Aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the prevention of dementia.


Journal

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
ISSN: 1469-493X
Titre abrégé: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100909747

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 04 2020
Historique:
entrez: 1 5 2020
pubmed: 1 5 2020
medline: 1 9 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Dementia is a worldwide concern. Its global prevalence is increasing. At present, there is no medication licensed to prevent or delay the onset of dementia. Inflammation has been suggested as a key factor in dementia pathogenesis. Therefore, medications with anti-inflammatory properties could be beneficial for dementia prevention. To evaluate the effectiveness and adverse effects of aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for the primary or secondary prevention of dementia. We searched ALOIS, the specialised register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group up to 9 January 2020. ALOIS contains records of clinical trials identified from monthly searches of several major healthcare databases, trial registries and grey literature sources. We ran additional searches across MEDLINE (OvidSP), Embase (OvidSP) and six other databases to ensure that the searches were as comprehensive and up-to-date as possible. We also reviewed citations of reference lists of included studies. We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing aspirin or other NSAIDs with placebo for the primary or secondary prevention of dementia. We included trials with cognitively healthy participants (primary prevention) or participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or cognitive complaints (secondary prevention). We used standard methodological procedures according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We rated the strength of evidence for each outcome using the GRADE approach. We included four RCTs with 23,187 participants. Because of the diversity of these trials, we did not combine data to give summary estimates, but presented a narrative description of the evidence. We identified one trial (19,114 participants) comparing low-dose aspirin (100 mg once daily) to placebo. Participants were aged 70 years or older with no history of dementia, cardiovascular disease or physical disability. Interim analysis indicated no significant treatment effect and the trial was terminated slightly early after a median of 4.7 years' follow-up. There was no evidence of a difference in incidence of dementia between aspirin and placebo groups (risk ratio (RR) 0.98, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.15; high-certainty evidence). Participants allocated aspirin had higher rates of major bleeding (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.60, high-certainty evidence) and slightly higher mortality (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.28; high-certainty evidence). There was no evidence of a difference in activities of daily living between groups (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.02; high-certainty evidence). We identified three trials comparing non-aspirin NSAIDs to placebo. All three trials were terminated early due to adverse events associated with NSAIDs reported in other trials. One trial (2528 participants) investigated the cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor celecoxib (200 mg twice daily) and the non-selective NSAID naproxen (220 mg twice daily) for preventing dementia in cognitively healthy older adults with a family history of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Median follow-up was 734 days. Combining both NSAID treatment arms, there was no evidence of a difference in the incidence of AD between participants allocated NSAIDs and those allocated placebo (RR 1.91, 95% CI 0.89 to 4.10; moderate-certainty evidence). There was also no evidence of a difference in rates of myocardial infarction (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.61 to 2.40), stroke (RR 1.82, 95% CI 0.76 to 4.37) or mortality (RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.78 to 2.43) between treatment groups (all moderate-certainty evidence). One trial (88 participants) assessed the effectiveness of celecoxib (200 mg or 400 mg daily) in delaying cognitive decline in participants aged 40 to 81 years with mild age-related memory loss but normal memory performance scores. Mean duration of follow-up was 17.6 months in the celecoxib group and 18.1 months in the placebo group. There was no evidence of a difference between groups in test scores in any of six cognitive domains. Participants allocated celecoxib experienced more gastrointestinal adverse events than those allocated placebo (RR 2.66, 95% CI 1.05 to 6.75; low-certainty evidence). One trial (1457 participants) assessed the effectiveness of the COX-2 inhibitor rofecoxib (25 mg once daily) in delaying or preventing a diagnosis of AD in participants with MCI. Median duration of study participation was 115 weeks in the rofecoxib group and 130 weeks in the placebo group. There was a higher incidence of AD in the rofecoxib than the placebo group (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.72; moderate-certainty evidence). There was no evidence of a difference between groups in cardiovascular adverse events (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.66; moderate-certainty evidence) or mortality (RR 1.62, 95% CI 0.85 to 3.05; moderate-certainty evidence). Participants allocated rofecoxib had more upper gastrointestinal adverse events (RR 3.53, 95% CI 1.17 to 10.68; moderate-certainty evidence). Reported annual mean difference scores showed no evidence of a difference between groups in activities of daily living (year 1: no data available; year 2: 0.0, 95% CI -0.1 to 0.2; year 3: 0.1, 95% CI -0.1 to 0.3; year 4: 0.1, 95% CI -0.1 to 0.4; moderate-certainty evidence). There is no evidence to support the use of low-dose aspirin or other NSAIDs of any class (celecoxib, rofecoxib or naproxen) for the prevention of dementia, but there was evidence of harm. Although there were limitations in the available evidence, it seems unlikely that there is any need for further trials of low-dose aspirin for dementia prevention. If future studies of NSAIDs for dementia prevention are planned, they will need to be cognisant of the safety concerns arising from the existing studies.