A Facilitated Web-Based Self-Management Tool for People With Type 1 Diabetes Using an Insulin Pump: Intervention Development Using the Behavior Change Wheel and Theoretical Domains Framework.

behavior change wheel continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion self-management social support type 1 diabetes web-based intervention

Journal

Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 05 2020
Historique:
received: 11 03 2019
accepted: 16 12 2019
revised: 08 11 2019
entrez: 2 5 2020
pubmed: 2 5 2020
medline: 2 5 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) requires intensive self-management (SM). An insulin pump is designed to better support personal T1D management, but at the same time, it exacerbates the complexity and requirements of SM. Research shows that people with diabetes are likely to benefit from navigating and connecting to local means of social support and resources through web-based interventions that offer flexible, innovative, and accessible SM. However, questions remain as to which behavior change mechanisms within such resources benefit patients most and how to foster engagement with and endorsement of SM interventions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the perspectives and experiences of people with T1D using an insulin pump and specialist health care professionals (HCPs) and determine what behavior change characteristics and strategies are required to inform the optimization of an existing web-based social network (SN) intervention to support SM. Focus groups with insulin pump users (n=19) and specialist HCPs (n=20) in 6 National Health Service (NHS) trusts across the south of England examined the barriers and enablers to incorporating and self-managing an insulin pump. An analysis was undertaken using the Behavior Change Wheel and Theoretical Domains Framework, followed by a taxonomy of behavior change techniques (BCTs) to identify the contents of and strategies for the implementation of a complex health intervention. A total of 4 themes represent the SM perspectives and experiences of stakeholders: (1) a desire for access to tailored and appropriate resources and information-the support and information required for successful SM are situational and contextual, and these vary according to time and life circumstances, and therefore, these need to be tailored and appropriate; (2) specific social support preferences-taking away isolation as well as providing shared learnings and practical tips, but limitations included the fear of judgment from others and self-pity from peers; (3) the environmental context, that is, capacity and knowledge of pump clinic HCPs-HCPs acknowledge the patient's need for holistic support but lack confidence in providing it; and (4) professional responsibility and associated risks and dangers, whereas HCPs are fearful of the consequences of promoting non-NHSSM support, and they question whether SM support fits into their role. BCTs were identified to address these issues. The use of behavioral theory and a validated implementation framework provided a comprehensive approach for systematically identifying barriers and enablers of self-managing T1D with an insulin pump. A web-based SN intervention appears to offer additional forms of SM support while complementing NHS services. However, for intervention implementation, HCPs' apprehensions about responsibility when signposting to non-NHS SM support would need to be addressed, and opportunistic features would need to be added, through which pump users could actively engage with other people living with T1D.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) requires intensive self-management (SM). An insulin pump is designed to better support personal T1D management, but at the same time, it exacerbates the complexity and requirements of SM. Research shows that people with diabetes are likely to benefit from navigating and connecting to local means of social support and resources through web-based interventions that offer flexible, innovative, and accessible SM. However, questions remain as to which behavior change mechanisms within such resources benefit patients most and how to foster engagement with and endorsement of SM interventions.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to evaluate the perspectives and experiences of people with T1D using an insulin pump and specialist health care professionals (HCPs) and determine what behavior change characteristics and strategies are required to inform the optimization of an existing web-based social network (SN) intervention to support SM.
METHODS
Focus groups with insulin pump users (n=19) and specialist HCPs (n=20) in 6 National Health Service (NHS) trusts across the south of England examined the barriers and enablers to incorporating and self-managing an insulin pump. An analysis was undertaken using the Behavior Change Wheel and Theoretical Domains Framework, followed by a taxonomy of behavior change techniques (BCTs) to identify the contents of and strategies for the implementation of a complex health intervention.
RESULTS
A total of 4 themes represent the SM perspectives and experiences of stakeholders: (1) a desire for access to tailored and appropriate resources and information-the support and information required for successful SM are situational and contextual, and these vary according to time and life circumstances, and therefore, these need to be tailored and appropriate; (2) specific social support preferences-taking away isolation as well as providing shared learnings and practical tips, but limitations included the fear of judgment from others and self-pity from peers; (3) the environmental context, that is, capacity and knowledge of pump clinic HCPs-HCPs acknowledge the patient's need for holistic support but lack confidence in providing it; and (4) professional responsibility and associated risks and dangers, whereas HCPs are fearful of the consequences of promoting non-NHSSM support, and they question whether SM support fits into their role. BCTs were identified to address these issues.
CONCLUSIONS
The use of behavioral theory and a validated implementation framework provided a comprehensive approach for systematically identifying barriers and enablers of self-managing T1D with an insulin pump. A web-based SN intervention appears to offer additional forms of SM support while complementing NHS services. However, for intervention implementation, HCPs' apprehensions about responsibility when signposting to non-NHS SM support would need to be addressed, and opportunistic features would need to be added, through which pump users could actively engage with other people living with T1D.

