The Effect of Force-Field Parameters on Cytochrome P450-Membrane Interactions: Structure and Dynamics.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 04 2020
Historique:
received: 05 08 2019
accepted: 13 04 2020
entrez: 1 5 2020
pubmed: 1 5 2020
medline: 25 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The simulation of membrane proteins requires compatible protein and lipid force fields that reproduce the properties of both the protein and the lipid bilayer. Cytochrome P450 enzymes are bitopic membrane proteins with a transmembrane helical anchor and a large cytosolic globular domain that dips into the membrane. As such, they are representative and challenging examples of membrane proteins for simulations, displaying features of both peripheral and integral membrane proteins. We performed molecular dynamics simulations of three cytochrome P450 isoforms (2C9, 2C19 and 1A1) in a 2-oleoyl-1-palmitoyl-sn-glycerol-3-phosphocholine bilayer using two AMBER force field combinations: GAFF-LIPID with ff99SB for the protein, and LIPID14 with ff14SB for the protein. Comparison of the structural and dynamic properties of the proteins, the lipids and the protein-membrane interactions shows differing sensitivity of the cytochrome P450 isoforms to the choice of force field, with generally better agreement with experiment for the LIPID14 + ff14SB combination.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32350331
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64129-7
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-64129-7
pmc: PMC7190701
doi:

Substances chimiques

Lipid Bilayers 0
Membrane Lipids 0
Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System 9035-51-2

