Predicting potential adverse events using safety data from marketed drugs.
Adverse reaction
Classifier
Computational biology
Pharmacovigilance
Journal
BMC bioinformatics
ISSN: 1471-2105
Titre abrégé: BMC Bioinformatics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965194
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Apr 2020
29 Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
25
03
2019
accepted:
22
04
2020
entrez:
1
5
2020
pubmed:
1
5
2020
medline:
4
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
While clinical trials are considered the gold standard for detecting adverse events, often these trials are not sufficiently powered to detect difficult to observe adverse events. We developed a preliminary approach to predict 135 adverse events using post-market safety data from marketed drugs. Adverse event information available from FDA product labels and scientific literature for drugs that have the same activity at one or more of the same targets, structural and target similarities, and the duration of post market experience were used as features for a classifier algorithm. The proposed method was studied using 54 drugs and a probabilistic approach of performance evaluation using bootstrapping with 10,000 iterations. Out of 135 adverse events, 53 had high probability of having high positive predictive value. Cross validation showed that 32% of the model-predicted safety label changes occurred within four to nine years of approval (median: six years). This approach predicts 53 serious adverse events with high positive predictive values where well-characterized target-event relationships exist. Adverse events with well-defined target-event associations were better predicted compared to adverse events that may be idiosyncratic or related to secondary target effects that were poorly captured. Further enhancement of this model with additional features, such as target prediction and drug binding data, may increase accuracy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
While clinical trials are considered the gold standard for detecting adverse events, often these trials are not sufficiently powered to detect difficult to observe adverse events. We developed a preliminary approach to predict 135 adverse events using post-market safety data from marketed drugs. Adverse event information available from FDA product labels and scientific literature for drugs that have the same activity at one or more of the same targets, structural and target similarities, and the duration of post market experience were used as features for a classifier algorithm. The proposed method was studied using 54 drugs and a probabilistic approach of performance evaluation using bootstrapping with 10,000 iterations.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Out of 135 adverse events, 53 had high probability of having high positive predictive value. Cross validation showed that 32% of the model-predicted safety label changes occurred within four to nine years of approval (median: six years).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This approach predicts 53 serious adverse events with high positive predictive values where well-characterized target-event relationships exist. Adverse events with well-defined target-event associations were better predicted compared to adverse events that may be idiosyncratic or related to secondary target effects that were poorly captured. Further enhancement of this model with additional features, such as target prediction and drug binding data, may increase accuracy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32349656
doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-3509-7
pii: 10.1186/s12859-020-3509-7
pmc: PMC7191698
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
163Subventions
Organisme : Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education
ID : N/A
Références
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Mar;99(3):265-8
pubmed: 26667601
J Biomed Inform. 2014 Feb;47:171-7
pubmed: 24177320
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Jul;90(1):90-9
pubmed: 21613989
JAMA. 2017 May 9;317(18):1854-1863
pubmed: 28492899
Neuron. 2016 May 18;90(4):824-38
pubmed: 27196975
J Appl Toxicol. 2017 Mar;37(3):347-360
pubmed: 27480324
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2018 Dec;7(12):809-817
pubmed: 30354029
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 May;23(3):596-600
pubmed: 26644398
Med Care. 2012 Oct;50(10):890-7
pubmed: 22929992
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017 Feb;120(2):115-119
pubmed: 27550152
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jan 4;45(D1):D945-D954
pubmed: 27899562
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015;15 Suppl 4:S1
pubmed: 26606038
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Nov;22(11):1189-94
pubmed: 23935003
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Dec;18 Suppl 1:i73-80
pubmed: 21946238
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1990 Dec;47(12):2696-700
pubmed: 2278285
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010 Apr;56(3):276-89
pubmed: 19941924
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Apr;54:230-40
pubmed: 25688695
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001 Oct-Nov;10(6):483-6
pubmed: 11828828
Pharmacotherapy. 2004 Sep;24(9):1099-104
pubmed: 15460169
Pharmacogenomics. 2008 Oct;9(10):1543-6
pubmed: 18855540
Toxicol Pathol. 2014;42(2):435-57
pubmed: 23640381
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jan 4;46(D1):D1074-D1082
pubmed: 29126136