Determining the Optimal Outcome Measures for Studying the Social Determinants of Health.
anti-poverty policies and health
outcome measures
randomized-controlled trial
social determinants of health
social policies and health
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 04 2020
27 04 2020
Historique:
received:
26
03
2020
revised:
19
04
2020
accepted:
25
04
2020
entrez:
1
5
2020
pubmed:
1
5
2020
medline:
3
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Americans have significantly poorer health outcomes and shorter longevity than citizens of other industrialized nations. Poverty is a major driver of these poor health outcomes in the United States. Innovative anti-poverty policies may help reduce economic malaise thereby increasing the health and longevity of the most vulnerable Americans. However, there is no consensus framework for studying the health impacts of anti-poverty social policies. In this paper, we describe a case study in which leading global experts systematically: (1) developed a conceptual model that outlines the potential pathways through which a social policy influences health, (2) fits outcome measures to this conceptual model, and (3) estimates an optimal time frame for collection of the selected outcome measures. This systematic process, called the Delphi method, has the potential to produce estimates more quickly and with less bias than might be achieved through expert panel discussions alone. Our case study is a multi-component randomized-controlled trial (RCT) of a workforce policy called MyGoals for Healthy Aging.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32349268
pii: ijerph17093028
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093028
pmc: PMC7246501
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R56 AG062485
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Feb;1186:223-39
pubmed: 20201875
Work. 2010;36(4):459-63
pubmed: 20714102
Health Promot Int. 2009 Jun;24(2):185-92
pubmed: 19304737
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Apr 10;98(8):4770-5
pubmed: 11287659
Science. 2012 Sep 21;337(6101):1505-10
pubmed: 22997331
Nurse Res. 2006;14(1):59-70
pubmed: 17100214
Int J Health Serv. 1982;12(3):349-80
pubmed: 7118327
Science. 2014 Mar 28;343(6178):1478-85
pubmed: 24675955
Dev Sci. 2015 Sep;18(5):686-702
pubmed: 25659838
N Engl J Med. 1998 Jan 15;338(3):171-9
pubmed: 9428819
Milbank Q. 2020 Mar 19;:
pubmed: 32191359
Psychosom Med. 2006 May-Jun;68(3):414-20
pubmed: 16738073
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Feb;1186:5-23
pubmed: 20201865
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Jun 15;173(12):1468-74
pubmed: 21540326
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jan;74(1):75-83
pubmed: 22115943
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Feb;1186:56-68
pubmed: 20201868
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 8;372(2):109-11
pubmed: 25564896
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Nov;61(9):2018-26
pubmed: 15913866
Geroscience. 2018 Dec;40(5-6):419-436
pubmed: 30151729
N Engl J Med. 1974 Jul 25;291(4):171-7
pubmed: 4834487
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2008 May;19(2):574-9
pubmed: 18469427
N Engl J Med. 2013 May 2;368(18):1713-22
pubmed: 23635051
Health Rep. 2009 Mar;20(1):21-8
pubmed: 19388365
Psychol Health. 2008;23(3):309-26
pubmed: 25160480