Limited evidence for common interannual trends in Baltic Sea summer phytoplankton biomass.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
21
05
2019
accepted:
31
03
2020
entrez:
1
5
2020
pubmed:
1
5
2020
medline:
15
7
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Baltic Sea summer phytoplankton community plays an important role in biogeochemical cycling and in the transfer of energy through the food web via zooplankton. We aimed to improve the understanding of the degree to which large-scale versus local environmental dynamics regulate phytoplankton dynamics by analyzing time series at the Baltic Sea scale. We used dynamic factor analysis to study if there are common patterns of interannual variation that are shared ("common trends") among summer phytoplankton total and class-level biomass time series observed across Baltic Sea latitudinal gradients in salinity and temperature. We evaluated alternative hypotheses regarding common trends among summer phytoplankton biomass: Baltic Sea-wide common trends; common trends by geography (latitude and basin); common trends differing among functional groups (phytoplankton classes); or common trends driven by both geography and functional group. Our results indicated little support for a common trend in total summer phytoplankton biomass. At a finer resolution, classes had common trends that were most closely associated with the cryptophyte and cyanobacteria time series with patterns that differed between northern and southern sampling stations. These common trends were also very sensitive to two anomalous years (1990, 2008) of cryptophyte biomass. The Baltic Sea Index, a regional climate index, was correlated with two common class trends that shifted in mean state around the mid-1990s. The limited coherence in phytoplankton biomass variation over time despite known, large-scale, ecosystem shifts suggests that stochastic dynamics at local scales limits the ability to observe common trends at the scale of monitoring data collection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32353002
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231690
pii: PONE-D-19-14396
pmc: PMC7192432
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0231690Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 12;8(6):e66475
pubmed: 23776676
ISME J. 2016 Feb;10(2):450-9
pubmed: 26262817
Sci Adv. 2018 May 09;4(5):eaar8195
pubmed: 29750199
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Jun;23(6):2179-2196
pubmed: 28132408
Ambio. 2015 Jun;44 Suppl 3:413-26
pubmed: 26022324
Science. 1998 Jul 10;281(5374):237-40
pubmed: 9657713
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0146053
pubmed: 26716453
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Aug 7;275(1644):1793-801
pubmed: 18460432
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 15;10(6):e0130053
pubmed: 26076015
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Mar;68(3):1015-24
pubmed: 11872445
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 23;8(1):6365
pubmed: 29686314
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 13;11(7):e0158326
pubmed: 27410261
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Oct 12;365(1555):3215-26
pubmed: 20819814
Ecology. 2013 Jul;94(7):1626-35
pubmed: 23951722
Photosynth Res. 1994 Mar;39(3):235-58
pubmed: 24311124
Ambio. 2001 Aug;30(4-5):222-31
pubmed: 11697254
Science. 1995 Apr 21;268(5209):375-9
pubmed: 17746543