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Dementia is a worldwide concern. Its global prevalence is increasing. At present, there is no medication licensed to prevent or delay the onset of dementia. Inflammation has been suggested as a key factor in dementia pathogenesis. Therefore, medications with anti-inflammatory properties could be beneficial for dementia prevention.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the effectiveness and adverse effects of aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for the primary or secondary prevention of dementia.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched ALOIS, the specialised register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group up to 9 January 2020. ALOIS contains records of clinical trials identified from monthly searches of several major healthcare databases, trial registries and grey literature sources. We ran additional searches across MEDLINE (OvidSP), Embase (OvidSP) and six other databases to ensure that the searches were as comprehensive and up-to-date as possible. We also reviewed citations of reference lists of included studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing aspirin or other NSAIDs with placebo for the primary or secondary prevention of dementia. We included trials with cognitively healthy participants (primary prevention) or participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or cognitive complaints (secondary prevention).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methodological procedures according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We rated the strength of evidence for each outcome using the GRADE approach.
MAIN RESULTS
We included four RCTs with 23,187 participants. Because of the diversity of these trials, we did not combine data to give summary estimates, but presented a narrative description of the evidence. We identified one trial (19,114 participants) comparing low-dose aspirin (100 mg once daily) to placebo. Participants were aged 70 years or older with no history of dementia, cardiovascular disease or physical disability. Interim analysis indicated no significant treatment effect and the trial was terminated slightly early after a median of 4.7 years' follow-up. There was no evidence of a difference in incidence of dementia between aspirin and placebo groups (risk ratio (RR) 0.98, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.15; high-certainty evidence). Participants allocated aspirin had higher rates of major bleeding (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.60, high-certainty evidence) and slightly higher mortality (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.28; high-certainty evidence). There was no evidence of a difference in activities of daily living between groups (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.02; high-certainty evidence). We identified three trials comparing non-aspirin NSAIDs to placebo. All three trials were terminated early due to adverse events associated with NSAIDs reported in other trials. One trial (2528 participants) investigated the cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor celecoxib (200 mg twice daily) and the non-selective NSAID naproxen (220 mg twice daily) for preventing dementia in cognitively healthy older adults with a family history of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Median follow-up was 734 days. Combining both NSAID treatment arms, there was no evidence of a difference in the incidence of AD between participants allocated NSAIDs and those allocated placebo (RR 1.91, 95% CI 0.89 to 4.10; moderate-certainty evidence). There was also no evidence of a difference in rates of myocardial infarction (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.61 to 2.40), stroke (RR 1.82, 95% CI 0.76 to 4.37) or mortality (RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.78 to 2.43) between treatment groups (all moderate-certainty evidence). One trial (88 participants) assessed the effectiveness of celecoxib (200 mg or 400 mg daily) in delaying cognitive decline in participants aged 40 to 81 years with mild age-related memory loss but normal memory performance scores. Mean duration of follow-up was 17.6 months in the celecoxib group and 18.1 months in the placebo group. There was no evidence of a difference between groups in test scores in any of six cognitive domains. Participants allocated celecoxib experienced more gastrointestinal adverse events than those allocated placebo (RR 2.66, 95% CI 1.05 to 6.75; low-certainty evidence). One trial (1457 participants) assessed the effectiveness of the COX-2 inhibitor rofecoxib (25 mg once daily) in delaying or preventing a diagnosis of AD in participants with MCI. Median duration of study participation was 115 weeks in the rofecoxib group and 130 weeks in the placebo group. There was a higher incidence of AD in the rofecoxib than the placebo group (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.72; moderate-certainty evidence). There was no evidence of a difference between groups in cardiovascular adverse events (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.66; moderate-certainty evidence) or mortality (RR 1.62, 95% CI 0.85 to 3.05; moderate-certainty evidence). Participants allocated rofecoxib had more upper gastrointestinal adverse events (RR 3.53, 95% CI 1.17 to 10.68; moderate-certainty evidence). Reported annual mean difference scores showed no evidence of a difference between groups in activities of daily living (year 1: no data available; year 2: 0.0, 95% CI -0.1 to 0.2; year 3: 0.1, 95% CI -0.1 to 0.3; year 4: 0.1, 95% CI -0.1 to 0.4; moderate-certainty evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There is no evidence to support the use of low-dose aspirin or other NSAIDs of any class (celecoxib, rofecoxib or naproxen) for the prevention of dementia, but there was evidence of harm. Although there were limitations in the available evidence, it seems unlikely that there is any need for further trials of low-dose aspirin for dementia prevention. If future studies of NSAIDs for dementia prevention are planned, they will need to be cognisant of the safety concerns arising from the existing studies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32352165
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011459.pub2
pmc: PMC7192366
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal 0
Cyclooxygenase 2 Inhibitors 0
Lactones 0
Sulfones 0
rofecoxib 0QTW8Z7MCR
Naproxen 57Y76R9ATQ
Celecoxib JCX84Q7J1L
Aspirin R16CO5Y76E

