The Development of the Military Service Identification Tool: Identifying Military Veterans in a Clinical Research Database Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning.
electronic health care records
machine learning
mental health
military personnel
natural language processing
veteran
Journal
JMIR medical informatics
ISSN: 2291-9694
Titre abrégé: JMIR Med Inform
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101645109
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 May 2020
25 May 2020
Historique:
received:
13
08
2019
accepted:
26
01
2020
revised:
11
12
2019
pubmed:
30
4
2020
medline:
30
4
2020
entrez:
30
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Electronic health care records (EHRs) are a rich source of health-related information, with potential for secondary research use. In the United Kingdom, there is no national marker for identifying those who have previously served in the Armed Forces, making analysis of the health and well-being of veterans using EHRs difficult. This study aimed to develop a tool to identify veterans from free-text clinical documents recorded in a psychiatric EHR database. Veterans were manually identified using the South London and Maudsley (SLaM) Biomedical Research Centre Clinical Record Interactive Search-a database holding secondary mental health care electronic records for the SLaM National Health Service Foundation Trust. An iterative approach was taken; first, a structured query language (SQL) method was developed, which was then refined using natural language processing and machine learning to create the Military Service Identification Tool (MSIT) to identify if a patient was a civilian or veteran. Performance, defined as correct classification of veterans compared with incorrect classification, was measured using positive predictive value, negative predictive value, sensitivity, F1 score, and accuracy (otherwise termed Youden Index). A gold standard dataset of 6672 free-text clinical documents was manually annotated by human coders. Of these documents, 66.00% (4470/6672) were then used to train the SQL and MSIT approaches and 34.00% (2202/6672) were used for testing the approaches. To develop the MSIT, an iterative 2-stage approach was undertaken. In the first stage, an SQL method was developed to identify veterans using a keyword rule-based approach. This approach obtained an accuracy of 0.93 in correctly predicting civilians and veterans, a positive predictive value of 0.81, a sensitivity of 0.75, and a negative predictive value of 0.95. This method informed the second stage, which was the development of the MSIT using machine learning, which, when tested, obtained an accuracy of 0.97, a positive predictive value of 0.90, a sensitivity of 0.91, and a negative predictive value of 0.98. The MSIT has the potential to be used in identifying veterans in the United Kingdom from free-text clinical documents, providing new and unique insights into the health and well-being of this population and their use of mental health care services.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Electronic health care records (EHRs) are a rich source of health-related information, with potential for secondary research use. In the United Kingdom, there is no national marker for identifying those who have previously served in the Armed Forces, making analysis of the health and well-being of veterans using EHRs difficult.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to develop a tool to identify veterans from free-text clinical documents recorded in a psychiatric EHR database.
METHODS
METHODS
Veterans were manually identified using the South London and Maudsley (SLaM) Biomedical Research Centre Clinical Record Interactive Search-a database holding secondary mental health care electronic records for the SLaM National Health Service Foundation Trust. An iterative approach was taken; first, a structured query language (SQL) method was developed, which was then refined using natural language processing and machine learning to create the Military Service Identification Tool (MSIT) to identify if a patient was a civilian or veteran. Performance, defined as correct classification of veterans compared with incorrect classification, was measured using positive predictive value, negative predictive value, sensitivity, F1 score, and accuracy (otherwise termed Youden Index).
RESULTS
RESULTS
A gold standard dataset of 6672 free-text clinical documents was manually annotated by human coders. Of these documents, 66.00% (4470/6672) were then used to train the SQL and MSIT approaches and 34.00% (2202/6672) were used for testing the approaches. To develop the MSIT, an iterative 2-stage approach was undertaken. In the first stage, an SQL method was developed to identify veterans using a keyword rule-based approach. This approach obtained an accuracy of 0.93 in correctly predicting civilians and veterans, a positive predictive value of 0.81, a sensitivity of 0.75, and a negative predictive value of 0.95. This method informed the second stage, which was the development of the MSIT using machine learning, which, when tested, obtained an accuracy of 0.97, a positive predictive value of 0.90, a sensitivity of 0.91, and a negative predictive value of 0.98.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The MSIT has the potential to be used in identifying veterans in the United Kingdom from free-text clinical documents, providing new and unique insights into the health and well-being of this population and their use of mental health care services.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32348287
pii: v8i5e15852
doi: 10.2196/15852
pmc: PMC7281146
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e15852Informations de copyright
©Daniel Leightley, David Pernet, Sumithra Velupillai, Robert J Stewart, Katharine M Mark, Elena Opie, Dominic Murphy, Nicola T Fear, Sharon A M Stevelink. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (http://medinform.jmir.org), 25.05.2020.
Références
J Ment Health. 2019 Feb;28(1):34-41
pubmed: 30445899
Med Care. 2019 Jun;57 Suppl 6 Suppl 2:S149-S156
pubmed: 31095054
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 01;6(3):e008721
pubmed: 26932138
Digit Health. 2019 Apr 12;5:2055207619842986
pubmed: 31019722
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Dec;58:60-69
pubmed: 26385375
J Affect Disord. 2015 Sep 15;184:170-5
pubmed: 26093830
CMAJ. 2013 Mar 19;185(5):E221-8
pubmed: 23422444
Int J Med Inform. 2018 May;113:17-25
pubmed: 29602429
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Sep;105:110-120
pubmed: 28750904
Br J Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;213(6):690-697
pubmed: 30295216
Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Dec 19;8(1):
pubmed: 31861575
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 17;7(1):e012012
pubmed: 28096249
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 13;10:36
pubmed: 30814958
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2017 Jul;21(4):939-948
pubmed: 27254874
Lancet. 2010 May 22;375(9728):1783-97
pubmed: 20471076
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019 Jan 14;10(1):1556552
pubmed: 30693074
Age Ageing. 2018 Jan 1;47(1):88-94
pubmed: 28655175
Br J Psychiatry. 2010 Jul;197(1):8-10
pubmed: 20592426
BMC Psychiatry. 2009 Aug 12;9:51
pubmed: 19674459
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2013 Nov 16;2013:537-46
pubmed: 24551356
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 29;9(1):e024355
pubmed: 30700480
Sci Rep. 2018 May 9;8(1):7426
pubmed: 29743531
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Feb;82(2):118-27
pubmed: 22595284
J Biomed Inform. 2012 Jun;45(3):460-70
pubmed: 22245601
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2014 Aug;130(2):83-6
pubmed: 24730985
J Biomed Semantics. 2016 May 10;7:26
pubmed: 27175226
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 16;12(2):e0171526
pubmed: 28207753
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 May 25;8(5):e15852
pubmed: 32348287
Age Ageing. 2014 Sep;43(5):653-60
pubmed: 24598084