Enhanced rhamnolipids production using a novel bioreactor system based on integrated foam-control and repeated fed-batch fermentation strategy.
Ex situ foam control
Foam reduction
Repeated fed-batch
Rhamnolipids
Journal
Biotechnology for biofuels
ISSN: 1754-6834
Titre abrégé: Biotechnol Biofuels
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101316935
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
16
01
2020
accepted:
13
04
2020
entrez:
30
4
2020
pubmed:
30
4
2020
medline:
30
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Rhamnolipids are the best known microbial-derived biosurfactants, which has attracted great interest as potential ''green" alternative for synthetic surfactants. However, rhamnolipids are the major contributors to severe foam problems, which greatly inhibit the economics of industrial-scale production. In this study, a novel foam-control system was established for ex situ dealing with the massive overflowing foam. Based on the designed facility, foam reduction efficiency, rhamnolipids production by batch and repeated fed-batch fermentation were comprehensively investigated. An ex situ foam-control system was developed to control the massive overflowing foam and improve rhamnolipids production. It was found that the size of individual bubble in the early stage was much larger than that of late fermentation stage. The foam liquefaction efficiency decreased from 54.37% at the beginning to only 9.23% at the end of the fermentation. This difference of bubble stability directly resulted in higher foam reduction efficiency of 67.46% in the early stage, whereas the small uniform bubbles can only be reduced by 57.53% at the later fermentation stage. Moreover, reduction of secondary foam is very important for foam controlling. Two improved designs of the device in this study obtained about 20% improvement of foam reduction efficiency, respectively. The batch fermentation result showed that the average volume of the overflowing foam was reduced from 58-640 to 19-216 mL/min during the fermentation process, presenting a notable reduction efficiency ranging from 51.92 to 73.47%. Meanwhile, rhamnolipids production of batch fermentation reached 45.63 g/L, and the yield 0.76 g/g was significantly better than ever reported. Further, a repeated fed-batch fermentation based on the overall optimization was carried out. Total rhamnolipids concentration reached 48.67 g/L with the yield around of 0.67-0.83 g/g, which presented an improvement of 62% and 49% compared with conventional batch fermentation by using various kinds of defoamers, respectively. The ex situ foam-control system presented a notable reduction efficiency, which helped greatly to easily solve the severe foaming problem without any defoamer addition. Moreover, rhamnolipids production and yield by repeated fed-batch fermentation obtained prominent improvement compared to conventional batch cultivation, which can further facilitate economical rhamnolipids production at large scales.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Rhamnolipids are the best known microbial-derived biosurfactants, which has attracted great interest as potential ''green" alternative for synthetic surfactants. However, rhamnolipids are the major contributors to severe foam problems, which greatly inhibit the economics of industrial-scale production. In this study, a novel foam-control system was established for ex situ dealing with the massive overflowing foam. Based on the designed facility, foam reduction efficiency, rhamnolipids production by batch and repeated fed-batch fermentation were comprehensively investigated.
RESULTS
RESULTS
An ex situ foam-control system was developed to control the massive overflowing foam and improve rhamnolipids production. It was found that the size of individual bubble in the early stage was much larger than that of late fermentation stage. The foam liquefaction efficiency decreased from 54.37% at the beginning to only 9.23% at the end of the fermentation. This difference of bubble stability directly resulted in higher foam reduction efficiency of 67.46% in the early stage, whereas the small uniform bubbles can only be reduced by 57.53% at the later fermentation stage. Moreover, reduction of secondary foam is very important for foam controlling. Two improved designs of the device in this study obtained about 20% improvement of foam reduction efficiency, respectively. The batch fermentation result showed that the average volume of the overflowing foam was reduced from 58-640 to 19-216 mL/min during the fermentation process, presenting a notable reduction efficiency ranging from 51.92 to 73.47%. Meanwhile, rhamnolipids production of batch fermentation reached 45.63 g/L, and the yield 0.76 g/g was significantly better than ever reported. Further, a repeated fed-batch fermentation based on the overall optimization was carried out. Total rhamnolipids concentration reached 48.67 g/L with the yield around of 0.67-0.83 g/g, which presented an improvement of 62% and 49% compared with conventional batch fermentation by using various kinds of defoamers, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The ex situ foam-control system presented a notable reduction efficiency, which helped greatly to easily solve the severe foaming problem without any defoamer addition. Moreover, rhamnolipids production and yield by repeated fed-batch fermentation obtained prominent improvement compared to conventional batch cultivation, which can further facilitate economical rhamnolipids production at large scales.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32346396
doi: 10.1186/s13068-020-01716-w
pii: 1716
pmc: PMC7181576
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
80Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003 Feb;30(2):118-28
pubmed: 12612787
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2001 Jan 5;72(1):25-33
pubmed: 11084590
Nature. 2010 Jun 10;465(7299):759-62
pubmed: 20535206
Front Microbiol. 2014 Sep 02;5:454
pubmed: 25228898
Molecules. 2018 May 01;23(5):
pubmed: 29723959
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007 Aug;76(1):67-74
pubmed: 17457541
Biotechnol Prog. 2011 May-Jun;27(3):706-16
pubmed: 21567991
Biotechnol Lett. 2015 Oct;37(10):2033-8
pubmed: 26087946
Bioresour Technol. 2012 Aug;117:208-13
pubmed: 22613897
Bioresour Technol. 2017 May;232:389-397
pubmed: 28238638
AMB Express. 2018 Jul 24;8(1):122
pubmed: 30043199
Science. 1998 Mar 13;279(5357):1704-7
pubmed: 9497285
Trends Biotechnol. 2006 Nov;24(11):509-15
pubmed: 16997405
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2017 Sep 1;157:317-324
pubmed: 28609706
Microb Cell Fact. 2018 Mar 9;17(1):39
pubmed: 29523151
Biotechnol Lett. 2012 Feb;34(2):187-95
pubmed: 22038550
Biodegradation. 2019 Feb;30(1):59-69
pubmed: 30600422
Bioresour Technol. 2014 Dec;173:231-238
pubmed: 25305653
J Biotechnol. 2017 Sep 20;258:181-189
pubmed: 28723386
Bioresour Technol. 2017 Jan;224:536-543
pubmed: 27839682