Understanding health professional role integration in complex adaptive systems: a multiple-case study of physician assistants in Ontario, Canada.
Case study research
Complex adaptive systems
Health policy
Interprofessional care
Physician assistant
Qualitative research
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Apr 2020
29 Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
28
08
2019
accepted:
09
03
2020
entrez:
1
5
2020
pubmed:
1
5
2020
medline:
20
11
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To meet the complex needs of healthcare delivery, the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care (MOHLTC) introduced Physician Assistants (PAs) into the Ontario health care system in 2006 with the goal of helping to increase access to care, decrease wait times, improve continuity of care and provide a flexible addition to the healthcare workforce. The characterization of healthcare organizations as complex adaptive systems (CAS) may offer insight into the relationships and interactions that optimize and restrict successful PA integration. The aim of this study is to explore the integration of PAs across multiple case settings and to understand the role of PAs within complex adaptive systems. An exploratory, multiple-case study was used to examine PA role integration in four settings: family medicine, emergency medicine, general surgery, and inpatient medicine. Interviews were conducted with 46 healthcare providers and administrators across 13 hospitals and 6 family medicine clinics in Ontario, Canada. Analysis was conducted in three phases including an inductive thematic analysis within each of the four cases, a cross-case thematic analysis, and a broader, deductive exploration of cross-case patterns pertaining to specific complexity theory principles of interest. Forty-six health care providers were interviewed across 19 different healthcare sites. Support for PA contributions across various health care settings, the importance of role awareness, supervisory relationship attributes, and role vulnerability are interconnected and dynamic. Findings represent the experiences of PAs and other healthcare providers, and demonstrate how the PAs willingness to work and ability to build relationships allows for the establishment of interprofessional, collaborative, and person-centered care. As a self-organizing agent in complex adaptive systems (i.e., health organizations), PA role exploration revealed patterns of team behavior, non-linear interconnections, open relationships, dynamic systems, and the legacy of role implementation as defined by complexity theory. By exploring the role of PAs across multiple sites, the complexity theory lens concurrently fosters an awareness of emerging patterns, relationships and non-linear interactions within the defined context of the Ontario healthcare system. By establishing collaborative, interprofessional care models in hospital and community settings, PAs are making a significant contribution to Ontario healthcare settings.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
To meet the complex needs of healthcare delivery, the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care (MOHLTC) introduced Physician Assistants (PAs) into the Ontario health care system in 2006 with the goal of helping to increase access to care, decrease wait times, improve continuity of care and provide a flexible addition to the healthcare workforce. The characterization of healthcare organizations as complex adaptive systems (CAS) may offer insight into the relationships and interactions that optimize and restrict successful PA integration. The aim of this study is to explore the integration of PAs across multiple case settings and to understand the role of PAs within complex adaptive systems.
METHODS
METHODS
An exploratory, multiple-case study was used to examine PA role integration in four settings: family medicine, emergency medicine, general surgery, and inpatient medicine. Interviews were conducted with 46 healthcare providers and administrators across 13 hospitals and 6 family medicine clinics in Ontario, Canada. Analysis was conducted in three phases including an inductive thematic analysis within each of the four cases, a cross-case thematic analysis, and a broader, deductive exploration of cross-case patterns pertaining to specific complexity theory principles of interest.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Forty-six health care providers were interviewed across 19 different healthcare sites. Support for PA contributions across various health care settings, the importance of role awareness, supervisory relationship attributes, and role vulnerability are interconnected and dynamic. Findings represent the experiences of PAs and other healthcare providers, and demonstrate how the PAs willingness to work and ability to build relationships allows for the establishment of interprofessional, collaborative, and person-centered care. As a self-organizing agent in complex adaptive systems (i.e., health organizations), PA role exploration revealed patterns of team behavior, non-linear interconnections, open relationships, dynamic systems, and the legacy of role implementation as defined by complexity theory.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
By exploring the role of PAs across multiple sites, the complexity theory lens concurrently fosters an awareness of emerging patterns, relationships and non-linear interactions within the defined context of the Ontario healthcare system. By establishing collaborative, interprofessional care models in hospital and community settings, PAs are making a significant contribution to Ontario healthcare settings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32349738
doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05087-8
pii: 10.1186/s12913-020-05087-8
pmc: PMC7189743
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
365Références
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Feb;174:104-112
pubmed: 28024239
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 9;12(8):e0178212
pubmed: 28793317
J Palliat Med. 2016 Jul;19(7):767-70
pubmed: 27104490
JAAPA. 2016 Jul;29(7):35-9
pubmed: 27351645
Inform Prim Care. 2011;19(1):33-7
pubmed: 22118334
Nurse Res. 2013 Mar;20(4):6-11
pubmed: 23520706
Implement Sci. 2014 Nov 19;9:165
pubmed: 25407138
JAMA. 2012 Jul 18;308(3):243-4
pubmed: 22797640
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2011 Apr;16(2):75-80
pubmed: 21389060
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 30;9(1):e027012
pubmed: 30700491
J Eval Clin Pract. 2016 Jun;22(3):395-402
pubmed: 26695837
Qual Health Res. 2005 May;15(5):669-85
pubmed: 15802542
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Mar 12;16:87
pubmed: 26968157
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Feb;18(1):202-8
pubmed: 22221420
Br J Nurs. 2005 Apr 14-27;14(7):405-8
pubmed: 15924018
Med J Aust. 2008 Feb 18;188(4):199-201
pubmed: 18279123
Disabil Rehabil. 2006 May 15;28(9):587-93
pubmed: 16690588
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 20;18(1):570
pubmed: 30029638
Healthc Manage Forum. 2016 Jan;29(1):33-8
pubmed: 26656392
Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581-629
pubmed: 15595944
Hum Resour Health. 2014 Dec 11;12:69
pubmed: 25495058
BMJ. 2001 Sep 15;323(7313):625-8
pubmed: 11557716
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2009 Summer;29(3):178-84
pubmed: 19728383
Implement Sci. 2016 Oct 19;11(1):141
pubmed: 27756414
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017 Dec;22(5):1085-1099
pubmed: 28116565