1476-5624
Titre abrégé: Spinal Cord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9609749
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
received:
11
12
2019
accepted:
06
04
2020
revised:
04
04
2020
pubmed:
30
4
2020
medline:
29
6
2021
entrez:
30
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A cross-sectional study. To examine psychometric properties, including internal consistency, construct validity, and test-retest reliability, of the Thai version of the International Spinal Cord Injury (ISCI) Quality of Life Basic Data Set (QoL-BDS). Outpatient rehabilitation clinic, urodynamic clinic, and rehabilitation ward at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital. Participants were assigned to complete two assessment tools, the Thai version of QoL-BDS which consisted of three single items on satisfaction with life as a whole, physical health and psychological health, and the Thai version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life instrument (WHOQOL-BREF) completed by face to face interview. After 2 weeks, the participants were evaluated the QoL-BDS again via telephone interviewing to assess test-retest reliability. One hundred and thirty people with spinal cord injury (SCI) were included in the study. Of all participants, 103 people had a traumatic SCI. The mean (SD) age was 43.0 (13.1) years and the median (IQR) time after SCI was 7.5 (1-14) years. The Thai version of QoL-BDS had good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89), fair to good construct validity (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient of 0.43-0.57, p < 0.01) and good to excellent test-retest reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.73-0.86). The Thai version of QoL-BDS had acceptable psychometric properties. As it is concise, QoL-BDS should be encouraged in healthcare providers to investigate QoL in people with SCI, especially in middle-income countries.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32346121
doi: 10.1038/s41393-020-0468-9
pii: 10.1038/s41393-020-0468-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1015-1021Références
Cieza A, Kirchberger I, Biering-Sorensen F, Baumberger M, Charlifue S, Post MW, et al. ICF Core Sets for individuals with spinal cord injury in the long-term context. Spinal Cord. 2010;48:305–12.
doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.183
Migliorini CE, New PW, Tonge BJ. Quality of life in adults with spinal cord injury living in the community. Spinal Cord. 2011;49:365–70.
doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.102
Tulsky DS, Kisala PA, Victorson D, Tate DG, Heinemann AW, Charlifue S, et al. Overview of the Spinal Cord Injury-Quality of Life (SCI-QOL) measurement system. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015;38:257–69.
doi: 10.1179/2045772315Y.0000000023
Hill MR, Noonan VK, Sakakibara BM, Miller WC. SCIRE Research team. Quality of life instruments and definitions in individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord. 2010;48:438–50.
doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.164
Whitehurst DG, Noonan VK, Dvorak MF, Bryan S. A review of preference-based health-related quality of life questionnaires in spinal cord injury research. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:646–54.
doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.46
Hwang HF, Liang WM, Chiu YN, Lin MR. Suitability of the WHOQOL-BREF for community-dwelling older people in Taiwan. Age Ageing. 2003;32:593–600.
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afg102
Charlifue S, Post MW, Biering-Sorensen F, Catz A, Dijkers M, Geyh S, et al. International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data Set. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:672–5.
doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.27
Biering-Sorensen F, Charlifue S, DeVivo M, Noonan V, Post M, Stripling T, et al. International Spinal Cord Injury Data Sets. Spinal Cord. 2006;44:530–4.
doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101930
Post MW, Adriaansen JJ, Charlifue S, Biering-Sorensen F, van Asbeck FW. Good validity of the international spinal cord injury quality of life basic data set. Spinal Cord. 2016;54:314–8.
doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.99
New PW, Tate DG, Forchheimer MB, D’Andrea Greve JM, Parashar D, Post MWM. Preliminary psychometric analyses of the International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data Set. Spinal Cord. 2019;57:789–95.
doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0273-5
Post MWM, Forchheimer MB, Charlifue S, D’Andrea Greve JM, New PW, Tate DG. Reproducibility of the international spinal cord injury quality of life basic data set: an international psychometric study. Spinal Cord. 2019;57:992–8.
doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0302-4
Post MW, Nooijen CF, Postma K, Dekkers J, Penninx F, van den Berg-Emons RJ, et al. People with spinal cord injury in the Netherlands. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;96(2 Suppl 1):S93–5.
doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000619
Richards C, MacKenzie N, Roberts S, Escorpizo R. People with spinal cord injury in the United States. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;96(2 Suppl 1):S124–S126.
doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000620
Kovindha A. People with spinal cord injury in Thailand. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;96(2 Suppl 1):S120–3.
doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000585
Biering-Sorensen F, Alexander MS, Burns S, Charlifue S, DeVivo M, Dietz V, et al. Recommendations for translation and reliability testing of International Spinal Cord Injury Data Sets. Spinal Cord. 2011;49:357–60.
doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.153
Bonett DG, Wright TA. Sample size requirements for estimating pearson, kendall and spearman correlations. Psychometrika. 2000;65:23–8.
doi: 10.1007/BF02294183
Biering-Sorensen F, DeVivo MJ, Charlifue S, Chen Y, New PW, Noonan V, et al. International Spinal Cord Injury Core Data Set (version 2.0)-including standardization of reporting. Spinal Cord. 2017;55:759–64.
doi: 10.1038/sc.2017.59
DeVivo M, Biering-Sorensen F, Charlifue S, Noonan V, Post M, Stripling T, et al. International Spinal Cord Injury Core Data Set. Spinal Cord. 2006;44:535–40.
doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101958
Phungrassami T, Katikarn R, Watanaarepornchai S, Sangtawan D. Quality of life assessment in radiotherapy patients by WHOQOL-BREF-THAI: a feasibility study. J Med Assoc Thai. 2004;87:1459–65.
pubmed: 15822541
Sakthong P, Schommer JC, Gross CR, Sakulbumrungsil R, Prasithsirikul W. Psychometric properties of WHOQOL-BREF-THAI in patients with HIV/AIDS. J Med Assoc Thai. 2007;90:2449–60.
pubmed: 18181334
McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995;4:293–307.
doi: 10.1007/BF01593882
Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
Wongsa S, Tongprasert S, Kovindha A. Quality of life of primary caregivers of disabled people with spinal cord injury by using Short Form-36 Questionnaire. J Thai Rehabil Med. 2011;21:28–33.
Lucke KT, Cocia H, Lucke JF. Quality of life in spinal cord injured individuals and their caregivers during the initial 6 months following rehabilitation. Qual Life Res. 2004;13:97–110.
doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000015284.95515.17
Elfstrom ML, Kreuter M, Ryden A, Persson LO, Sullivan M. Effects of coping on psychological outcome when controlling for background variables: a study of traumatically spinal cord lesioned persons. Spinal Cord. 2002;40:408–15.
doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101299
Manns PJ, Chad KE. Determining the relation between quality of life, handicap, fitness, and physical activity for persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1566–71.
doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90331-3