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

CD011459

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Références

J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;44(2):385-96
pubmed: 25227314
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2012 Aug;27(5):296-300
pubmed: 22815077
Neurology. 1997 Mar;48(3):626-32
pubmed: 9065537
N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 22;345(21):1515-21
pubmed: 11794217
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;(2):CD006378
pubmed: 22336816
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 30;4:CD011459
pubmed: 32352165
Neurology. 2010 Sep 28;75(13):1203-10
pubmed: 20811000
Stroke. 2013 Feb;44(2):356-61
pubmed: 23321452
Ann Neurol. 2013 May;73(5):584-93
pubmed: 23495089
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2018 Sep 06;4:575-590
pubmed: 30406177
Neurology. 2009 Jun 2;72(22):1899-905
pubmed: 19386997
Neuroepidemiology. 2004 Jul-Aug;23(4):159-69
pubmed: 15279021
N Engl J Med. 2018 Oct 18;379(16):1519-1528
pubmed: 30221595
Biochemistry. 2013 May 14;52(19):3197-216
pubmed: 23614767
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2008 Jan-Mar;22(1):21-9
pubmed: 18317243
Neurobiol Aging. 2003 Jul-Aug;24(4):583-8
pubmed: 12714115
Neurology. 2008 Jan 1;70(1):17-24
pubmed: 18003940
Psychopharmacol Bull. 1988;24(4):641-52
pubmed: 3249766
BMJ. 2007 May 12;334(7601):987
pubmed: 17468120
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(4):CD001296
pubmed: 11034710
PLoS Clin Trials. 2006 Nov 17;1(7):e33
pubmed: 17111043
Drugs Aging. 2000 Jul;17(1):1-11
pubmed: 10933512
Trials. 2007 Jun 07;8:16
pubmed: 17555582
Lancet Neurol. 2013 Feb;12(2):207-16
pubmed: 23332364
Cortex. 2007 Jul;43(5):635-50
pubmed: 17715798
Cureus. 2017 Apr 8;9(4):e1144
pubmed: 28491485
Lancet Neurol. 2011 Sep;10(9):819-28
pubmed: 21775213
Biochem Pharmacol. 2014 Apr 15;88(4):565-72
pubmed: 24434190
Br J Psychiatry. 2006 May;188:460-4
pubmed: 16648533
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1994 Jul;38(1):45-51
pubmed: 7946936
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 1996 Jul-Aug;23(1):71-9
pubmed: 15374168
Gerontologist. 1970 Spring;10(1):20-30
pubmed: 5420677
Biol Psychiatry. 1979 Oct;14(5):791-801
pubmed: 497304
Gac Med Mex. 2008 Nov-Dec;144(6):497-502
pubmed: 19112722
BMJ. 2003 Jul 19;327(7407):128
pubmed: 12869452
Lancet. 1999 Jan 23;353(9149):307-14
pubmed: 9929039
Neurology. 1996 Aug;47(2):425-32
pubmed: 8757015
BMJ Open. 2012 Oct 03;2(5):
pubmed: 23035037
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1993 Jul;54(1):84-9
pubmed: 8330469
Neurol Clin. 2007 Aug;25(3):717-40, vi
pubmed: 17659187
Psychogeriatrics. 2011 Sep;11(3):131-4
pubmed: 21951952
Rheumatol Int. 2012 Jun;32(6):1491-502
pubmed: 22193214
Age Ageing. 2005 Mar;34(2):130-5
pubmed: 15713856
J Psychiatr Res. 1982-1983;17(1):37-49
pubmed: 7183759
Neurology. 2008 Jun 3;70(23):2219-25
pubmed: 18519870