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

7284

Références

Lindahl, E. & Sansom, M. S. S. Membrane proteins: Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 18, 425–431 (2008).
pubmed: 18406600 doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2008.02.003
Fagerberg, L., Jonasson, K., Von Heijne, G., Uhlén, M. & Berglund, L. Prediction of the human membrane proteome. Proteomics 10, 1141–1149 (2010).
pubmed: 20175080 doi: 10.1002/pmic.200900258
Babcock, J. J. J. & Li, M. Deorphanizing the human transmembrane genome: A landscape of uncharacterized membrane proteins. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 35, 11–23 (2014).
pubmed: 24241348 doi: 10.1038/aps.2013.142
Danielson, P. B. & Danielson, P. B. B. S. P. The Cytochrome P450 Superfamily: Biochemistry, Evolution and Drug Metabolism in Humans. Curr. Drug Metab. 3, 561–597 (2005).
doi: 10.2174/1389200023337054
Monk, B. C. et al. Architecture of a single membrane spanning cytochrome P450 suggests constraints that orient the catalytic domain relative to a bilayer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3865–70 (2014).
pubmed: 24613931 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1324245111
Ozalp, C., Szczesna-Skorupa, E. & Kemper, B. Identification of membrane-contacting loops of the catalytic domain of cytochrome P450 2C2 by tryptophan fluorescence scanning. Biochemistry 45, 4629–4637 (2006).
pubmed: 16584198 doi: 10.1021/bi051372t
Williams, P. A., Cosme, J., Sridhar, V., Johnson, E. F. & McRee, D. E. Mammalian microsomal cytochrome P450 monooxygenase: structural adaptations for membrane binding and functional diversity. Mol. Cell 5, 121–131 (2000).
pubmed: 10678174 doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80408-6
Barnaba, C. & Ramamoorthy, A. Picturing the Membrane-assisted Choreography of Cytochrome P450 with Lipid Nanodiscs. ChemPhysChem 19, 2603–2613 (2018).
pubmed: 29995333 doi: 10.1002/cphc.201800444
Berka, K. et al. Behavior of human cytochromes P450 on lipid membranes. J. Phys. Chem. B 117, 11556–11564 (2013).
pubmed: 23987570 doi: 10.1021/jp4059559
Hackett, J. C. C. Membrane-embedded substrate recognition by cytochrome P450 3A4. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 4037–4046 (2018).
pubmed: 29382727 pmcid: 5857991 doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA117.000961
Baylon, J. L. L., Lenov, I. L. L., Sligar, S. G. G. & Tajkhorshid, E. Characterizing the membrane-bound state of cytochrome P450 3A4: Structure, depth of insertion, and orientation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 8542–8551 (2013).
pubmed: 23697766 pmcid: 3682445 doi: 10.1021/ja4003525
Park, J., Czapla, L. & Amaro, R. E. E. Molecular simulations of aromatase reveal new insights into the mechanism of ligand binding. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 53, 2047–2056 (2013).
pubmed: 23927370 pmcid: 3787069 doi: 10.1021/ci400225w
Lonsdale, R., Rouse, S. L., Sansom, M. S. & Mulholland, A. J. A Multiscale Approach to Modelling Drug Metabolism by Membrane-Bound Cytochrome P450 Enzymes. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003714 (2014).
pubmed: 25033460 pmcid: 4102395 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003714
Berka, K., Hendrychová, T., Anzenbacher, P. & Otyepka, M. Membrane position of ibuprofen agrees with suggested access path entrance to cytochrome P450 2C9 active site. J. Phys. Chem. A 115, 11248–55 (2011).
pubmed: 21744854 pmcid: 3257864 doi: 10.1021/jp204488j
Sgrignani, J. & Magistrato, A. Influence of the membrane lipophilic environment on the structure and on the substrate access/egress routes of the human aromatase enzyme. A computational study. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 52, 1595–1606 (2012).
pubmed: 22621202 doi: 10.1021/ci300151h
Cojocaru, V., Balali-Mood, K., Sansom, M. S. P. & Wade, R. C. Structure and dynamics of the membrane-bound cytochrome P450 2C9. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002152 (2011).
pubmed: 21852944 pmcid: 3154944 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002152
Yu, X. et al. Ligand tunnels in T. brucei and human CYP51: Insights for parasite-specific drug design. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1860, 67–78 (2015).
pubmed: 26493722 pmcid: 4689311 doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2015.10.015
Mustafa, G., Nandekar, P., Yu, X. & Wade, R. On the Application of the MARTINI Coarse-Grained Model to Immersion of a Protein in a Phospholipid Bilayer. J. Chem. Phys. 143, 243139 (2015).
pubmed: 26723624 doi: 10.1063/1.4936909
Yu, X. et al. Dynamics of CYP51: Implications for function and inhibitor design. J. Mol. Recognit. 28, 59–73 (2015).
pubmed: 25601796 pmcid: 4337246 doi: 10.1002/jmr.2412
Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: Visual Molecular Dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38 (1996).
pubmed: 8744570 doi: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5
Siu, S. W. I. W. I., Vácha, R., Jungwirth, P. & Böckmann, R. A. A. Biomolecular simulations of membranes: Physical properties from different force fields. J. Chem. Phys. 128, 125103 (2008).
pubmed: 18376978 doi: 10.1063/1.2897760
Pluhackova, K. et al. A Critical Comparison of Biomembrane Force Fields: Structure and Dynamics of Model DMPC, POPC, and POPE Bilayers. J. Phys. Chem. B 120, 3888–3903 (2016).
pubmed: 27035634 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b01870
Poger, D., Caron, B. & Mark, A. E. E. Validating lipid force fields against experimental data: Progress, challenges and perspectives. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Biomembr. 1858, 1556–1565 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2016.01.029
