Patients' perspectives on how to improve diabetes care and self-management: qualitative study.
Adult
Aged
Canada
Decision Making, Shared
Diabetes Mellitus
/ psychology
Family
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Personnel
/ education
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Education as Topic
/ methods
Patient Participation
/ methods
Patient-Centered Care
/ methods
Qualitative Research
Quality Improvement
Self-Management
/ methods
Video Recording
Young Adult
expert patients
general diabetes
health communication
medical education & training
personal narratives
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 04 2020
29 04 2020
Historique:
entrez:
2
5
2020
pubmed:
2
5
2020
medline:
16
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
People living with diabetes need and deserve high-quality, individualised care. However, providing such care remains a challenge in many countries, including Canada. Patients' expertise, if acknowledged and adequately translated, could help foster patient-centred care. This study aimed to describe Expert Patients' knowledge, wisdom and advice to others with diabetes and to health professionals to improve diabetes self-management and care. We recruited a convenience sample of 21 men and women. Participants were people of diverse backgrounds who are Patient Partners in a national research network (hereafter Expert Patients). We interviewed and video-recorded their knowledge, wisdom and advice for health professionals and for others with diabetes. Three researchers independently analysed videos using inductive framework analysis, identifying themes through discussion and consensus. Expert Patients were involved in all aspects of study design, conduct, analysis and knowledge translation. Acknowledging and accepting the reality of diabetes, receiving support from family and care teams and not letting diabetes control one's life are essential to live well with diabetes. To improve diabetes care, health professionals should understand and acknowledge the impact of diabetes on patients and their families, and communicate with patients openly, respectfully, with empathy and cultural competency. Expert Patients pointed to a number of areas of improvement in diabetes care that may be actionable individually by patients or health professionals, and also collectively through intergroup collaboration. Improving the quality of care in diabetes is crucial for improving health outcomes for people with diabetes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32354775
pii: bmjopen-2019-032762
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032762
pmc: PMC7213839
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e032762Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : SCA-145101
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : FDN-148426
Pays : Canada
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: RN holds a fellowship grant from Diabetes Action Canada. Most authors are also members of Diabetes Action Canada, either as staff (OD), researchers (MJD, M-CT, JMcG and HW) or Patient Partners (RP, AMMcC and PD). We also obtained feedback on our results from Diabetes Action Canada’s Patient Partner Collective Circle. All participants (Diabetes Action Canada Patient Partners) were informed that participation in this study was independent of their other participation in Diabetes Action Canada and that, if they preferred not to participate, the decision would have no impact on their participation in Diabetes Action Canada. Patient Partners were not compensated for their participation in the video recording. However, all Patient Partners were offered compensation for their time attending the meeting and reimbursement of travel costs. Such compensation and reimbursement were in accordance with the network’s compensation and reimbursement policy. This policy aims to appropriately recognise and value the expertise that Patient Partners bring to research within the network. Patient Partners were also offered compensation for time spent reviewing and commenting on the findings of this study
Références
CMAJ. 2017 Jan 23;189(3):E106-E112
pubmed: 28246155
Med Decis Making. 2013 Jan;33(1):4-13
pubmed: 23065418
Can J Diabetes. 2016 Apr;40(2):164-9
pubmed: 26923335
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016 Nov 19;30:442
pubmed: 28210607
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Feb;22(2):275-9
pubmed: 17357000
Can J Nurs Res. 2006 Sep;38(3):124-45
pubmed: 17037117
Fam Pract. 2017 Jun 1;34(3):358-363
pubmed: 28043961
Acad Med. 2015 Apr;90(4):437-41
pubmed: 25607943
BMJ Open. 2013 Nov 14;3(11):e003583
pubmed: 24231459
JAMA. 2014 Oct 15;312(15):1513-4
pubmed: 25167382
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Mar;50:1-7
pubmed: 27998806
Can J Nurs Res. 2008 Sep;40(3):16-36
pubmed: 18947090
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Oct;27(19-20):3666-3678
pubmed: 29495094
Diabetologia. 2019 Jul;62(7):1167-1172
pubmed: 30969375
CMAJ. 2017 Aug 14;189(32):E1043-E1045
pubmed: 30967370
Health Expect. 2018 Apr;21(2):549-559
pubmed: 29165920
Can Fam Physician. 2019 Jan;65(1):14-24
pubmed: 30674509
Med Anthropol. 2014;33(6):529-45
pubmed: 24964719
Evid Based Nurs. 2016 Apr;19(2):41-2
pubmed: 26884510
Can J Diabetes. 2016 Jun;40(3):234-41
pubmed: 26948024
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 09;9(4):e94207
pubmed: 24718585
Can J Diabetes. 2018 Feb;42(1):36-43
pubmed: 28549668
J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Mar;5(1):13-8
pubmed: 24404220
Intern Med J. 2013 Jul;43(7):747-50
pubmed: 23841759
J Pediatr Psychol. 2017 Sep 1;42(8):846-860
pubmed: 28369409
Endocrine. 2016 Jul;53(1):18-27
pubmed: 26494579