Retrograde intrarenal surgery of renal stones: a critical multi-aspect evaluation of the outcomes by the Turkish Academy of Urology Prospective Study Group (ACUP Study).
Residual fragments
Retrograde intrarenal surgery
Stone management
Journal
World journal of urology
ISSN: 1433-8726
Titre abrégé: World J Urol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8307716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
27
08
2019
accepted:
09
04
2020
pubmed:
30
4
2020
medline:
23
7
2021
entrez:
30
4
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To outline and evaluate the incidence, management and follow-up of the residual fragments (RFs) following retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) of renal stones by the Turkish Academy of Urology Prospective Study Group (ACUP Study). Following the ethical committee approval, 15 centers providing data regarding the incidence, management, and follow-up of RFs after RIRS were included and all relevant information was recorded into the same electronic database program ( https://acup.uroturk.org.tr/ ) created by Turkish Urology Academy for Residual Stone Study. A total of 1112 cases underwent RIRS for renal calculi and RFs were observed in 276 cases (24.8%). Of all the parameters evaluated, our results demonstrated no statistically significant relation between preoperative DJ stenting and the presence of RFs (χ2 (1) = 158.418; p = 0.099). RFs were significantly higher in patients treated with UAS (82 patients, 29.3%) during the procedure compared to the cases who did not receive UAS (194 patients, 23.3%) (χ2 (1) = 3.999; p = 0.046). The mean period for a secondary intervention after RIRS was 28.39 (± 12.52) days. Regarding the procedures applied for RF removal, re-RIRS was the most commonly performed approach (56%). Despite the reported safe and successful outcomes, the incidence of RFs is higher, after the RIRS procedure particularly in cases with relatively larger calculi. Such cases need to be followed in a close manner and although a second flexible ureteroscopy is the treatment of choice for fragment removal in the majority of these patients, shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy may also be preferred in selected cases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32347334
doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03210-2
pii: 10.1007/s00345-020-03210-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
549-554Références
Park HK, Kim JH, Min GE, Choi WS, Li S, Chung KJ, Chung BI. Change of trends in the treatment modality for pediatric nephrolithiasis: retrospective analysis of a US-based insurance claims database. J Endourol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0154 (Epub ahead of print; PubMed PMID: 31016995)
Secker A, Rassweiler J, Neisius A (2019) Future perspectives of flexible ureteroscopy. Curr Opin Urol 29(2):113–117. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000575 (PubMed PMID: 30668555)
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000575
pubmed: 30668555
Beck EM, Riehle RA (1991) The fate of residual fragments after SWL monotherapy of infection stones. J Urol 145:6–10
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)38230-7
Atis G, Pelit ES, Culpan M et al (2018) The fate of residual fragments after retrograde intrarenal surgery in long-term follow-up. Urol J. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v0i0.4124 (PubMed PMID: 30033513)
doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4124
Schoenthaler M, Wilhelm K, Kuehhas FE, Farin E, Bach C, Buchholz N, Miernik A (2012) Postureteroscopic lesion scale: a new management modified organ injury scale–evaluation in 435 ureteroscopic patients. J Endourol 26(11):1425–1430. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2012.0227
Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2
Akand M, Sarıca K, Kiremit MC, Soytaş M, Güven S (2019) Development of a prospective data registry system for retrograde intrarenal surgery in renal stones: Turkish Academy of Urology Prospective Study Group (ACUP study). Turk J Urol. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2019.19143 (Epub ahead of print; PubMed PMID: 31747366)
Skolarikos A (2012) Management of residual stone fragments. In: Smith AD, Badlani GH, Preminger GM, Kavoussi LR (eds) Smith’s Endourology, 3rd edn. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, pp 662–674
doi: 10.1002/9781444345148.ch58
Kiremit MC, Guven S, Sarica K, Ozturk A, Buldu I, Kafkasli A, Balasar M, Istanbulluoglu O, Horuz R, Cetinel CA, Kandemir A, Albayrak S (2015) Contemporary management of medium-sized (10–20 mm) renal stones: a retrospective multicenter observational study. J Endourol 29(7):838–843. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0698 (Epub 2015 Mar 6; PubMed PMID: 25578510)
doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0698
pubmed: 25578510
Suarez-Ibarrola R, Hein S, Miernik A (2019) Residual stone fragments: clinical implications and technological innovations. Curr Opin Urol 29(2):129–134. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000571 (PubMed PMID: 30407220)
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000571
pubmed: 30407220
Pearle MS, Watamull LM, Mullican MA (1999) Sensitivity of noncontrast helical computerized tomography and plain film radiography compared to flexible nephroscopy for detecting residual fragments after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 162:23
doi: 10.1097/00005392-199907000-00006
Fabrizio MD, Behari A, Bagley DH (1998) Ureteroscopic management of intrarenal calculi. J Urol 159:1139
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)63531-6
Sofer M, Watterson JD, Wollin TA et al (2002) Holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi in 598 patients. J Urol 167:31
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65376-1
Erhard M, Salwen J, Bagley DH (1996) Uretero- scopic removal of mid and proximal ureteral calculi. J Urol 155:38
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66533-9
Jiang H, Wu Z, Ding Q et al (2007) Ureteroscopic treatment of ureteral calculi with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy. J Endourol 21:151
doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0209
Parker BD, Frederick RW, Reilly TP et al (2004) Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser. Urology 64:1102
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.07.040
Rippel CA, Nikkel L, Lin YK, Danawala Z, Olorunnisomo V, Youssef RF, Pearle MS, Lotan Y, Raman JD (2012) Residual fragments following ureteroscopic lithotripsy: incidence and predictors on postoperative computerized tomography. J Urol. 188(6):2246–2251
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.040
Macejko A, Okotie OT, Zhao LC et al (2009) Computed tomography-determined stone-free rates for ure- teroscopy of upper-tract stones. J Endourol 23:379
doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0240
Ozgor F, Simsek A, Binbay M, Akman T, Kucuktopcu O, Sarilar O, Muslumanoglu AY, Berberoglu Y (2014) Clinically insignificant residual fragments after flexible ureterorenoscopy: medium-term follow-up results. Urolithiasis 42(6):533–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-014-0691-y (Epub 2014 Aug 1; PubMed PMID:25081327)
doi: 10.1007/s00240-014-0691-y
pubmed: 25081327
de la Rosette J, Denstedt J, Geavlete P, Keeley F, Matsuda T, Pearle M, Preminger G, Traxer O, CROES URS Study Group (2014) The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: indications, complications, andoutcomes in 11,885 patients. J Endourol 28(2):131–139. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0436 (Epub 2013 Dec 17; PubMed PMID: 24147820)
Portis AJ, Rygwall R, Holtz C et al (2006) Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi with active fragment extraction and computerized tomography followup. J Urol 175:2129
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00311-9
Perlmutter AE, Talug C, Tarry WF et al (2008) Impact of stone location on success rates of endoscopic lithotripsy for nephrolithiasis. Urology 71:214
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.023
Resorlu B, Oguz U, Resorlu EB et al (2012) The impact of pelvicaliceal anatomy on the success of retro- grade intrarenal surgery in patients with lower pole renal stones. Urology 79:6
doi: 10.5301/RU.2012.9032
Patel N, Chew B, Knudsen B, Lipkin M, Wenzler D, Sur RL (2014) Accuracy of endoscopic intraoperative assessment of urologic stone size. J Endourol 28(5):582–586. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0707 (Epub 2014 Jan 22; PubMed PMID:24341294)
doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0707
pubmed: 24341294