Piggot, T. J. J. et al. Molecular dynamics simulations of phosphatidylcholine membranes: A comparative force field study. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 4593–4609 (2012).
pubmed: 26605617 doi: 10.1021/ct3003157
Guvench, O. & MacKerell, A. D. D. Comparison of protein force fields for molecular dynamics simulations. In Methods in Molecular Biology 443, 63–88 (Humana Press, 2008).
Martín-García, F., Papaleo, E., Gomez-Puertas, P., Boomsma, W. & Lindorff-Larsen, K. Comparing molecular dynamics force fields in the essential subspace. PLoS One 10, e0121114 (2015).
pubmed: 25811178 pmcid: 4374674 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121114
Robustelli, P., Piana, S. & Shaw, D. E. E. Developing a molecular dynamics force field for both folded and disordered protein states. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, E4758–E4766 (2018).
pubmed: 29735687 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1800690115
Sakae, Y. & Okamoto, Y. Protein force-field parameters optimized with the protein data bank. II. Comparisons of force fields by folding simulations of short peptides. J. Theor. Comput. Chem. 3, 359–378 (2004).
doi: 10.1142/S0219633604001094
Sandoval-Perez, A., Pluhackova, K. & Böckmann, R. A. Critical Comparison of Biomembrane Force Fields: Protein-Lipid Interactions at the Membrane Interface. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 2310–2321 (2017).
pubmed: 28388089 doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00001
Jorgensen, W. L. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D. D., Impey, R. W. W. & Klein, M. L. L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926–935 (1983).
doi: 10.1063/1.445869
Harrach, M. F. F. & Drossel, B. Structure and dynamics of TIP3P, TIP4P, and TIP5P water near smooth and atomistic walls of different hydroaffinity. J. Chem. Phys. 140, 174501 (2014).
pubmed: 24811640 doi: 10.1063/1.4872239
Yu, X. et al. Dynathor: dynamics of the complex of cytochrome p450 and cytochrome P450 reductase in a phospholipid bilayer. in High Performance Computing in Science and Engineering 15 255–264 (Springer, 2016).
Kučerka, N., Nieh, M. P. & Katsaras, J. Fluid phase lipid areas and bilayer thicknesses of commonly used phosphatidylcholines as a function of temperature. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Biomembr. 1808, 2761–2771 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.07.022
Szczesna-Skorupa, E. & Kemper, B. Endoplasmic reticulum retention determinants in the transmembrane and linker domains of cytochrome P450 2C1. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 19409–19415 (2000).
pubmed: 10781599 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M002394200
Mustafa, G. et al. Influence of Transmembrane Helix Mutations on Cytochrome P450-Membrane Interactions and Function. Biophys. J. 116, 419–432 (2019).
pubmed: 30658838 pmcid: 6369400 doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.12.014
Yamamoto, K. et al. Probing the transmembrane structure and topology of microsomal cytochrome-P450 by solid-state NMR on temperature-resistant bicelles. Sci. Rep. 3, 2556 (2013).
pubmed: 23989972 pmcid: 3757361 doi: 10.1038/srep02556
Dickson, C. J. et al. Lipid14: The Amber Lipid Force Field. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10, 865–879 (2014).
pubmed: 24803855 pmcid: 3985482 doi: 10.1021/ct4010307
Turner, P. J. J. XMGRACE, Version 5.1. 19. Cent. Coast. land-margin Res. oregon Grad. Inst. Sci. Technol. Beaverton, Ore, USA (2005).
Cojocaru, V., Winn, P. J. & Wade, R. C. The ins and outs of cytochrome P450s. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1770, 390–401 (2007).
pubmed: 16920266 doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2006.07.005 pmcid: 16920266
Mustafa, G., Nandekar, P. P., Bruce, N. J. & Wade, R. C. Differing membrane interactions of two highly similar drug-metabolizing cytochrome P450 isoforms: CYP 2C9 and CYP 2C19. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 4328 (2019).
pmcid: 6770661 doi: 10.3390/ijms20184328 pubmed: 6770661
Kučerka, N., Tristram-Nagle, S. & Nagle, J. F. F. Structure of fully hydrated fluid phase lipid bilayers with monounsaturated chains. J. Membr. Biol. 208, 193–202 (2006).
doi: 10.1007/s00232-005-7006-8
Nagle, J. F. F. & Tristram-Nagle, S. Structure of lipid bilayers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Rev. Biomembr. 1469, 159–195 (2000).
doi: 10.1016/S0304-4157(00)00016-2
Leekumjorn, S. & Sum, A. K. K. Molecular characterization of gel and liquid-crystalline structures of fully hydrated POPC and POPE bilayers. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 6026–6033 (2007).
pubmed: 17488110 doi: 10.1021/jp0686339
Hyslop, P. A. A., Morel, B. & Sauerheber, R. D. D. Organization and Interaction of Cholesterol and Phosphatidylcholine in Model Bilayer Membranes. Biochemistry 29, 1025–1038 (1990).
pubmed: 2160270 doi: 10.1021/bi00456a027
Seelig, J., Waespe-Šarĉević, N. & Waespe-Sarcevic, N. Molecular Order in Cis and Trans Unsaturated Phospholipid Bilayers. Biochemistry 17, 3310–3315 (1978).
pubmed: 687586 doi: 10.1021/bi00609a021
Jójárt, B. & Martinek, T. A. Performance of the general amber force field in modeling aqueous POPC membrane bilayers. J. Comput. Chem. 28, 2051–2058 (2007).
pubmed: 17431937 doi: 10.1002/jcc.20748
Caracciolo, G., Pozzi, D. & Caminiti, R. Hydration effect on the structure of dioleoylphosphatidylcholine bilayers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 183901 (2007).
doi: 10.1063/1.2734470
Wiener, M. C. C., Suter, R. M. M. & Nagle, J. F. F. Structure of the fully hydrated gel phase of dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine. Biophys. J. 55, 315–325 (1989).
