Performance of LI-RADS version 2018 CT treatment response algorithm in tumor response evaluation and survival prediction of patients with single hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS)
computed tomography (CT)
radiofrequency ablation (RFA)
treatment response algorithm (TRA)
Journal
Annals of translational medicine
ISSN: 2305-5839
Titre abrégé: Ann Transl Med
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101617978
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2020
Mar 2020
Historique:
entrez:
2
5
2020
pubmed:
2
5
2020
medline:
2
5
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System treatment response algorithm (LI-RADS TRA) was developed to evaluate the tumor response of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after locoregional treatments. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of LI-RADS computed tomography (CT) TRA version 2018 in tumor response assessment and survival prediction of patients with single HCC after radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Forty patients who underwent RFA for single HCC between 2010 and 2016 were included in this retrospective study. The overall survival (OS) data from all the patients after the first therapy was collected. Two readers independently assessed the pretreatment (within 7 d) and posttreatment (within 90 d after RFA) CT manifestations using the LI-RADS version 2018 CT TRA. Inter-reader agreement was assessed. Another radiologist re-evaluated any divergent results and came to the final conclusion. The performance of LI-RADS version 2018 CT TRA for tumor response assessment and predicting survival of patients with single HCC after RFA was evaluated. Interobserver agreement was moderate between the 2 readers [κ=0.602, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.390-0.814] when using LI-RADS version 2018 TRA to evaluate tumor response for patients with single HCC after RFA. Patients classified as LR-TR viable had significantly lower OS than those classified as LR-TR nonviable (P=0.005) and LR-TR equivocal (P=0.036). However, the OS between LR-TR nonviable and LR-TR equivocal did not differ significantly (P=0.901). LI-RADS version 2018 CT TRA can be applied to predict viable or nonviable HCC after RFA. Patients with LR-TR viable had significantly lower OS than those with LR-TR nonviable and LR-TR equivocal. More research is needed to validate the performance of LI-RADS version 2018 TRA in HCC tumor response evaluation, to better grasp the use of the tie-breaking rule, and to improve the accuracy of prediction for tumor viability.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System treatment response algorithm (LI-RADS TRA) was developed to evaluate the tumor response of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after locoregional treatments. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of LI-RADS computed tomography (CT) TRA version 2018 in tumor response assessment and survival prediction of patients with single HCC after radiofrequency ablation (RFA).
METHODS
METHODS
Forty patients who underwent RFA for single HCC between 2010 and 2016 were included in this retrospective study. The overall survival (OS) data from all the patients after the first therapy was collected. Two readers independently assessed the pretreatment (within 7 d) and posttreatment (within 90 d after RFA) CT manifestations using the LI-RADS version 2018 CT TRA. Inter-reader agreement was assessed. Another radiologist re-evaluated any divergent results and came to the final conclusion. The performance of LI-RADS version 2018 CT TRA for tumor response assessment and predicting survival of patients with single HCC after RFA was evaluated.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Interobserver agreement was moderate between the 2 readers [κ=0.602, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.390-0.814] when using LI-RADS version 2018 TRA to evaluate tumor response for patients with single HCC after RFA. Patients classified as LR-TR viable had significantly lower OS than those classified as LR-TR nonviable (P=0.005) and LR-TR equivocal (P=0.036). However, the OS between LR-TR nonviable and LR-TR equivocal did not differ significantly (P=0.901).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
LI-RADS version 2018 CT TRA can be applied to predict viable or nonviable HCC after RFA. Patients with LR-TR viable had significantly lower OS than those with LR-TR nonviable and LR-TR equivocal. More research is needed to validate the performance of LI-RADS version 2018 TRA in HCC tumor response evaluation, to better grasp the use of the tie-breaking rule, and to improve the accuracy of prediction for tumor viability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 32355832
doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.120
pii: atm-08-06-388
pmc: PMC7186681
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
388Informations de copyright
2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form and declare: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
Radiology. 2020 Feb;294(2):320-326
pubmed: 31845843
Hepatology. 2018 Aug;68(2):723-750
pubmed: 29624699
Eur J Ultrasound. 2001 Jun;13(2):159-66
pubmed: 11369527
Korean J Radiol. 2019 Dec;20(12):1616-1626
pubmed: 31854149
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Sep;7(18):428
pubmed: 31700864
Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Oct;62:78-86
pubmed: 31247250
Radiology. 2019 Jul;292(1):226-234
pubmed: 31038409
Transl Cancer Res. 2019 Apr;8(Suppl 3):S261-S274
pubmed: 35117106
Semin Liver Dis. 2010 Feb;30(1):52-60
pubmed: 20175033
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Aug;19(8):1466-75
pubmed: 26014717
J Hepatol. 2013 Jun;58(6):1181-7
pubmed: 23395691
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Feb 2;92(3):205-16
pubmed: 10655437
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 Jan;43(1):203-217
pubmed: 29230556
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 May;44(5):1773-1784
pubmed: 30603882
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
Liver Transpl. 2020 Feb;26(2):203-214
pubmed: 31677319
J Hepatol. 2001 Sep;35(3):421-30
pubmed: 11592607
Hepatol Int. 2020 Jan;14(1):70-79
pubmed: 31802388
Pediatr Radiol. 2015 Mar;45(3):317-28
pubmed: 25726014
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Dec;183(6):1619-28
pubmed: 15547201
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 10;14(12):e0226291
pubmed: 31821360
Cancer. 1981 Jan 1;47(1):207-14
pubmed: 7459811
Eur J Radiol. 2008 Aug;67(2):336-347
pubmed: 17765421
Eur Radiol. 2020 Jan;30(1):261-271
pubmed: 31418085
Clin Radiol. 2020 Apr;75(4):319.e1-319.e9
pubmed: 31858990
Radiographics. 2017 Nov-Dec;37(7):1994-2017
pubmed: 29131761
Hepatology. 2015 Mar;61(3):1056-65
pubmed: 25041904
Digestion. 2017;96(1):1-4
pubmed: 28605745