Visual Size Processing in Early Visual Cortex Follows Lateral Occipital Cortex Involvement.
TMS
objects' size information
visual processing
Journal
The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience
ISSN: 1529-2401
Titre abrégé: J Neurosci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8102140
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 05 2020
27 05 2020
Historique:
received:
13
10
2019
revised:
06
04
2020
accepted:
06
04
2020
pubmed:
1
5
2020
medline:
23
10
2020
entrez:
1
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Neural activation in the early visual cortex (EVC) reflects the perceived rather than retinal size of stimuli, suggesting that feedback possibly from extrastriate regions modulates retinal size information in EVC. Meanwhile, the lateral occipital cortex (LOC) has been suggested to be critically involved in object size processing. To test for the potential contributions of feedback modulations on size representations in EVC, we investigated the dynamics of relevant processes using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Specifically, we briefly disrupted the neural activity of EVC and LOC at early, intermediate, and late time windows while participants performed size judgment tasks in either an illusory or neutral context. TMS over EVC and LOC allowed determining whether these two brain regions are relevant for generating phenomenological size impressions. Furthermore, the temporal order of TMS effects allowed inferences on the dynamics of information exchange between the two areas. Particularly, if feedback signals from LOC to EVC are crucial for generating altered size representations in EVC, then TMS effects over EVC should be observed simultaneously or later than the effects following LOC stimulation. The data from 20 humans (13 females) revealed that TMS over both EVC and LOC impaired illusory size perception. However, the strongest effects of TMS applied over EVC occurred later than those of LOC, supporting a functionally relevant feedback modulation from LOC to EVC for scaling size information. Our results suggest that context integration and the concomitant change of perceived size require LOC and result in modulating representations in EVC via recurrent processing.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32350038
pii: JNEUROSCI.2437-19.2020
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2437-19.2020
pmc: PMC7252478
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4410-4417Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 the authors.
Références
Neuroimage. 2006 Sep;32(3):1308-16
pubmed: 16822682
Neuroimage. 2003 Aug;19(4):1567-77
pubmed: 12948712
Curr Biol. 2019 Jul 8;29(13):2237-2243.e4
pubmed: 31257140
Cortex. 2013 Jan;49(1):327-35
pubmed: 22503283
Curr Biol. 2014 Jul 21;24(14):1653-1658
pubmed: 25017208
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Apr;17(4):878-84
pubmed: 16707733
Trends Neurosci. 2000 Nov;23(11):571-9
pubmed: 11074267
Brain. 1999 Feb;122 ( Pt 2):339-50
pubmed: 10071061
Neuron. 2007 Oct 25;56(2):366-83
pubmed: 17964252
Nat Neurosci. 2012 Mar 11;15(4):540-2
pubmed: 22406550
PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e19712
pubmed: 21611188
Nat Neurosci. 2005 Feb;8(2):143-4
pubmed: 15643428
Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Aug 18;5:85
pubmed: 21887142
Vision Res. 2001;41(10-11):1409-22
pubmed: 11322983
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 Jan;57(1):73-8
pubmed: 8301309
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2001 Apr;107(1-3):209-28
pubmed: 11388136
Neuroimage. 2013 Apr 1;69:146-56
pubmed: 23201366
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989 Nov-Dec;74(6):458-62
pubmed: 2480226
Trends Neurosci. 2006 Jun;29(6):307-16
pubmed: 16713635
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Jul;26(7):1507-18
pubmed: 24392895
Neuroreport. 2002 May 24;13(7):965-8
pubmed: 12004200
Neuroreport. 2005 Sep 8;16(13):1483-7
pubmed: 16110276
J Neurosci. 2002 Jun 15;22(12):5055-73
pubmed: 12077201
J Neurosci. 2011 Feb 16;31(7):2488-92
pubmed: 21325516
J Neurosci. 2004 Aug 4;24(31):6898-903
pubmed: 15295024
Neuron. 2012 Jun 21;74(6):1114-24
pubmed: 22726840
Exp Brain Res. 2015 Dec;233(12):3535-41
pubmed: 26314755
Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2001 Oct;36(2-3):96-107
pubmed: 11690606
Curr Biol. 2008 Nov 11;18(21):1707-12
pubmed: 18993076
J Neurosci. 1995 Feb;15(2):1605-15
pubmed: 7869121
J Neurosci. 2016 Apr 27;36(17):4662-8
pubmed: 27122025
Nat Neurosci. 2006 Mar;9(3):429-34
pubmed: 16462737
Neuroreport. 2009 May 27;20(8):809-14
pubmed: 19384256
Cereb Cortex. 2019 Jan 1;29(1):17-26
pubmed: 29161359
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Aug;23(8):1987-97
pubmed: 20807050
Behav Res Methods. 2010 Aug;42(3):671-84
pubmed: 20805589
Cereb Cortex. 2010 Jul;20(7):1586-95
pubmed: 19875676
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Sep;45:295-304
pubmed: 25010557
Psychol Sci. 2013 Jan 1;24(1):63-71
pubmed: 23228938
Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 16;59(2):1608-14
pubmed: 21925610
Cereb Cortex. 2003 Aug;13(8):807-14
pubmed: 12853366
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Jun;22(6):1262-9
pubmed: 19413482