Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial evaluating personalised care planning for older people with frailty: PROSPER V2 27/11/18.
Cluster
Frailty
Older people
Personalised care planning
Quality of life
RCT
eFI
Journal
Pilot and feasibility studies
ISSN: 2055-5784
Titre abrégé: Pilot Feasibility Stud
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101676536
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
18
12
2019
accepted:
07
04
2020
entrez:
2
5
2020
pubmed:
2
5
2020
medline:
2
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Frailty is characterised by increased vulnerability to falls, disability, hospitalisation and care home admission. However, it is relatively reversible in the early stages. Older people living with frailty often have multiple health and social issues which are difficult to address but could benefit from proactive, person-centred care. Personalised care planning aims to improve outcomes through better self-management, care coordination and access to community resources. This feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial aims to recruit 400 participants from 11 general practice clusters across Bradford and Leeds in the north of England. Eligible patients will be aged over 65 with an electronic frailty index score of 0.21 (identified via their electronic health record), living in their own homes, without severe cognitive impairment and not in receipt of end of life care. After screening for eligible patients, a restricted 1:1 cluster-level randomisation will be used to allocate practices to the PROSPER intervention, which will be delivered over 12 weeks by a personal independence co-ordinator worker, or usual care. Following initial consent, participants will complete a baseline questionnaire in their own home including measures of health-related quality of life, activities of daily living, depression and health and social care resource use. Follow-up will be at six and 12 months. Feasibility outcomes relate to progression criteria based around recruitment, intervention delivery, retention and follow-up. An embedded process evaluation will contribute to iterative intervention optimisation and logic model development by examining staff training, intervention implementation and contextual factors influencing delivery and uptake of the intervention. Whilst personalised care planning can improve outcomes in long-term conditions, implementation in routine settings is poor. We will evaluate the feasibility of conducting a cluster randomised controlled trial of personalised care planning in a community population based on frailty status. Key objectives will be to test fidelity of trial design, gather data to refine sample size calculation for the planned definitive trial, optimise data collection processes and optimise the intervention including training and delivery. ISRCTN12363970 - 08/11/18.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Frailty is characterised by increased vulnerability to falls, disability, hospitalisation and care home admission. However, it is relatively reversible in the early stages. Older people living with frailty often have multiple health and social issues which are difficult to address but could benefit from proactive, person-centred care. Personalised care planning aims to improve outcomes through better self-management, care coordination and access to community resources.
METHODS
METHODS
This feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial aims to recruit 400 participants from 11 general practice clusters across Bradford and Leeds in the north of England. Eligible patients will be aged over 65 with an electronic frailty index score of 0.21 (identified via their electronic health record), living in their own homes, without severe cognitive impairment and not in receipt of end of life care. After screening for eligible patients, a restricted 1:1 cluster-level randomisation will be used to allocate practices to the PROSPER intervention, which will be delivered over 12 weeks by a personal independence co-ordinator worker, or usual care. Following initial consent, participants will complete a baseline questionnaire in their own home including measures of health-related quality of life, activities of daily living, depression and health and social care resource use. Follow-up will be at six and 12 months. Feasibility outcomes relate to progression criteria based around recruitment, intervention delivery, retention and follow-up. An embedded process evaluation will contribute to iterative intervention optimisation and logic model development by examining staff training, intervention implementation and contextual factors influencing delivery and uptake of the intervention.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Whilst personalised care planning can improve outcomes in long-term conditions, implementation in routine settings is poor. We will evaluate the feasibility of conducting a cluster randomised controlled trial of personalised care planning in a community population based on frailty status. Key objectives will be to test fidelity of trial design, gather data to refine sample size calculation for the planned definitive trial, optimise data collection processes and optimise the intervention including training and delivery.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ISRCTN12363970 - 08/11/18.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32355566
doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00598-x
pii: 598
pmc: PMC7187486
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
56Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : RP-PG-0216-20003
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsThere are no financial or other competing interests for principal investigators for the overall trial and each study site.
Références
Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):752-62
pubmed: 23395245
Lancet. 2012 Jul 7;380(9836):37-43
pubmed: 22579043
Implement Sci. 2009 May 21;4:29
pubmed: 19460163
Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215
pubmed: 847061
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258
pubmed: 25791983
BMJ. 2012 Jun 13;344:e3526
pubmed: 22695898
Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Jul;60(576):e305-18
pubmed: 20594432
Implement Sci. 2013 Apr 11;8:43
pubmed: 23578304
PLoS Med. 2009 Sep;6(9):e1000111
pubmed: 19787044
Health Psychol. 2004 Sep;23(5):443-51
pubmed: 15367063
Age Ageing. 2015 Sep;44(5):732-5
pubmed: 26175349
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Jun;54(6):975-9
pubmed: 16776795
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332
pubmed: 20332509
BMJ. 2014 Mar 07;348:g1687
pubmed: 24609605
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;18(6):1075-1078
pubmed: 29085540
Age Ageing. 2016 May;45(3):353-60
pubmed: 26944937
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 03;(3):CD010523
pubmed: 25733495
BMC Geriatr. 2007 Jun 26;7:14
pubmed: 17594470
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 7;9(3):e026744
pubmed: 30850418
Lancet. 2015 Feb 14;385(9968):e7-e9
pubmed: 25468154