J Intern Med. 2003 Jul;254(1):67-75
pubmed: 12823643
Neurology. 1984 Jul;34(7):939-44
pubmed: 6610841
BMJ. 2013 Dec 19;347:f7051
pubmed: 24355614
Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1995 Sep;21(2):195-218
pubmed: 8866675
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 17;352(11):1071-80
pubmed: 15713944
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;22(10):1031-6
pubmed: 17380488
Clin Drug Investig. 2013 Mar;33(3):167-83
pubmed: 23338974
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;16(12):999-1009
pubmed: 19038899
Neurology. 2007 May 22;68(21):1800-8
pubmed: 17460158
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1996 Spring;10(1):31-9
pubmed: 8919494
Alzheimers Dement. 2015 Feb;11(2):216-25.e1
pubmed: 25022541
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 04;11(8):e0160046
pubmed: 27490468
Gerontology. 1992;38(5):275-9
pubmed: 1427126
Neurobiol Aging. 1988 Jul-Aug;9(4):339-49
pubmed: 3263583
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003 May;18(5):425-31
pubmed: 12766920
Stroke. 2007 Jun;38(6):1949-51
pubmed: 17510457
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2015 Mar 24;7(1):33
pubmed: 25802557
Am J Med. 1998 Mar 30;104(3A):2S-8S; discussion 21S-22S
pubmed: 9572314
Neurology. 2007 Jul 17;69(3):275-82
pubmed: 17636065
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2005 Jun;30(6):1204-15
pubmed: 15742005
Nat New Biol. 1971 Jun 23;231(25):232-5
pubmed: 5284360
Arch Neurol. 2000 Nov;57(11):1586-91
pubmed: 11074790
J Clin Psychiatry. 1987 Aug;48(8):314-8
pubmed: 3611032
J Alzheimers Dis. 2006;9(3 Suppl):61-70
pubmed: 16914845
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2009 Jul-Sep;23(3):285-90
pubmed: 19812472
Maturitas. 2012 Jul;72(3):203-5
pubmed: 22607813
BMJ. 2008 Sep 01;337:a1198
pubmed: 18762476
J Stroke. 2014 Jan;16(1):18-26
pubmed: 24741561
Maturitas. 2014 Oct;79(2):196-201
pubmed: 24954700
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1989 Dec;11(6):855-70
pubmed: 2592527
Stroke. 2013 Feb;44(2):432-6
pubmed: 23306328
Am J Public Health. 1998 Sep;88(9):1337-42
pubmed: 9736873
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 17;352(11):1092-102
pubmed: 15713943
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Oct;1207:155-62
pubmed: 20955439

Auteurs

Fionnuala Jordan (F)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Terry J Quinn (TJ)

Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Bernadette McGuinness (B)

Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.

Peter Passmore (P)

Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.

John P Kelly (JP)

Pharmacology and Therapeutics, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Catrin Tudur Smith (C)

Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Kathy Murphy (K)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Declan Devane (D)

School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH