Efficacy of Nivolumab and AVD in Early-Stage Unfavorable Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma: The Randomized Phase 2 German Hodgkin Study Group NIVAHL Trial.
Adolescent
Adult
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ adverse effects
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ adverse effects
Dacarbazine
/ adverse effects
Doxorubicin
/ adverse effects
Female
Germany
Hodgkin Disease
/ drug therapy
Humans
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
/ adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Nivolumab
/ adverse effects
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Progression-Free Survival
Remission Induction
Vinblastine
/ adverse effects
Young Adult
Journal
JAMA oncology
ISSN: 2374-2445
Titre abrégé: JAMA Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101652861
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 06 2020
01 06 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
1
5
2020
medline:
23
1
2021
entrez:
1
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In early-stage unfavorable classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), conventional therapy induces high cure rates but also relevant acute and long-term toxic effects. Nivolumab is well tolerated and highly effective in relapsed/refractory cHL but has not been adequately studied in first-line treatment of early-stage cHL. The NIVAHL trial evaluated nivolumab in this setting with the aim to develop a highly effective yet tolerable systemic therapy to ultimately mitigate morbidity in patients who survive cHL. To evaluate efficacy of 2 experimental nivolumab-based first-line treatment strategies in patients with early-stage unfavorable cHL. This was an open-label, multicenter, phase 2 randomized clinical trial, open between April 2017 and October 2018. The trial took place at 35 trial centers across Germany, ranging from academic centers to private offices. Eligibility was defined by age 18 to 60 years, cHL confirmed by expert pathology review, early-stage unfavorable disease by German Hodgkin Study Group criteria (stage I to II with risk factor[s]), and absence of serious concomitant disease or organ dysfunction. Among 110 enrolled patients, 109 were eligible. Systemic therapy, per random assignment (1:1) to either concomitant treatment with 4 cycles of nivolumab and doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (N-AVD) or sequential treatment with 4 doses of nivolumab, 2 cycles of N-AVD, and 2 cycles of AVD at standard doses, followed by 30-Gy involved-site radiotherapy. Complete remission (CR) rate after study treatment, aiming at excluding a CR rate of 80% or lower via a 2-sided 95% CI for each treatment group. Of 109 patients included in this study, 65 (59.6%) were women, and the median (range) age was 27 (18-60) years. At interim staging after 2 cycles of N-AVD or 4 doses of nivolumab monotherapy, 54 of 54 (100%) and 49 of 51 (96%) response-eligible patients, respectively, achieved an objective response, with CR in 47 (87%) and 26 (51%) patients, respectively. Among 101 patients eligible for primary end point analysis, 46 of 51 (90%; 95% CI, 79%-97%) patients receiving concomitant therapy and 47 of 50 (94%; 95% CI, 84%-99%) patients receiving sequential therapy achieved CR after study treatment. With a median follow-up of 13 months, 12-month progression-free survival was 100% for patients receiving concomitant treatment and 98% (95% CI, 95%-100%) for patients receiving sequential therapy. Both strategies combining nivolumab and AVD are feasible and resulted in high remission rates. Despite narrowly missing the efficacy benchmark in the concomitant group, the excellent 12-month progression-free survival and the unexpectedly high CR rate after 4 doses of nivolumab monotherapy warrant further evaluation of this approach in the first-line treatment of patients with early-stage cHL. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03004833.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32352505
pii: 2765292
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0750
pmc: PMC7193521
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
0
PDCD1 protein, human
0
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
0
Nivolumab
31YO63LBSN
Vinblastine
5V9KLZ54CY
Dacarbazine
7GR28W0FJI
Doxorubicin
80168379AG
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03004833']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
872-880Références
J Clin Oncol. 2018 May 10;36(14):1428-1439
pubmed: 29584546
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Sep;17(9):1283-94
pubmed: 27451390
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Aug 10;37(23):1997-2007
pubmed: 31112476
Blood. 2016 Nov 24;128(21):2489-2496
pubmed: 27574190
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Mar 20;30(9):907-13
pubmed: 22271480
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Oct;17(10):1453-1462
pubmed: 27612583
Leuk Lymphoma. 2019 Jun;60(6):1389-1398
pubmed: 30507313
N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 24;373(26):2499-511
pubmed: 26699166
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Mar;18(3):e143-e152
pubmed: 28271869
Cancer Immunol Res. 2016 Nov;4(11):895-902
pubmed: 27803050
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Sep;17(9):1325-34
pubmed: 27470081
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug 10;34(23):2690-7
pubmed: 27069084
Blood. 2019 Oct 3;134(14):1144-1153
pubmed: 31409671
Ann Oncol. 2012 Jul;23(7):1818-25
pubmed: 22228451
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Mar 15;18(6):1611-8
pubmed: 22271878
Ann Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;29(Suppl 4):iv19-iv29
pubmed: 29796651
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;35(16):1786-1794
pubmed: 28291393
Blood. 2017 Nov 30;130(22):2420-2430
pubmed: 28893733
Br J Haematol. 2018 Jun;181(6):837-840
pubmed: 28439879
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec 20;37(36):3528-3537
pubmed: 31622132
Blood. 2018 Apr 19;131(16):1809-1819
pubmed: 29449276
Blood. 2016 Sep 15;128(11):1458-64
pubmed: 27458003
Lancet. 2015 Apr 11;385(9976):1418-27
pubmed: 25539730
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 20;35(18):1999-2007
pubmed: 28418763