"Pick up anything that moves": a qualitative analysis of a police crackdown against people who use drugs in Tijuana, Mexico.
Crackdown
Drug law enforcement
Involuntary drug treatment referral
Mexico
People who use drugs
Police officers
Journal
Health & justice
ISSN: 2194-7899
Titre abrégé: Health Justice
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101626355
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Apr 2020
29 Apr 2020
Historique:
received:
13
09
2019
accepted:
24
03
2020
entrez:
1
5
2020
pubmed:
1
5
2020
medline:
1
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Homeless people who use drugs (PWUD) are often displaced, detained, and/or forced into drug treatment during police crackdowns. Such operations follow a zero-tolerance approach to law enforcement and have a deleterious impact on the health of PWUD. In Mexico, municipal police officers (MPOs) conducted the largest crackdown documented at the Tijuana River Canal (Tijuana Mejora) to dismantle an open drug market. We analyzed active-duty MPOs' attitudes on the rationale, implementation, and outcomes of the crackdown. We also included the involvement of non-governmental allies in the disguised imprisonment as drug treatment referral and potential legal consequences of having illegally detained PWUD. Between February-June 2016, 20 semi-structured interviews were conducted with MPOs in Tijuana. Interviews were transcribed, translated and coded using a consensus-based approach. Emergent themes, trends and frameworks were analyzed through a hermeneutic grounded theory protocol. Participants recognized the limitations of Tijuana Mejora in effectively controlling crime and addressing drug treatment solutions. MPOs perceived that the intent of the operation was to displace and detain homeless PWUD, not to assist or rehabilitate them. The police operation was largely justified as a public safety measure to reduce the risk of injury due to flooding, decrease drug consumption among PWUD and protect local tourism from PWUD. Some participants perceived the crackdown as a successful public health and safety measure while others highlighted occupational risks to MPOs and potential human rights violations of PWUD. Tijuana Mejora illustrated why public and private actors align in enforcing zero-tolerance drug policy. Perceptions of care are often based on captivity of the diseased, not in health and well-being of PWUD. Officer perceptions shed light on the many limitations of this punitive policing tool in this context. A shift towards evidence-based municipal strategies to address drug use, wherein police are perceived as partners in harm reduction rather than antagonists, is warranted.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Homeless people who use drugs (PWUD) are often displaced, detained, and/or forced into drug treatment during police crackdowns. Such operations follow a zero-tolerance approach to law enforcement and have a deleterious impact on the health of PWUD. In Mexico, municipal police officers (MPOs) conducted the largest crackdown documented at the Tijuana River Canal (Tijuana Mejora) to dismantle an open drug market. We analyzed active-duty MPOs' attitudes on the rationale, implementation, and outcomes of the crackdown. We also included the involvement of non-governmental allies in the disguised imprisonment as drug treatment referral and potential legal consequences of having illegally detained PWUD.
METHODS
METHODS
Between February-June 2016, 20 semi-structured interviews were conducted with MPOs in Tijuana. Interviews were transcribed, translated and coded using a consensus-based approach. Emergent themes, trends and frameworks were analyzed through a hermeneutic grounded theory protocol.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Participants recognized the limitations of Tijuana Mejora in effectively controlling crime and addressing drug treatment solutions. MPOs perceived that the intent of the operation was to displace and detain homeless PWUD, not to assist or rehabilitate them. The police operation was largely justified as a public safety measure to reduce the risk of injury due to flooding, decrease drug consumption among PWUD and protect local tourism from PWUD. Some participants perceived the crackdown as a successful public health and safety measure while others highlighted occupational risks to MPOs and potential human rights violations of PWUD.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Tijuana Mejora illustrated why public and private actors align in enforcing zero-tolerance drug policy. Perceptions of care are often based on captivity of the diseased, not in health and well-being of PWUD. Officer perceptions shed light on the many limitations of this punitive policing tool in this context. A shift towards evidence-based municipal strategies to address drug use, wherein police are perceived as partners in harm reduction rather than antagonists, is warranted.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32350636
doi: 10.1186/s40352-020-00111-9
pii: 10.1186/s40352-020-00111-9
pmc: PMC7191752
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
9Subventions
Organisme : Center for AIDS Research, University of California, San Diego
ID : 5P30AI036214
Organisme : FIC NIH HHS
ID : D43TW008633, R25TW009343, K01DA043421
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : R01DA039073
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : P30 AI036214
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : T32 DA023356
Pays : United States
Organisme : Open Society Foundations
ID : OR2013-11352, OR2014-18327
Organisme : FIC NIH HHS
ID : T32DA023356
Pays : United States
Références
Demography. 2018 Feb;55(1):319-340
pubmed: 29344926
Subst Use Misuse. 2012 Feb;47(3):244-53
pubmed: 22136446
Subst Use Misuse. 2017 Jan 28;52(2):214-222
pubmed: 27767367
Harm Reduct J. 2011 Apr 08;8:7
pubmed: 21477299
Med Anthropol. 2020 Feb-Mar;39(2):139-152
pubmed: 31099592
Ann Assoc Am Geogr. 2012;102(5):1190-1199
pubmed: 23606753
Int J Drug Policy. 2018 Apr;54:114-122
pubmed: 29414483
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 28;375(4):357-68
pubmed: 27464203
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2018 Jan-Mar;50(1):62-71
pubmed: 28960166
J Urban Health. 2013 Apr;90(2):284-98
pubmed: 22806453
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Mar;41:132-139
pubmed: 28111221
JAMA. 2012 Nov 14;308(18):1863-4
pubmed: 23150005
Soc Sci Med. 2005 Aug;61(3):673-84
pubmed: 15899325
Can J Public Health. 2003 Sep-Oct;94(5):355-9
pubmed: 14577743
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2015 Sep;76(5):758-63
pubmed: 26402356
Subst Use Misuse. 2012 Mar;47(4):364-74
pubmed: 22216907
J Urban Health. 2013 Dec;90(6):1102-11
pubmed: 23900788
CMAJ. 2004 May 11;170(10):1551-6
pubmed: 15136548
BMJ Open. 2015 Aug 10;5(8):e008958
pubmed: 26260350