pubmed: 2713445 pmcid: 1330473 doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(89)82807-3
Sevcsik, E., Pabst, G., Jilek, A. & Lohner, K. How lipids influence the mode of action of membrane-active peptides. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Biomembr. 1768, 2586–2595 (2007).
doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.06.015
Gapsys, V., de Groot, B. L. L. & Briones, R. Computational analysis of local membrane properties. J. Comput. Aided. Mol. Des. 27, 845–858 (2013).
pubmed: 24150904 pmcid: 3882000 doi: 10.1007/s10822-013-9684-0
Park, J. W., Reed, J. R. & Backes, W. L. The Localization of Cytochrome P450s CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 into Different Lipid Microdomains Is Governed by Their N-terminal and Internal Protein Regions. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 29449–60 (2015).
pubmed: 26468279 pmcid: 4705947 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.687103
Park, J. W. W., Reed, J. R. R., Brignac-Huber, L. M. M. & Backes, W. L. L. Cytochrome P450 system proteins reside in different regions of the endoplasmic reticulum. Biochem. J. 464, 241–249 (2014).
pubmed: 25236845 pmcid: 4314108 doi: 10.1042/BJ20140787
Brignac-Huber, L. M., Park, J. W., Reed, J. R. & Backes, W. L. Cytochrome P450 organization and function are modulated by endoplasmic reticulum phospholipid heterogeneity. Drug Metab. Dispos. 44, 1859–1866 (2016).
pubmed: 27233287 pmcid: 5118634 doi: 10.1124/dmd.115.068981
Šrejber, M. et al. Membrane-attached mammalian cytochromes P450: An overview of the membrane’s effects on structure, drug binding, and interactions with redox partners. J. Inorg. Biochem. 183, 117–136 (2018).
pubmed: 29653695 doi: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2018.03.002
Barnaba, C. et al. Cytochrome-P450-induced ordering of microsomal membranes modulates affinity for drugs. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 57, 3391–3395 (2018).
doi: 10.1002/anie.201713167
Yamamoto, K., Caporini, M. A., Im, S.-C., Waskell, L. & Ramamoorthy, A. Transmembrane interactions of full-length mammalian bitopic cytochrome-P450-cytochrome-b 5 complex in lipid bilayers revealed by sensitivity-enhanced dynamic nuclear polarization solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Sci. Rep. 7, 4116 (2017).
pubmed: 28646173 pmcid: 5482851 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04219-1
Monticelli, L. et al. The MARTINI coarse-grained force field: extension to proteins. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 819–834 (2008).
pubmed: 26621095 doi: 10.1021/ct700324x
Walsh, A. A., Szklarz, G. D. & Scott, E. E. Human cytochrome P450 1A1 structure and utility in understanding drug and xenobiotic metabolism. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 12932–12943 (2013).
pubmed: 23508959 pmcid: 3642336 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.452953
Wester, M. R. et al. The structure of human cytochrome P450 2C9 complexed with flurbiprofen at 2.0-A resolution. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 35630–7 (2004).
pubmed: 15181000 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M405427200
Reynald, R. L., Sansen, S., Stout, C. D. & Johnson, E. F. Structural characterization of human cytochrome P450 2C19: active site differences between P450’s 2C8, 2C9 and 2C19. J. Biol. Chem. 1–22 (2012).
Maier, J. A. et al. ff14SB: improving the accuracy of protein side chain and backbone parameters from ff99SB. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 3696–3713 (2015).
pubmed: 26574453 pmcid: 4821407 doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00255
Phillips, J. C. et al. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem. 26, 1781–1802 (2005).
pubmed: 16222654 pmcid: 2486339 doi: 10.1002/jcc.20289
Joung, I. S. & Cheatham, T. E. III Determination of alkali and halide monovalent ion parameters for use in explicitly solvated biomolecular simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 9020–9041 (2008).
pubmed: 18593145 pmcid: 2652252 doi: 10.1021/jp8001614
Kabsch, W. & Sander, C. Protein Secondary Structure: Pattern Recognition of Hydrogen-Bonded and Geometrical Features. 22, 2577–2637 (1983).
Wassenaar, T. A., Pluhackova, K., Böckmann, R. A., Marrink, S. J. & Tieleman, D. P. Going backward: A flexible geometric approach to reverse transformation from coarse grained to atomistic models. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10, 676–690 (2014).
pubmed: 26580045 doi: 10.1021/ct400617g
Harris, D. L., Park, J.-Y., Gruenke, L. & Waskell, L. Theoretical study of the ligand-CYP2B4 complexes: effect of structure on binding free energies and heme spin state. Proteins 55, 895–914 (2004).
pubmed: 15146488 doi: 10.1002/prot.20062
Ryckaert, J.-P. P., Ciccotti, G. & Berendsen, H. J. C. J. C. Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J. Comput. Phys. 23, 327–341 (1977).
doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(77)90098-5
Mori, T., Ogushi, F. & Sugita, Y. Analysis of lipid surface area in protein-membrane systems combining voronoi tessellation and monte carlo integration methods. J. Comput. Chem. 33, 286–293 (2012).
pubmed: 22102317 doi: 10.1002/jcc.21973
Roe, D. R. & Cheatham, T. E. III PTRAJ and CPPTRAJ: software for processing and analysis of molecular dynamics trajectory data. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 3084–3095 (2013).
pubmed: 26583988 doi: 10.1021/ct400341p
Guixa-González, R. et al. MEMBPLUGIN: Studying membrane complexity in VMD. Bioinformatics 30, 1478–1480 (2014).
pubmed: 24451625 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu037
Racine, J. Gnuplot 4.0: A Portable Interactive Plotting Utility. J. Appl. Econom. 21, 133–141 (2006).
doi: 10.1002/jae.885

Auteurs

Ghulam Mustafa (G)

Molecular and Cellular Modeling Group, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS), Heidelberg, Germany.
B-Zell-Immunologie (D130), German Cancer Research Center, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKF), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

Prajwal P Nandekar (PP)

Molecular and Cellular Modeling Group, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS), Heidelberg, Germany.
Zentrum für Molekulare Biologie der Universität Heidelberg, DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, INF 282, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Schrodinger Inc. #147, 3rd Floor, Jawaharlal Nehru main road, Above State Bank of India, Channasandra, 5th Stage, RR Nagar, Bengaluru, 560098, India.

Goutam Mukherjee (G)

Molecular and Cellular Modeling Group, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS), Heidelberg, Germany.
Zentrum für Molekulare Biologie der Universität Heidelberg, DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, INF 282, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

Neil J Bruce (NJ)

Molecular and Cellular Modeling Group, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS), Heidelberg, Germany.

Rebecca C Wade (RC)

Molecular and Cellular Modeling Group, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS), Heidelberg, Germany. rebecca.wade@h-its.org.
Zentrum für Molekulare Biologie der Universität Heidelberg, DKFZ-ZMBH Alliance, INF 282, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. rebecca.wade@h-its.org.
Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing (IWR), Heidelberg University, INF 368, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. rebecca.wade@h-its.org.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH