Using Multilevel Mediation Model to Measure the Contribution of Beliefs to Judgments of Learning.
beliefs
judgments of learning
metamemory
multilevel linear model
multilevel mediation model
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
23
12
2019
accepted:
17
03
2020
entrez:
1
5
2020
pubmed:
1
5
2020
medline:
1
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Recent studies on judgments of learning (JOLs) suggest that beliefs play an important role in the formation of JOLs. The current article introduces a multilevel mediation model to quantify the contribution of beliefs to JOL formation when both JOLs and global belief-based predictions are measured from the same group of participants. Our examples of fitting the multilevel mediation model to hypothetical and published datasets revealed that it is feasible to use the multilevel mediation model to examine the mediation effect of beliefs on the relationship between a cue and JOLs, and quantitatively compare the effects of beliefs and processing fluency on JOLs in one model. Then we compared the current multilevel mediation model and the multilevel moderation model implemented in previous studies, and discussed their similarities and differences. Finally, a data simulation was performed to explain the inflation of Type I error for the multilevel mediation model when we regress global belief-based predictions on the cue, and suggestions about appropriate steps for conducting multilevel mediation analysis are proposed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32351423
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00637
pmc: PMC7174663
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
637Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Hu, Zheng, Fan, Su, Yang and Luo.
Références
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Feb;14(1):107-11
pubmed: 17546739
Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:417-44
pubmed: 23020639
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb;15(1):174-9
pubmed: 18605499
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82
pubmed: 3806354
Mem Cognit. 2015 Feb;43(2):180-92
pubmed: 25326151
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jun;22(6):787-94
pubmed: 21551341
J Mem Lang. 2014 Aug 1;75:181-198
pubmed: 25067885
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Jan;29(1):22-34
pubmed: 12549580
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Jul;43(7):1073-1092
pubmed: 28114778
Psychol Methods. 2006 Jun;11(2):142-63
pubmed: 16784335
Mem Cognit. 2008 Mar;36(2):429-37
pubmed: 18426071
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Dec;133(4):643-56
pubmed: 15584811
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(4):781-99
pubmed: 26059683
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Sep;37(5):1264-9
pubmed: 21574748
Psychol Methods. 2010 Sep;15(3):209-33
pubmed: 20822249
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3):
pubmed: 24403724
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 20;13(7):e0200888
pubmed: 30028846
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 Nov;137(4):615-25
pubmed: 18999356
Mem Cognit. 2019 Aug;47(6):1102-1119
pubmed: 30859406
Mem Cognit. 2013 Oct;41(7):1000-11
pubmed: 23661189
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 10;10(11):e0142351
pubmed: 26556478
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 May;43(5):680-693
pubmed: 27709983
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Mar;24(3):127-35
pubmed: 19185386
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Nov;138(4):449-68
pubmed: 19883130
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Oct;50(5):2125-2143
pubmed: 29247385
Memory. 2017 Feb;25(2):244-253
pubmed: 26957039
Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 06;6:1995
pubmed: 26779097
Mem Cognit. 2017 May;45(4):639-650
pubmed: 27987115
Mem Cognit. 2015 May;43(4):647-58
pubmed: 25388520
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Apr;20(2):378-84
pubmed: 23188739