Identifiants

pubmed: 32356776
pii: v22i5e13980
doi: 10.2196/13980
pmc: PMC7229530
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e13980

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

©Claire Reidy, Claire Foster, Anne Rogers. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 01.05.2020.

Références

BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 27;18(1):898
pubmed: 30482202
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Aug;82(8):637-52
pubmed: 23792137
Diabet Med. 2017 Aug;34(8):1074-1083
pubmed: 28195662
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 02;19(2):e20
pubmed: 28153817
JMIR Diabetes. 2019 Apr 02;4(2):e13634
pubmed: 30938693
Diabet Med. 2015 Feb;32(2):155-63
pubmed: 25354315
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 16;9(10):e109135
pubmed: 25330169
JMIR Diabetes. 2017 Feb 15;2(1):e4
pubmed: 30291057
Diabet Med. 2018 Apr;35(4):419-429
pubmed: 29356074
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 02;9(6):e98340
pubmed: 24887107
Diabet Med. 2017 Dec;34(12):1658-1666
pubmed: 28636745
BMJ. 2016 Mar 10;352:i998
pubmed: 26965473
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
JMIR Diabetes. 2017 Oct 26;2(2):e27
pubmed: 30291073
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
pubmed: 18824488
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 Sep;13(5):974-978
pubmed: 31096768
Health Educ Behav. 2003 Apr;30(2):170-95
pubmed: 12693522
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 10;18(3):e61
pubmed: 26965990
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2019 May;13(3):457-465
pubmed: 30862185
Diabet Med. 2016 Sep;33(9):1174-83
pubmed: 26939906
Curr Diab Rep. 2011 Dec;11(6):486-93
pubmed: 21960031
J Med Internet Res. 2004 Nov 10;6(4):e40
pubmed: 15631964
JMIR Diabetes. 2018 Apr 24;3(2):e8
pubmed: 30291079
Implement Sci. 2014 Feb 13;9:19
pubmed: 24524253
Am Psychol. 2016 Oct;71(7):539-551
pubmed: 27690483
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95
pubmed: 23512568
BMJ. 2007 Mar 3;334(7591):455-9
pubmed: 17332585
Implement Sci. 2017 Sep 16;12(1):115
pubmed: 28915897
P T. 2014 Jul;39(7):491-520
pubmed: 25083128
Health Expect. 2018 Aug;21(4):714-729
pubmed: 29418050
Curr Diab Rep. 2006 Apr;6(2):117-22
pubmed: 16542622
Diabet Med. 2019 Jul;36(7):847-853
pubmed: 30315608
Diabet Med. 2012 Nov;29(11):1358-60
pubmed: 22681530
Diabetes Manag (Lond). 2015;5(6):499-510
pubmed: 30100925
Diabetes Care. 2018 Aug;41(8):1579-1589
pubmed: 29936424
Implement Sci. 2017 Jun 21;12(1):77
pubmed: 28637486
Diabet Med. 2012 May;29(5):654-61
pubmed: 21992512
Diabetologia. 2019 Mar;62(3):408-417
pubmed: 30483858
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Mar 10;13(1):e30
pubmed: 21393123
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2015 Mar 18;8:139-46
pubmed: 25834455
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Feb;14(1):26-33
pubmed: 15692000
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jan 24;19(1):23
pubmed: 30678684
Implement Sci. 2011 May 29;6:56
pubmed: 21619695
Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Dec;93(3):420-5
pubmed: 23830239
Implement Sci. 2016 Feb 29;11:27
pubmed: 26926837
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Dec;23(12):1992-9
pubmed: 18855075
Diabet Med. 2016 Nov;33(11):1499-1507
pubmed: 26526088
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Feb;21(2):66-72
pubmed: 30657336
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42
pubmed: 21513547
Diabetes Care. 2017 Oct;40(10):1409-1419
pubmed: 28754780
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Jun 18;3(2):e69
pubmed: 26088692
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Feb;6(2):130-142
pubmed: 28970034
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907
pubmed: 29937585
Diabet Med. 2016 Sep;33(9):1194-203
pubmed: 27353119
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:37
pubmed: 22530986
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Jan;11(1):182-183
pubmed: 27207891
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013 Sep;101(3):278-85
pubmed: 23891305
J Health Psychol. 1998 Jul;3(3):329-48
pubmed: 22021395

Auteurs

Claire Reidy (C)

National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental & Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
School of Primary Care, Population Health & Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.

Claire Foster (C)

Macmillan Survivorship Research Group, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental & Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.

Anne Rogers (A)

National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental & Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.

Classifications MeSH